turingtest
Mistral, mistral wind...
Bubba, I mean this in the kindest way possible, but...has it occurred to you that you just may not have the chops for this whole "discussion" thing?
-
Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more
2020 United States presidential election - Conspiracy theories, alleged fraud, etc
- Thread starter Venom
- Start date
- Status
smartcooky
Penultimate Amazing
jsfisher
ETcorngods survivor
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2005
- Messages
- 24,532
Assumption alert !!
Which assumption(s) (or observation) might you be entertaining ?
a) That I am interested in discussing something(s) you think I dont have chops for?
b) That I am supposed to be interested discussing something(s) you think I dont have chops for?
c) Other assumption(s)......?
Which assumption(s) (or observation) might you be entertaining ?
a) That I am interested in discussing something(s) you think I dont have chops for?
b) That I am supposed to be interested discussing something(s) you think I dont have chops for?
c) Other assumption(s)......?
Seriously
Actual skeptics do not say it is not over because well, you know.
I think y'all keep on chanting variations of 'its over' because you so want it to be over, while knowing it is not over as it still could go south on you because as you know Trump will do everything in his power to disappoint your home flock, on principle, because he is convinced it was rigged.
Actual skeptics do not say it is not over because well, you know.
I think y'all keep on chanting variations of 'its over' because you so want it to be over, while knowing it is not over as it still could go south on you because as you know Trump will do everything in his power to disappoint your home flock, on principle, because he is convinced it was rigged.
Matthew Ellard
Illuminator
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2009
- Messages
- 4,094
Bubba? You made a claim about a survey you linked and now you are unable to show how you reached that conclusion.
Are you saying all your spam posts are a complete lie, or just most of them?
The Great Zaganza
Maledictorian
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2016
- Messages
- 32,795
no I won't.
Trump is nothing without his enablers who think they can profit from his crazy without going crazy themselves.
We can clearly see that they were wrong.
Matthew Ellard
Illuminator
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2009
- Messages
- 4,094
Trump has done everything in his power and he still lost the election..
Trump never built his "Wall"....
Trump never replaced Obamacare....
Trump never reduced the deficit....
Trump is a bit of a loser isn't he!
On November 20th, Gabriel Sterling, Georgia's voting system manager suggested Trump "be the better man" and accept the certified results of the election. I thought better than whom? As far as I can tell, he's never really acted like an adult in his adult life, so why would anyone expect him to now, or even broach the idea with him? His reaction to his election loss was that of an immature adolescent, a snowflake, and of course his moronic snowflake supporters follow his lead. Trump sees this, and realizes he has another grift: a vast captive audience of credulous nincompoops willing to throw money at his "election fraud" fundraising scheme, oblivious to the fact that he's going to pocket that money while laughing at the nitwits who donated it. And the nitwits eat it up, as well as the conspiracies he uses to gull them.
Does he believe any of the fraudulent conspiracy that he tweets? Hard to guess, but there is always the possibility he's conned himself. He does see the benefit in regurgitating the abject nonsense spewed on outlets like OAN or Newsmax, knowing his simpleton supporters have consumed the same odorous excrement, and will nod their heads in agreement. Keeping the idiots he openly mocks agitated will only increase the grift and I don't think he can help himself in his greed for more, just as I do think he'll lose the money he grifted in short order, whether it be in more doomed-to-fail real estate ventures, or in legal bills that will doubtless begin very soon after his eviction Jan 20.
He's done as president of course, but not as an oily con man; if we've learned anything from the last four disastrous years it is that a fool is born every minute, and that fool is easily parted from his money. Trump may be a fake billionaire, but he will live a billionaire lifestyle, financed in part by a gaggle of gullibles who never realize, or care they've been fleeced, and have voted against their best interests.
Does he believe any of the fraudulent conspiracy that he tweets? Hard to guess, but there is always the possibility he's conned himself. He does see the benefit in regurgitating the abject nonsense spewed on outlets like OAN or Newsmax, knowing his simpleton supporters have consumed the same odorous excrement, and will nod their heads in agreement. Keeping the idiots he openly mocks agitated will only increase the grift and I don't think he can help himself in his greed for more, just as I do think he'll lose the money he grifted in short order, whether it be in more doomed-to-fail real estate ventures, or in legal bills that will doubtless begin very soon after his eviction Jan 20.
He's done as president of course, but not as an oily con man; if we've learned anything from the last four disastrous years it is that a fool is born every minute, and that fool is easily parted from his money. Trump may be a fake billionaire, but he will live a billionaire lifestyle, financed in part by a gaggle of gullibles who never realize, or care they've been fleeced, and have voted against their best interests.
Seriously, you don't know what a skeptic is. A skeptic evaluates the available evidence, and in this case, the evidence for widespread voter fraud, which in this case is none. As Toady Barr confirmed. So a provisional conclusion is made, and of course subject to revision upon further data. In this case, additional data for widespread voter fraud in unlikely considering the "best" evidence has been conspicuously poor, or absent. Normally, one begins with the very best evidence, but given the track record of Trump's legal team, both official and not, there is a possibility that they don't know this.
So unless some sort of earth-moving actual, credible evidence is demonstrated, a confident statement that Trump has lost this election is justified. It is important to note that confidence in a conclusion is not the same as absolute certainty, which is nigh impossible anyway.
Last edited:
For Bubba.Bubba? You made a claim about a survey you linked and now you are unable to show how you reached that conclusion.
Are you saying all your spam posts are a complete lie, or just most of them?
Trump has done everything in his power and he still lost the election..
Trump never built his "Wall"....
Trump never replaced Obamacare....
Trump never reduced the deficit....
Trump is a bit of a loser isn't he!
For Bubba.
Not at all; Diaper Don is a con man, and as is evident, he has certainly conned you.
jsfisher
ETcorngods survivor
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2005
- Messages
- 24,532
Why don't you tell us? What are you willing and/or able to discuss? That would provide a reasonable starting point for discussion, no?
smartcooky
Penultimate Amazing
smartcooky
Penultimate Amazing
Trump has done everything in his power and he still lost the election..
Trump never built his "Wall"....
Trump never replaced Obamacare....
Trump never reduced the deficit....
Trump is a bit of a loser isn't he!
For you Bubba, in case you missed it!
smartcooky
Penultimate Amazing
Bubba? You made a claim about a survey you linked and now you are unable to show how you reached that conclusion.
Are you saying all your spam posts are a complete lie, or just most of them?
Another one for you Bubba, you know, just in case
TellyKNeasuss
Illuminator
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2006
- Messages
- 3,808
The real issue with Judicial Watch's claim is that they purport to have detected fraud while using only data that is public and easily obtainable. This should lead to questioning why no one else would have noticed the fraud if it was occurring (it's not like no one ever pays attention to how many registered voters there are - would pollsters try to keep track of how many adults and how many registered voters there are in each state?). And why 100's of counties were committing fraud in a manner that was so vulnerable to detection.
Similarly, it's hard to imagine people creating phony ballets while working in an area where they could be observed.
- Status