I will wait to see what she produces in court.
How do you know the unknowable??
Actual skeptics would like to know your secret.
I don't and can't know the unknowable. But the default position is to disbelieve until a claim is proven.
That's a fundamental tenet in skepticism. Also a skeptic must weigh the evidence available to them. When someone makes an extraordinary claim, it requires extraordinary evidence. We've only heard the promise of evidence.
But we do have evidence.
1. Sydney Powell has only made wild claims to venues where she isn't accountable.
2. Not once has she walked into a courtroom where under penalty of law required to tell the truth has she made this wild claim. Powell had an opportunity on Tuesday when she was in court and she didn't. In fact, her co-counsel during questioning from the judge said that this isn't a fraud case.
3. Saying that she will sometime in the future put it before a court of law is not the same as doing it. Time is running out.
4. Finally, there is the indisputable fact that the hand recount of more than 5 million votes in Georgia eviscerates her wild claim.
Skepticism isn't reserving judgment indefinitely. Especially when a lot of contradictory evidence is staring us in the face. I personally am inclined to think someone is conning me when they delay, delay, delay on providing supporting evidence. Tucker Carlson has even rejected this woman's bs after not providing any evidence.
What are you waiting for? The rapture?