I wonder if little shenanigans like this happen with every election, but for this one the media are reporting them instead of ignoring them?
Possible, in the sense of being effectively impossible to prove something either way with a supposition that there wouldn't be evidence even if the case. I'd say that it's very unlikely that something meaningfully equivalent has been happening. For reference, usually, the candidate who has fairly certainly lost will concede, though, and thus the matter will be effectively settled in the mind of the public long, long before. Trump gets a little bit of a grace period because of COVID causing mail-in ballots to surge in swing states that were not well prepared for such and the closeness of the election, but it's long past that grace period, by this point.
Separately, to poke at what RolandRat quoted a bit...
"Since his defeat, Trump’s supporters have retreated into a world of denial and conspiracy theories. But if we on the left are going to mock them for their delusions, we should take a look at how we think — and obsess — about the president ourselves.
Trump is exactly as weak as he appears. He has no surprise tactics up his sleeve. He does all his scheming in public. During the Russia investigation, many of us assumed there must be some secret dealings beneath the surface of what he clumsily said and did on television. There were none.
A bit of a mischaracterization, I'd say. Trump and co certainly tried and actively worked to cover up - and Trump Tower Moscow certainly counts as an example of a secret dealing. Add to that that more direct investigation of Trump-Russia was apparently killed by Rosenstein all along, both for Mueller and the FBI, and the ground that that rests on gets even less steady. Trump is weak and not very intelligent, to be kind - but, to Godwin things a bit... Hitler was very similar to Trump, personality-wise. Many of the dangers that Trump has posed all along have little to do with his personal capabilities - or are made more dangerous by his weaknesses.
The same goes for his incoherent, hapless court cases. This really is all he’s got.
Until the transition began, I myself worried that Trump would somehow get the Supreme Court to reverse the election for him. I never dreamed he’d bring a case so half-baked, and bungle it so badly, that the Supreme Court wouldn’t even hear it. He’d been bluffing all along — he was never a powerful fascist who had bent the judiciary to his will. Even on the left, he had us all conned.
Us all? Hmm? This is off by more than a little. Much of the point of getting Trump out NOW was to PREVENT Trump from becoming such a figure, because it sure looks like our country is in a far, far more dangerous situation than we like. There were fears that it might already be too late, of course, but "conned?" No. Had we been conned, voter turnout would fairly certainly have been significantly depressed, rather than dramatically higher than usual.
As we try to make sense of what happened these past four years, maybe it’s more comforting to think of Trump as an evil wizard than as a pathetic faker with debatable mental health problems.
Again, calling Hitler a pathetic faker with mental health problems would probably not be off the mark. The atrocities that he caused are no less horrible for that. No need to think of Trump as a wizard at all.
Sums Trump up nicely I think.
In some ways, perhaps, but it rather feels like it's throwing misdirection, disinformation (albeit potentially unintentionally), and problematic assumptions in quite a lot. More than enough to make me suspicious about the actual intentions of the writer.