Safe-Keeper
My avatar is not a Drumpf hat
And again this is a post-fact thinking. That some people disagree with the facts does not make opinions that agree with the facts just as incorrect as they are.
Troll, feed, don't, etc.
And again this is a post-fact thinking. That some people disagree with the facts does not make opinions that agree with the facts just as incorrect as they are.
I was with you all the way up to "[Trump] is planning..."
Can't see Trump planning.
Only if the order is legal. I do understand that this is a judgement call, in at least some cases.
But telling a military unit to, for instance, arrest or shoot all or only members of a recognized political party (Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, even American Nazi) is clearly not a legal order.
If you are going to whine again about the malapportionment feature then try not to be so misleading. You falsely imply that a vote in Wyoming is worth 800 times as much as a vote in California.
The fact is that Wyoming returns 3 EC votes at 16,667 voters per EC vote while California returns 57 EC votes at 701,754 voters per EC vote. So a vote in Wyoming is worth 42 times (not 800) times as much as a vote in California.
As already alluded to Trump passive aggressively declaring himself some sort of "True leader" in exile and spending the rest of his sad life fanning the conspiracy theories and inciting violence is much more likely.
Russia is going to be one of the few countries to recognise Trump's government in exile as the legitimate US leadership.![]()
Again "Trump is not going to accept the results of the election" is not the same thing as saying we're on a direct collision course with either a coup or a Civil War.
As already alluded to Trump passive aggressively declaring himself some sort of "True leader" in exile and spending the rest of his sad life fanning the conspiracy theories and inciting violence is much more likely.
So Trump is under the impression that not everybody there was a neo-Nazi. I don't know. Maybe he's right, and maybe he's wrong. You can believe what you like, but I honestly think the Democrats would be better off if they lent a little less hard on the facts. When Biden says "No, he called all those folks who walked out of that" it just isn't true.
I am concerned that the OP may well be correct. I suspect that Trump may have done something that will put him in prison if it ever comes out and knows it. Without "presidential immunity" and/or his people in charge of the executive and/or senate.
As already alluded to Trump passive aggressively declaring himself some sort of "True leader" in exile and spending the rest of his sad life fanning the conspiracy theories and inciting violence is much more likely.
What if he resigns so Pence can pardon him before the term ends?
I think the public passion for "Going after Trump" after he's out of office is a much bigger unknown variable then we're assuming.
Trump's base of supporters obviously won't want it, and I don't know how many of the other ~60% of Americans are going to really care after he's out of office and can no longer do (direct) damage.
That doesn't mean we can't, won't, or shouldn't do it, just a factor.
Exactly, you think he was wrong and that everybody at the rally were neo-Nazis. You can't prove he was wrong, you just think it.Trump would need to be right in order for Biden to be wrong.
In order for Trump to be right, we need evidence that there were people not affiliated with Neo-Nazis and white supremacists at the Neo-Nazi/white supremacist rally.
Do you have that evidence?
Or will you continue to pretend that Trump’s babbling double-speak is somehow the equivalent of a fact?
Exactly, you think he was wrong and that everybody at the rally were neo-Nazis.
WTF!!!!?? TOTAL NONSENSE!!!
The Democrats didn't contest the election.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...clinton-concedes-election-donald-trump-speech
OK. So it's specifically whether or not he will make a concession speech you are concerned about rather than whether he/the Republican's accept the result? I thought you were worried about some sort of a coup, or violence, or some corrupt way of on-doing a fair result. The distinction between the different ways one undoes an election result one doesn't like doesn't seem very important to me.
Yes, they did, in their limited version of the court of public opinion. That same silly mindset that assumed that Hillary was a shoe in. We see that happening with Biden to. Now get out there actually vote for the guy, or by mail but if there's dem complacency again, thats on them completely. COMPLETELY.
The entire country turning into a troll farm backed dictatorship is not a valid punishment for the Dems running a bad candidate.
"I voted to kicked in the balls because your offer was only a massage, not a massage with a happy ending" is a childish, psychopathic mentality.