Stockholm syndrome?
There are four key components that characterize Stockholm syndrome:
A hostage's development of positive feelings towards the captor
No previous relationship between hostage and captor
A refusal by hostages to cooperate with police forces and other government authorities (unless the captors themselves happen to be members of police forces or government authorities).
A hostage's belief in the humanity of the captor because they cease to perceive the captor as a threat when the victim holds the same values as the aggressor[7]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_syndrome
No, I don't think so even though it would be fun to claim that Swedes suffer from Stockholm syndrome.
I think it's mainly a question of ordinary, old-fashioned nationalism:
More think their country has handled COVID-19 well, with the exceptions of the U.S. and UK (PEW, Aug. 26, 2020)
Very early on in this thread, I had a couple of posts and links to articles about the peculiarities of Swedish nationalism. One of those peculiarities is Swedish consensus culture and the belief that Sweden is a particularly sensible nation, maybe even the only one of its kind. A new article describes it like this:
Experts put forward a host of reasons but at the core is a sense that, despite its size, Sweden is a “moral superpower” that seeks to act rationally, whereas it perceives the behaviour of other countries to be based on political calculations or emotions.
(...)
Sweden’s position was not built on a thorough plan but rather it improvised an explanation for its policy. In the case of Covid-19 it avoided formal restrictions and relied on individual responsibility to achieve behavioural changes. From a lack of formal lockdown to very limited use of face masks, the man in charge of Sweden’s coronavirus response — state epidemiologist Anders Tegnell — has insisted he is following the scientific evidence while other countries take decisions for more political reasons.
“It suits the image we have in this nation of being different and ‘superior’. We [tell ourselves that we] have better ideas than others, in Sweden. We are an extremely secular nation where rationality is perceived as a higher value. If you want to argue for something you say rationality is on our side,” says Mr Wolodarski, a sceptic of Mr Tegnell’s approach, “even though it is not true that the science is clear cut on our side.[/hilite]”
Sweden: why the ‘moral superpower’ dissented over Covid-19 (FinancialTimes, Oct. 16, 2020)
The Swedish skeptics have a forum similar to this one where they started a thread comparing the pandemic response of Sweden to the rest of the world - and to Denmark, in particular, on March 14:
Vilka nationella eller regionala åtgärder mot coronavirus är evidensbaserade?
Which national or regional measures against coronavirus are evidence-based?
Before spending any time researching this, they immediately agree that, yes, obviously, Sweden's strategy is evidence-based unlike Denmark's:
Translation:Precis! Danska sundhetsstyrelsen var väldigt tydliga med att Danmarks åtgärder var politiska, inte evidensbaserade.
"Exactly! The Danish Health Agency was very clear that Denmark's pandemic measures were political, not evidence-based."
Whereas a link to well-argued criticism (Medium, March 14, 2020) of the Flattening-the-Curve strategy, which Sweden had chosen (and stuck to until very recently - if they ever actually gave it up) is dismissed out of hand: Sweden's strategy has got to be superior because it is ... well, Swedish, obviously, so it is just as obvious that any other strategy, un-Swedish as it is, must be wrong.
Swedish consensus culture is much more effective than the Stockholm syndrome. Anders Tegnell doesn't have to take anybody hostage at gun point. All he needs to do is to claim that his strategy represents Swedish evidence-based science, and then all consensus-seeking Swedes will be convinced that any other strategy is improvised and based on nothing but emotional nonsense.
Thousands of bodies don't convince them that something may be wrong with their allegedly evidence-based strategy, and when other countries are obviously better than Sweden in all aspects of their pandemic response, their chief epidemiologist is there to tell them that it is "impossible."
The hysterical fact-resistance of Swedes in this thread is not atypical. It is the way Swedish 'skeptics' react when reality doesn't live up to the idea of Swedish superiority, which the whole world ought to know is the only proper evidence they need. If facts don't support this idea, then they'll make up 'facts' that do: Sweden 0
Then the world feels right again - for a while.
There are exceptions to this, however. Some of the Swedish skeptics are no-nonsense straight-shooters.
Last edited: