Another Antifa Call for Violence

That is the Trump version of both anarchists and antifas.

Well come on. Anarchists are well known for lobbing the occasional cocktail. They have done so nationwide, nay, worldwide. But all antifa are not anarchists. It's dishonest to claim that there is no overlap. That's also why I said anarchists, and not antifa.

Plus I was kidding.
 
Last edited:
I don't take the side of any of them. And if you took a moment to look around, you would perhaps recognize that the only people on ISF who routinely advocate for violence are all people who consider themselves progressive leftists.

That right wing violence is more prevalent and more of a threat than left wing violence isn’t even debatable.

Your half-assed bothsidesism is pathetic.
 
That right wing violence is more prevalent and more of a threat than left wing violence isn’t even debatable.

Your half-assed bothsidesism is pathetic.

Also the right wing violence has a very specific goal: to overthrow the US republic and replace it with a one-party State.

Frankly I’m on the side of simple anarchy
 
And those who support the police or just violence against blacks. See all the defending of the killing of Ahmaud Arbery.

Philando Castile...John Crawford III...Trayvon Martin...Eric Garner...Jordan Davis...Freddie Grey...Breonna Taylor...black people in Ferguson MO, black high school kids in Baltimore MD...

I could go on, very easily.

As I said, I *understand* cases where people lash out at police, when the cops act like a violent goon squad, or in Ferguson's case the enforcers for an outright white supremacist local government that act to fill their coffers by robbing the black residents blind.

(and for reference, reverse the races, so a black police force is robbing local white people. **** those cops, too - we know the white supremacists, including those here, would lose their minds in that case, just as they were infuriated when the DoJ inspectors noted police routinely violated the civil rights of black and Hispanic people *while the inspectors were sitting in the car with them*)
 
Sure if you say so. Feel free to elaborate on what you're talking about.



If we go with the fashionable definition of nazi as "person with non-far left-politics", you'd be correct too.

If you mean actual nazis or white supremacists, maybe you should provide evidence.

Does this count?

Lafayette police fired a recently hired officer less than 24 hours after he was accused to having ties to racist posts made on a fascist web forum, LPD Chief Pat Flannelly confirmed Saturday afternoon.

https://www.jconline.com/story/news/2020/10/17/lafayette-police-investigating-claim-new-lpd-officer-part-neo-nazi-forum/3693646001/

Would have been undetected, but online antifascist activists had recently doxxed the entire "Iron march" nazi forums, releasing personal info on all the members of the explicitly fascist website.

That's one less explicitly fascist cop working the streets, thanks to antifa.

ETA: Portland police captain was building shrines to Nazi soldiers. Totally normal, non-fascist behavior.

For years, past police chiefs and city attorneys have vigorously fended off critics who called Portland police Capt. Mark Kruger a "Nazi sympathizer." They said he was simply a history buff who collected military memorabilia and had belonged to a World War II reenactment club.

But now, a Portland commander and a Portland Police Performance Review Board have found Kruger brought "discredit and disgrace upon the Bureau and the City," by building a public tribute to five Nazi-era German soldiers at a city park while employed by the police bureau.

https://www.oregonlive.com/portland/2010/10/portland_police_panel_finds_ca.html
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom