Cont: Qanon Conspiracy Theories Part Two

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dont worry Craig, I will help you with your Topic Mastery when I come across the video with the 80+ names, again. Meanwhile other Topic Masters will howl that it is non-existent, as they must, due to their strict religious tenets.

I will have to look for it later. I should have saved it...example: The video you are currently pretending to Master is one I had lost track of until today.

It wouldn't particularly surprise me that 80 people representing both parties have been convicted of sex offense. In the Justice Department Crime statistics for just rape (not including other sexual offenses) the numbers of children as victims is in the tens of thousands.
 
Looks like it is 87. I searched some, they were true. Some of the anti pedo researchers are careful about their fats.



Maybe the guy's FB page below will help you find it.
Patriot Hour~ This Time They All Fall Down [ No Escape 87 Only Pain ]

or maybe this:
https://subdued-sort.glitch.me/channel/UCwJq9pqEEUr5_OmwBWQxDKA

or maybe search on bitchute, where endangered videos are protected from the likes of google, youTube, twitter

Of the 87, how many acted in concert with one another?
 
"Woefully underinformed" comes to mind. And willfully ignorant as well, as in cherry picking.

Its about the connected people, the social posts and tags etc.

Example: Not directly related, but the reason Christy Tiegen deleted hundreds (or thousands) of her old tweets could teach something to those Topic Masters with open minds, willing to learn.
Its not about a pizza shop with a nonexistent basement. Of course you and the friendly media, as always, focus on nonsense, rather than seriously looking into it. That ABC guy, Ben something, was the only TV guy to actually do an investigative report, but he did not track Alefantis' friends (cumbucket) and social media fingerprints.

It appears that she "cannot ******* STAND you idiots* anymore". As well as being concerned about the safety of her own children.

*ETA: I wonder if by ******* idiots she means the the Qtards?

https://www.cosmopolitan.com/entert...ked-one-million-twitter-users-deleted-tweets/
 
Last edited:
"Woefully underinformed" comes to mind. And willfully ignorant as well, as in cherry picking.

Its about the connected people, the social posts and tags etc.

Example: Not directly related, but the reason Christy Tiegen deleted hundreds (or thousands) of her old tweets could teach something to those Topic Masters with open minds, willing to learn.

Its not about a pizza shop with a nonexistent basement. Of course you and the friendly media, as always, focus on nonsense, rather than seriously looking into it. That ABC guy, Ben something, was the only TV guy to actually do an investigative report, but he did not track Alefantis' friends (cumbucket) and social media fingerprints.

Do the social media fingerprints establish the elements of a crime?
 
To see how google vs DuckDuckGo treat certain search terms, try the following search term at each site.

that ABC guy, Ben reported pizzagate
 
.
Seen online

Renowned epidemiologist sees 'massive disinformation campaign' against hydroxychloroquine

https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/me...mpaign-against-hydroxychloroquine/vi-BB18hVrG

Actual renowned epidemiologist says he's full of ****.

Dr. Fauci says all the ‘valid’ scientific data shows hydroxychloroquine isn’t effective in treating coronavirus

Debunked over and over and over, yet . . .

No hydroxychloroquine cure.

No blinded placebo controlled trials.

Not shown to be effective.

Just the plaintive bleating of Q-sheep.
 
Last edited:
You'd have to draw your own conclusions

No. All crimes have elements. To be guilty of a crime you have to have done some combination of the elements. So, using the crime I'm most familiar with, immigrant smuggling. The person has to have facilitated the entry to the US of a person. They have to know the person was not a citizen, national of the US. The person had to have knowledge the person they brought into the US was either inadmissible to the US OR they brought the person into the US avoiding lawful inspection at a designated port of entry.

Do the social media fingerprints meet the definition of any of the elements of any child sex crime?
 
How many of her pedophile related posts did you see before they were deleted?

Someone saved them before she deleted them. But you are not the least but interested, obviously.

Dude, nothing personal but I'm always suspicious of the crusader. With this particular crusade you're on, there's no way I'm clicking on your links.
 
"Woefully underinformed" comes to mind. And willfully ignorant as well, as in cherry picking.

Its about the connected people, the social posts and tags etc.

Example: Not directly related, but the reason Christy Tiegen deleted hundreds (or thousands) of her old tweets could teach something to those Topic Masters with open minds, willing to learn.

Its not about a pizza shop with a nonexistent basement. Of course you and the friendly media, as always, focus on nonsense, rather than seriously looking into it. That ABC guy, Ben something, was the only TV guy to actually do an investigative report, but he did not track Alefantis' friends (cumbucket) and social media fingerprints.

He wasn't with ABC. The lost time you brought him up, you lied and said he was with CBS when in fact, he worked for a local station that was an affiliate.

Which tweets implicate Ms. Tiegen in specific elements of a crime?
 
Some of the anti pedo researchers are careful about their fats.

I see. As Q-Anon's leading paedophile researcher, do you often have to be careful that you don't "crack a fat" when looking at the children?:p

So, you're saying Ghislaine Maxwell told you not to be upset Trump has chosen Ivanka, as you can look after Don Jr or Eric and extract Adrenachrome from them?

Have you thanked Ghislaine and Donald yet?
:p
 

Attachments

  • Trump children.jpg
    Trump children.jpg
    27.9 KB · Views: 3
  • maxwell and trump.JPG
    maxwell and trump.JPG
    36 KB · Views: 5
Dont worry Craig, I will help you with your Topic Mastery, next time I come across the video with the names of the 80+ democrat and republican child predators recently convicted.

Does the list of "80+ democrat and republican child predators" include Tom Hanks, Hillary Clinton, Steve Tyler, and other such satanic child-blood vampires that have been "arrested" but whose arrests are so super-duper top-secret that the police are providing them with green-screens so they can make video appearances where they pretend to the public they're not arrested?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom