Cont: Trump et al continued “2020 election” conspiracy theories

Status
Not open for further replies.
Speaking of "Time" -- Person of the Year: Not Trump. Waiting on the tweet storm.
 
As just one example of information citizens need to be “protected from” in case they draw the wrong conclusions: There has been truly astonishing suppression of all discussion surrounding the allegations of voter fraud in the recent election. On my own Facebook and Instagram accounts, any mention of the election (even on posts that favor Biden) gets flagged with a notice directing the viewer to a page with the official results.

Because they are tired of stuff that makes the guy hiding in his basement wearing his little tinfoil hat in fear of the mind control ray guns held by the gray aliens who ride around in black helicopters from Area 51 and answer to Elvis look rational :D

Heck, this paranoid insanity reads like the near end results of the card game Illuminati. :D
 
Speaking of "Time" -- Person of the Year: Not Trump. Waiting on the tweet storm.

Actually, I think it should have been exactly who you stated. It should have gone to Not Trump.



(My actual guess was Dr. Fauci, but that didn't happen.)
 
Because they are tired of stuff that makes the guy hiding in his basement wearing his little tinfoil hat in fear of the mind control ray guns held by the gray aliens who ride around in black helicopters from Area 51 and answer to Elvis look rational :D

Heck, this paranoid insanity reads like the near end results of the card game Illuminati. :D

I LOVE that game! Even bought the strategy guide :)
 
I read most of the Exhibit that does a statistical analysis of the election and concludes that what happened was so statistically unlikely that it had to be rigged. Unfortunately, the author (I forget his name) has impressive credentials and a history of being an expert witness.

He makes some assumptions that are so obviously wrong that even I, a statistical flunkie, could find them. For example, he claims there are no differences between the 2016 and 2020 elections so that he can compare the two as if the sampling populations are identical. Which is BS.

Another glaring, bad assumption he makes is that the in-person voting cohort and the mail-in voting cohort are the same; we know they are substantially different.

Etc., etc. This allows him to conclude, for example, that the Pennsylvania outcome would only happen in 1 out of (1 followed by 1700 zeros) elections. [Not exact numbers - I'm working from memory - but this is an approximation but *not* an exaggeration.] The whole thing is an embarrassment of Trumpian proportions.

ETA: My opening sentence is not clear. This is an exhibit attached to the petition that Texas submitted to the Supremes to overturn the election results..
The man doesn't know how mail-in voting works in Pennsylvania, a prerequisite to building any theory on voting patterns and probabilities. And from that he builds a pile of Z-scores from Excel to prove his extreme ignorance.
 
From Epoch Times.

MSM will probably report it later.


A brief filed by Pennsylvania House Speaker Bryan Cutler and Majority Leader Kerry Benninghoff, both Republicans, requests that the Supreme Court “carefully consider the procedural issues and questions raised by the Plaintiff concerning the administration of the 2020 General Election in Pennsylvania.”


Pennsylvania House Leaders File Brief to Support Texas in Supreme Court Lawsuit Against Pennsylvania


https://www.theepochtimes.com/penns...urt-lawsuit-against-pennsylvania_3613557.html
 
“Two years before she'd become the breakout star of the clown show Rudy Giuliani brought to Lansing this week, Mellissa Carone was sending her then-boyfriend's ex-wife graphic videos of the two of them having sex.

Police reports obtained by Deadline Detroit reveal obscenity and computer crime charges filed against the 33-year-old Grosse Pointe Woods mother stem from a harassment campaign she waged against a 42-year-old woman in 2018 and 2019...”

The degeneracy and depravity of the Trump mob never fails to impress.

Rudy really knows how to pick 'em, doesn't he? First the guy at the "Four Seasons" press conference who turned out to be a convicted child sex offender and now this ding-a-ling. What next? A serial sexual assaulter? Oh, wait....that would be Donald.
 
After only hearing her referred to as "Drunk Lady" or "Crazy Lady" and of course "Karen" in various places, I only just found out that her last name is "Carone" and there's a part of her testimony where she talks about "calling her manager over".

(time skipped to the appropriate moment)
https://youtu.be/G2f3aw9rk30?t=88

Edited to add: There's a tiny voice at the back of my mind that wonders if she was pulling off an elaborate prank. Apparently, she wasn't under oath, so I don't think there would be any consequences.


Star witness in Trump's 'voter fraud' case in Michigan used to strip at Sopranos-inspired club named the Bada Bing (DailyMail, Dec. 8, 2020)
 
Trump Tweets

Now that the Biden Administration will be a scandal plagued mess for years to come, it is much easier for the Supreme Court of the United States to follow the Constitution and do what everybody knows has to be done. They must show great Courage & Wisdom. Save the USA!!!
 
Trump Tweets

Now that the Biden Administration will be a scandal plagued mess for years to come, it is much easier for the Supreme Court of the United States to follow the Constitution and do what everybody knows has to be done. They must show great Courage & Wisdom. Save the USA!!!

If it were constitutional to overturn an election on those grounds, he wouldn't be President.

Dave
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom