Cont: Qanon Conspiracy Theories Part Two

[Bubba]

Edited by zooterkin: 

<SNIP>
Edited for rule 0 and rule 12.

"Manufacturing Consent: The Five Filters of Mass Media.

by the listening post,

narrated by Amy Goodman, based on Noam Chomsky's work"

Edited by zooterkin: 

<SNIP>
Edited for rule 0 and rule 12.

 

[Matthew Ellard]

Edited by zooterkin: 

<SNIP>
Edited for rule 0 and rule 12.

Poor little Bubba and Polly want a cracker. You are always the last to work out you are being used by Trump and Rupert Murdoch.

"America’s Frontline Doctors” also appear to have ties to the Trump regime. In fact, one person who spoke at the press conference on Monday was at the White House for a round-table discussion just a couple of weeks ago and... (It’s) also no surprise that many of them have appeared on Fox News in recent months, the president’s favourite TV channel."

https://www.gizmodo.com.au/2020/07/...chloroquine-weirdos-banned-from-social-media/

 

[Matthew Ellard]

Dr. Daniel W. Erickson

"By the end of April, even Fox News’s Laura Ingraham had Erickson on to talk about his opinion on how to deal with covid-19, questioning the stay-at-home order in California. During another Fox News appearance in May, things took a weird turn when Erickson started spouting conspiracies involving George Soros trying to censor his message on herd immunity, according to the Washington Examiner.


“Look at what George Soros said about Facebook back in February,” Erickson told Fox News. “He said Mark Zuckerberg should no longer have control of Facebook. Well, YouTube, you’re going to be next. Soros will say that you should no longer have control, and government should have control of Facebook, according to George Soros.”
https://www.gizmodo.com.au/2020/07/...chloroquine-weirdos-banned-from-social-media/


So Bubba? Did Facebook or You Tube change hands? Did Soros say this at all? Nope.........

Do you think Trump should control Facebook and You Tube....or George Soros?

 

[Childlike Empress]

Did Soros say this at all? Nope.........

NYT: George Soros: Mark Zuckerberg Should Not Be in Control of Facebook

 

[Belz...]

Edited by zooterkin: 

<SNIP>
Edited for rule 0 and rule 12.

You are in no position to evaluate other people's skepticism.

 

[Belz...]

Edited by zooterkin: 

<SNIP>
Edited for rule 0 and rule 12.

Go ahead, tell me what was wrong with my post. You did NOT, in fact, post a link to support your claim. You just made the claim and expected to be believed. But contrary to your claims, a 'real' skeptic would demand evidence.

 

[eerok]

A Bubba Glossary:

"fake skeptic" = shooting the messenger, which is something Bubba claims to hate even when that's almost all he does

"ad hominem" = legitimate news sources can be dismissed for no good reason, but Bubba's favorite screaming nutbars are sacred and can't be questioned

"Topic Master" = Bubba really wants to swear at us, but he's afraid of getting into trouble

 

[Cosmic Yak]

Pneunomia.



I was kind of hoping, after Pneunomiagate, that you would have learned to check your information before posting it.
Did you actually read any of those studies before you posted that link?
I'm asking because, as I have actually looked at some of them, that information is seriously out of date.
For example, there is mention of China recommending chloroquine as a Covid treatment.
That lasted a matter of days before they withdrew that recommendation and warned about the lethal side effects that you seem not to accept.
https://fortune.com/2020/03/20/mala...reatment-chloroquine-trump-musk-deadly-china/

So, once again: did you read those studies before you posted, and did you check whether they are still accepted?

Not peer reviewed as far as I know...
Most papers have a website;

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1545C_dJWMIAgqeLEsfo2U8Kq5WprDuARXrJl6N1aDjY/preview


http://www.cadureso.com/actualite/a...h-papers-and-reports-january-to-april-20-2020

Posting the same link again, I see.
Have you actually checked this information, Bubba?

 

[Resume]

Edited by zooterkin: 

<SNIP>
Edited for rule 0 and rule 12.

attempt to discredit doctors in the field healing covid 19 with NCQz.

There is no credible evidence these "doctors" cured anything. They gulled you however.

 

[sts60]

To me, the most hilarious thing about the ‘Q’ fantasy is the idea of Donald Trump as some sort of crusading tough guy. The same guy who just had a snap press event called... because Barack Obama was eulogizing John Lewis live over the big cable news networks. (They stayed with the eulogy, and that includes Fox.)

