Cont: The Trump Presidency: Part 26

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah. Politics are ever changing. What would stop a legislature controlled by Democrats from doing the same thing in some reversed, future scenario?
Because Democrats would never be in control. If Trump got back in you could be sure of that. We would turn into a one party state like China, a 'democracy' in name only.

Or at least, that's what they think will happen - if only they can get Trump back in.
 
This via Twitter this morning...

The White House removed nine members of the Pentagon's Defense Business Board on Friday and installed people loyal to President Donald Trump in their place, including presidential allies Corey Lewandowski and David Bossie.”

This seems ominous on the surface. What could possibly be the point of installing sycophants in Pentagon-related positions?

It’s common to refer to what a new President will do “On Day One”. Let’s hope President Biden, on Day One, will have list in hand of Executive Orders and appointments such as this to strike down.

And it's stupid;if they are in a policy making position Biden can get rid of them at day one.
 
All proper-thinking people were aghast at Reagan's presidency (how innocent we were to think that we had hit rock bottom), but I don't begrudge Reagan supporting a peaceful transfer of power.

Here's Reagan on the separation of church and state. He even mentions the freedom to *not* believe, something that wasn't on many people's radar at the time.

Proper thinking meaning "People who agree with me".
 
Well, it's taken quite some time but I finally had to unfollow a friend on Facebook. (That's an option other than "UnFriending".) After the last several months of seeing nothing but politically oriented and stupid posts and Shares, I just had to do it because it grates on me that I won't respond. For now I'll just stay in my "How can people be so ******* ignorant?" zone.
 
King Arthur looks down at a disorganised lump of cheap ground beef on the ground, "You're defeated, relent and let me pass!"
The lump of hamberder looks up and replies, "I've had worse!"

Pretty much. I think there have been more than 50 rulings go against Trump. 5 on Friday alone. Definitely turned into hamburger.
 
All proper-thinking people were aghast at Reagan's presidency (how innocent we were to think that we had hit rock bottom), but I don't begrudge Reagan supporting a peaceful transfer of power.

Here's Reagan on the separation of church and state. He even mentions the freedom to *not* believe, something that wasn't on many people's radar at the time.

It's funny, no ironic that Reagan was elected with the help of the scam-vangelists, the Moral Majority etc when personally he despised them and thought they were nuts.
 
It's funny, no ironic that Reagan was elected with the help of the scam-vangelists, the Moral Majority etc when personally he despised them and thought they were nuts.

That’s the R party in a nutshell. Things are getting away from them now
 
It's funny, no ironic that Reagan was elected with the help of the scam-vangelists, the Moral Majority etc when personally he despised them and thought they were nuts.
Jesus Christ how far we have fallen as a nation; I can't imagine any republican making this kind of statement today. Not a lot of democrats, either. I remember some media talking heads back in 2015/2016, bloviating on how the evangelicals had lost much of their political power; that was a nice little fantasy, wasn't it?
 
It's funny, no ironic that Reagan was elected with the help of the scam-vangelists, the Moral Majority etc when personally he despised them and thought they were nuts.

You ought to read what Barry Godlwater had to say about what he called "THe Preachers". He predicted that if they ever got control of the GOP, they would drive it off the cliff.
 
Because Democrats would never be in control. If Trump got back in you could be sure of that. We would turn into a one party state like China, a 'democracy' in name only.
Or at least, that's what they think will happen - if only they can get Trump back in.

PDRA - People's Democratic Republic of America
 
Because Democrats would never be in control. If Trump got back in you could be sure of that. We would turn into a one party state like China, a 'democracy' in name only.

Or at least, that's what they think will happen - if only they can get Trump back in.

My concern is that the GOP, even without Trump winning this election, will try to use his loss to make the US an effectively one-party state (Washington Post via MSN):

The 2020 election took place under an unprecedented set of circumstances, and in one sense, at least, it was an inarguable success: More than 150 million people voted in the middle of a deadly pandemic — the highest turnout in more than a century. More than 100 million people voted before Election Day; in Texas, early ballots surpassed the total number of ballots cast in 2016. In many states, largely pandemic-induced modifications to the voting process delivered a preview of what permanent changes to the status quo could look like: extended voter registration deadlines, expanded early voting periods and more access to safe and secure mail-in voting. On a nationwide scale, Americans saw firsthand, for the first time, that exercising their right to vote doesn’t have to be inconvenient.

If this level of participation becomes the norm, it could be disastrous for the Republican Party, which leans on a voter suppression regime meant to prune from the electorate voters whose exercise of the franchise tends to threaten Republican power and influence. Support for more onerous voter ID laws and voter roll purges has become a quasi-official plank of the party platform, often cast as an effort to protect American democracy from the exaggerated threat of voter fraud. (Occasionally, proponents acknowledge it as an anti-democratic political hardball tactic: Recall, in 2012, GOP leader of the Pennsylvania House Mike Turzai predicting that voter ID legislation would “allow Governor Romney to win the state” in that year’s presidential election.) In 2019, shortly before Democrats in the U.S. House passed H.R. 1, a bill that would have (among other things) streamlined voter registration and championed early voting, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) penned a Washington Post op-ed ripping the legislation by dubbing it the “Democrat Politician Protection Act.”

If lawmakers permanently implement some of the measures that made 2020 a more user-friendly election, some in the GOP will look at it as an existential crisis. As Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) put it in a November interview: “If Republicans don’t challenge and change the U.S. election system, there will never be another Republican president elected again.”

“To my Republican colleagues out there,” he added, “we have to fight back, or we will accept our fate.”

A basic, even definitional, requirement in a working democracy is that all parties vying for the votes of the people in a fair election be able to accept and acknowledge when they fairly lose one. There's never been any solid evidence for the sort of widespread voter fraud Republicans moan about to justify changing the system to make it harder for people to vote- they've always simply assumed the crime they ostensibly want to prevent as their pretense for a stringency that prevents it. The GOP has increasingly become a party that not only cannot admit a loss, but sees the very possibility of it as a policy plank. It's an ultimate act of raw partisanship when, instead of submitting their ideas for acceptance to as broad a base of voters as could be in a fair election, their idea is simply to selectively narrow the base so they can't lose, which is their only definition of a fair election.
 
My concern is that the GOP, even without Trump winning this election, will try to use his loss to make the US an effectively one-party state (Washington Post via MSN):



A basic, even definitional, requirement in a working democracy is that all parties vying for the votes of the people in a fair election be able to accept and acknowledge when they fairly lose one. There's never been any solid evidence for the sort of widespread voter fraud Republicans moan about to justify changing the system to make it harder for people to vote- they've always simply assumed the crime they ostensibly want to prevent as their pretense for a stringency that prevents it. The GOP has increasingly become a party that not only cannot admit a loss, but sees the very possibility of it as a policy plank. It's an ultimate act of raw partisanship when, instead of submitting their ideas for acceptance to as broad a base of voters as could be in a fair election, their idea is simply to selectively narrow the base so they can't lose, which is their only definition of a fair election.

Well said.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom