Segnosaur
Penultimate Amazing
Any constitutional change (such as eliminating the electoral college and using the popular vote) requires:Well, of course I know all that. But ... why is it STILL so?Because the Constitution was written more than 200 years ago, and it's not easy to change. It made sense at the time.
But it's true, elections are conducted entirely by states, and administered by cities/local authorities.
And as Bob noted, technically, you don't even elect a President with your vote. You elect a slate of electors, who almost always vote for the candidate they are pledged to
- 2/3rds majority in both the house and senate
- Ratification by 3/4ths of the state
Decades ago, it may have been possible to get congress on side, but with the extreme polarization that the U.S. currently has, I doubt very much whether the republicans would be in favor of adopting a popular vote system (since they sometimes win only because of the electoral college).
And it would probably be very difficult to get some of the smaller states on board, because they would lose political influence.
Now, there is an attempt to get around that via the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (Wikipedia). This would leave the college of electors in place, but direct them to vote for whomever wins the national popular vote (rather than whomever wins the state vote), assuming they can get enough states to agree to it. No constitutional change is required.