dudalb
Penultimate Amazing
From the parallel thread on https://scrutable.science
How long until Trump tweets "WHere is Wenck? Where is Steiner?".
For those of you who have not seen "Downfall" do so. One of the best World War 2 movies every made.
From the parallel thread on https://scrutable.science
So... are the rats going to start deserting the sinking ship with a forced "Trump? Oh I never supported Trump I just got coffee, barely knew the guy..." affect or will they go down with the ship?
MJS said:"This seems deeply stupid as it seems to be a solicitation to commit voter fraud," said Richard Hasen, a noted elections law specialist at the University of California, Irvine Law School. "It's hard to believe this is real."
So... are the rats going to start deserting the sinking ship with a forced "Trump? Oh I never supported Trump I just got coffee, barely knew the guy..." affect or will they go down with the ship?
So... are the rats going to start deserting the sinking ship with a forced "Trump? Oh I never supported Trump I just got coffee, barely knew the guy..." affect or will they go down with the ship?
How long until Trump tweets "WHere is Wenck? Where is Steiner?".
For those of you who have not seen "Downfall" do so. One of the best World War 2 movies every made.
Well, we know Bannon and Alex Jones are going down with the ship....
As I said above, I suspect we are going to see more of them saying how democrats have to be nice because .... snowflake or something.
Bannon, Jones and the likes sailing on a different boat. They existed before Trump, they will probably do so after.
Depends on whether they think there is still cheese available when that ship moves on to other waters. Trump will still be Trump. I don't doubt that he will still have rallies, if he can get the rubes to pay for them. I just don't know if they will be all about his skin care cream or his fashion line or his news network, but they will still be all about him.
Disagreed. They don't care a whit about Trump, or politics. They care about a...certain agenda. Anyone could front for it.
His base should have rejected him right out of the gate. A spoiled rich boy who ducked the draft with daddy's influence, a proud deadbeat whose word means nothing, never worked a day in his life, no loyalty, basically no traits his base would respect.
But he belated that certain something that struck a chord. They just need a slicker spokesman to push the same agenda.
But he bleated that certain something that struck a chord. They just need a slicker spokesman to push the same agenda.
That's unbelievable. America is so much better off without Trump, and this is good evidence.
I think it is important to reiterate:
Trump is not the problem, he is the result of the problem.
At some point, I'd like to see the subtitles with the original translation so I can see what it's actually about.
Bush in 88, also Reagan in 84Won't happen. The GOP will never agree. Why would they? When was the last time one of their candidates won the popular vote?
I think it is important to reiterate:
Trump is not the problem, he is the result of the problem.
Fox News finds a worthwhile headline: a recount.LOL
https://mobile.twitter.com/FoxNews/status/1324741552036564993
Rep. Jim Jordan
@Jim_Jordan
·
Nov 5
Why is it always Democrat-run cities in swing states that experience voting issues?
Election integrity!
I see almost no chance that Trump will ever admit he lost this election.