Belz...
Fiend God
Good, maybe they'll vote for Biden.
Good, maybe they'll vote for Biden.
I'm baffled that so many are confused on how she can be African-American and from Jamaica. I mean where do they think that the black population of Jamaica came from? But they also seem stumped that someone can be from two places at once so these aren't exactly galaxy brains here.
Also I don't understand how her "not really" being African American is relevant.
Is she claiming her ancestors were American slaves struggling in the colonies or endured Jim Crow? Obama didn't pretend to be that either. And they pretty much grew up in the culture so to speak, to an extent.
I think it's more projection from the Birthers and Birther-curious.
Get out there and do what needs to be done if you want him to win, don't get complacent like Dems did with Hillary.
Also elected and re-elected as California Attorney General, another high-profile, high responsibility position.
Yeah but that's what also made the "LOokit me being more progressive than you, do love me now twitter" subgroup put her on an iceflow because when she was a prosecutor she made the unforgivable sin of prosecuting people.
Yeah but that's what also made the "LOokit me being more progressive than you, do love me now twitter" subgroup put her on an iceflow because when she was a prosecutor she made the unforgivable sin of prosecuting people.
They may be a timeline where that's true, but on ours the Trump campaign surely would have preferred:
Some on the right are already claiming that she slept her way into her career. Of course women can never achieve on their own.
Here is the contents of a tweet from the Trump campaign
These people are truly awful. Name calling. "Political living will". It's embarrassing.
I just hope it doesn't work.
Doesn't that mean that old attacks would have been factored in for most people already with Hillary, where as with Kamala there are potentially far more people for whom these things may come as news?I'm curious how this will work.
The vitriol directed towards Hillary was often quite sexist, but had decades of repetition to help normalize these attacks in the public.
Harris has only been on the national stage for a short time. I'm wondering if the sexism of such attacks will be grating to women who might be undecided, or if they won't care.
Doesn't that mean that old attacks would have been factored in for most people already with Hillary, where as with Kamala there are potentially far more people for whom these things may come as news?
I think you're missing the part where many people don't want Trump and are OK with either Biden or Harris becoming president.
ETA: Not sure what you mean by "swing voters ... on the Dem side." I don't think such people exist. If you're on the Dem side, you are not a swing voter.
We'll see. From my point of view, I think it's unrealistic to expect anybody to change their view of Trump based on anything he says on Kamala. Kamala still has the opportunity to make an impression, for good or for ill.I would contend that the party never really dealt with the baggage that came with Hillary properly, and that probably contributed a significant bit to her loss.
I just don't know if there's enough time to gin up the same level of hate, or if Harris is a high-profile enough character in the general public for such smears to stick. A lot of people probably don't know who she is.
She's a black(-ish) educated woman from California, with parents who were so foreign they weren't even born here, running on a Democratic ticket.
I don't think "Time in the public eye" is going to make a mote of difference in how much the Rightis going todoes hate her.