2020 United States presidential election - Conspiracy theories, alleged fraud, etc

[jsfisher]

"Mathematically (logically) impossible" say MIT statisticians, regarding certain key tabulations.

Which MIT statisticians would they be, and where and when did they make such claim?

 

[Resume]

I hope he gave it to those other two morons. This is a rather elegant solution to the distraction he is causing the nation. One hopes he will remain in the hospital until the 14th when the Electoral College votes.

Objective reality bites him in the ass.

 

[Resume]

1) Avoid seeing it.

2) Pretend its not true.

Yes, how long are you going to deny reality and accept the election result?

Never mind, we know how long.

 

[Craig4]

Objective reality bites him in the ass.

If you want to get technical, it bit him in the chest. I do hope he didn't give it to any Americans. I don't care about the Trump supporters but he was also around real Americans.

 

[jsfisher]

Which of the two major parties is the one so far resisting most efforts to verify??

I do not think it fair to pose this as a strictly party phenomenon. People from both the Democratic and Republican persuasions have been looking to verify Trump's, et al., claims. Trump, et al., of course, have not cooperated by providing any sort of substantive evidence to assist in any verification.

Trump, et al., are resisting most efforts to verify. Does that answer your question?

ETA: And based on your dismissal of requests for a link to the MIT statisticians' statement, include yourself among those resisting efforts to verify.

 

[Craig4]

There are pictures of Giuliani at an event for supporters without a mask last night. It's clear, he caught the virus at a stupid spreader event.

 

[Meadmaker]

"Mathematically (logically) impossible" say MIT statisticians, regarding certain key tabulations.

No they don't. You are making stuff up.

You won't have any links that back this up (seeing it of Facebook doesn't count), because it did not happen. There are no MIT statisticians saying this.


And the great thing about this is that if you want to refute it, all you have to do is show one of them.

 

[Meadmaker]

Which of the two major parties is the one so far resisting most efforts to verify??

Neither.

 

[Matthew Ellard]

"Mathematically (logically) impossible" say MIT statisticians, regarding certain key tabulations.

Don't worry, Bubba is lying again.

Its the same debunked crap claim, from the other thread about Benfords Law, that Bubba copied from an old right wing blog

Benford's Law does not apply to elections.

Fact check: Deviation from Benford’s Law does not prove election fraud
Social media users have been sharing posts that say a mathematical rule called Benford’s Law provides clear proof of fraud in the U.S. presidential election. However, research papers and academics......
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-benford-idUSKBN27Q3AI

 

[Matthew Ellard]

Another example of someone being tricked by the dishonest sources they trust, and parroting lies. .

Tell us how you copied a debunked claim about Benfords Law from an old right wing blog.

In your own words Bubba.....

 

[Bubba]

Which MIT statisticians would they be, and where and when did they make such claim?

Sidney Powell said it a couple days ago, and the MIT part could be me mis-remembering what she actually said, or I heard maybe somebody else say MIT.

No matter if MIT or not, if the math is good. Powell said she was bringing it to court.

Be patient then.

Time will tell.

 

[Meadmaker]

Don't worry, Bubba is lying again.

Its the same debunked crap claim, from the other thread about Benfords Law, that Bubba copied from an old right wing blog

Benford's Law does not apply to elections.

Fact check: Deviation from Benford’s Law does not prove election fraud
Social media users have been sharing posts that say a mathematical rule called Benford’s Law provides clear proof of fraud in the U.S. presidential election. However, research papers and academics......
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-benford-idUSKBN27Q3AI

I wonder if any of the statisticians who did write about Benford's Law were even from MIT. I doubt it. Those guys from MIT are pretty good. They wouldn't make such an elementary error. During the day or two that I saw articles about Benford's Law, there weren't any high powered academics putting their credentials out there with the articles. They were mostly "experts" or "consultants" who had been somewhat successful as accountants and such. There's no way a real mathematician of any renown would have put his name to those articles.

 

[trustbutverify]

Sidney Powell said it a couple days ago, and the MIT part could be me mis-remembering what she actually said, or I heard maybe somebody else say MIT.

No matter if MIT or not, if the math is good. Powell said she was bringing it to court.

Be patient then.

Time will tell.

Hilarious. And REJECTED.

Next case.

 

[Meadmaker]

No matter if MIT or not, if the math is good.

If my aunt had balls....

(I got there first this time).

 

[Matthew Ellard]

Sidney Powell said it a couple days ago,

Sidney Powell lodged a court claim and wrote votes were taken from Biden and flipped to Trump.

Did you forget again.



"Attorney Sidney Powell mistakenly claimed in a court filing that a pernicious voting algorithm took votes from Joe Biden and flipped them to President Donald Trump."
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/04/sid...said-georgia-votes-were-flipped-to-trump.html

 

[Resume]

.

Time will tell.

What will it tell Bubba? That Trump gulled his foolish supporters once again in his voter fraud grift?

 

[Matthew Ellard]

I wonder if any of the statisticians who did write about Benford's Law were even from MIT.

They weren't. Bubba made that up. He simply copied the story from a right wing blog and added "MIT".

 

[Matthew Ellard]

.... if the math is good.

What maths Bubba? You have failed to say what the statistical problem is, and then lied and added "MIT".

Did you forget again?

 

[jsfisher]

Sidney Powell said it a couple days ago, and the MIT part could be me mis-remembering what she actually said, or I heard maybe somebody else say MIT.

So, no link, then.

No matter if MIT or not, if the math is good. Powell said she was bringing it to court.

Sidney Powell has said many fabulous things recently. None of them have panned out so far. The most reasonable conclusion for any skeptic at this point based on the evidence (conditional conclusion, of course, since new evidence could require a revision) would be that Sidney Powell is lying.

But that's only what a skeptic would do. Others may leap to different conclusions.


Be all that as it may, though, Bubba, you are admitting to posting baseless information. You asserted as fact something you cannot support. There is a word for that sort of behavior.

 

[Bubba]

Its nothing, really. Just a sideshow.

On the morning of November 5, as the 2020 election hung in the balance, Arizona federal agents raided a two-story house in Fountain Hills, Maricopa County, a county that had become a key battleground in the presidential race. The agents were looking for evidence of a cyberattack on an unnamed organization and stolen voter data. They left with eight hard drives, three computers and a bag of USB sticks. The resident of the property, a 56-year-old IT expert named Elliot Kerwin, was served the warrant. He is not yet facing charges and was unreachable for comment at the time of publication. There is no indication that anything other than voters’ information, which can be acquired for a few hundred dollars in Arizona counties, was taken from the affected office.

- Forbes