No, there are claims with no sources. I know they exist, although they contradict reality.
https://www.kyivpost.com/article/co...vsky-in-ukraine-pgo-407348.html?cn-reloaded=1
"The PGO clarifies that the court satisfied the petition on February 2, 2016."
This is just right before Biden has him fired. Also
http://www.europeanukraine.org/home/2016/02/gpo-seizes-property-of-ex-minister-zlochevsky/
"The PGO reminded that on 25 December 2015, i.e. when the court passed on the decision on removal of arrest of Zlochevsky’s property, the prosecution authorities conducted a preliminary investigation and
did not implement procedural guidance in the criminal proceedings due to the fact that the criminal proceedings were transferred to the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine.
In connection with the passing of the law of Ukraine «On amendments to the criminal procedure code of Ukraine regarding criminal proceedings which are investigated by investigators of bodies of Prosecutor’s office» 27 January 2016
the criminal proceedings were returned for further pre-trial investigation and procedural guidance to the General Prosecutor of Ukraine."
So action by Shokin stopped while it was turned over to NABU for a short period. That's about the extent of "not investigating," by all other accounts there was movement in the investigation and charges, going so far as to confiscate Zlochevsky’s property.
I know you and everyone here will say, but, but, but, people said he wasn't doing anything, yet I just showed you he was.
Then what happened, Zlochevsky returned to Ukraine in February 2018 after investigations into his Burisma Holdings had been completed in December 2017 with no charges filed against him.
So they fired the guy who confiscated his property shortly before Biden got him fired and put in a guy who closed the investigation with no charges.