This kind of utterly transparent jealousy is funny and innocent when one of my dogs demands to get scratched when they see the other one getting an ear scratch. It’s just pathetic when it’s the President trying - and failing - to get attention for his latest temper tantrum. But that’s the ‘Q’ dolts’ big hero for ya.

 

[Matthew Ellard]

There is no credible evidence these "doctors" cured anything.

Yep. As she is already claiming religious magic, I'm wondering if Stella Immanuel will claim God infected 350 members of her church and then god gave her the power to cure them that same day.

She is definitely into money making.

"Immanuel is also a 'wealth transfer coach' and believes 'you can be saved, anointed, fire brand and wealthy too."
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ys-Jesus-destroy-Facebook-removing-video.html

 

[RolandRat]

Yep. As she is already claiming religious magic, I'm wondering if Stella Immanuel will claim God infected 350 members of her church and then god gave her the power to cure them that same day.

She is definitely into money making.

"Immanuel is also a 'wealth transfer coach' and believes 'you can be saved, anointed, fire brand and wealthy too."
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ys-Jesus-destroy-Facebook-removing-video.html

No, no, no. You are doing it wrong. When someone who claims to be an authority figure makes unevidenced claims, you absolutely cannot bring up previous unevidenced claims.

The very idea that medical "professionals" whose claims include having sex with demons in your dreams brings on medical conditions, referencing those claims to cast aspersions on other unevidenced claims is preposterous.

Their unevidenced claims must be refuted and debated otherwise you are indulging in censorship. #crackpotsviewsmatter.

 

[Matthew Ellard]

No, no, no. You are doing it wrong. When someone who claims to be an authority figure makes unevidenced claims, you absolutely cannot bring up previous unevidenced claims.

I don't know how it works in USA state registration, but in Australia, a doctor must be a fit and proper person to be registered and this takes in all previous claims, as assessed by a tribunal.

 

[catsmate]

Link is dead. Youtube does it in minutes now. And it happens internationally. One of the most

competent critics

nutty conspiracy loons in Germany, Sucharit Bhakdi (of Thailand origin hence the name) wanted to publish a book on amazon a month or so ago, and at the last day amazon told him they wouldn't do it. So he published it with a smaller (Swiss IIRC) publisher and when it became a bestseller, the rats at amazon added it to their program. It's still number one on German amazon's "all books" top list today.

Good to see the tech companies cracking down on nutters peddling, and profiting from, dangerous lies for stupid people.

 

[catsmate]

One of the people who foresaw this big tech censorship is James Corbett who hosts his stuff on his own website for years. But now we are at simply disappearing dissident domains so this is no final solution either.

But his recent documentary Who is Bill Gates can and should still be watched.

Corbett the multiply exposed liar? The nutter who claimed the polio vaccine paralysed half a million children? The idiot who claimed Gates stole from QDOS?
The nutter who claimed Gates flew with Epstein? The whackjob who lies about GMOs?

Maybe you should start thinking for yourself and stop parroting liars and idiots....

 

[Craig4]

To me, the most hilarious thing about the ‘Q’ fantasy is the idea of Donald Trump as some sort of crusading tough guy. The same guy who just had a snap press event called... because Barack Obama was eulogizing John Lewis live over the big cable news networks. (They stayed with the eulogy, and that includes Fox.)

This kind of utterly transparent jealousy is funny and innocent when one of my dogs demands to get scratched when they see the other one getting an ear scratch. It’s just pathetic when it’s the President trying - and failing - to get attention for his latest temper tantrum. But that’s the ‘Q’ dolts’ big hero for ya.

I'm pretty sure, an anti-pedophilia crusader would probably not wish someone in jail awaiting trial for child sex trafficking well.

 

[EHocking]

When I was in the Army, you always made sure to have your shot record available.

Just in case you were accused of War Crimes by a CTer on ISF?

 

[sts60]

I'm pretty sure, an anti-pedophilia crusader would probably not wish someone in jail awaiting trial for child sex trafficking well.

There’s almost no type of wretched behavior alleged of others by the ‘Q’ dolts that is not pure projection of Trump’s behaviors. Some are criminal, some are degenerate, but they are basically all Trump.

Except I don’t accuse Trump of cannibalism. That’s original ‘Q’ stupidity. But the ‘Q’ pinheads eagerly lap it up and regurgitate its all the same.

 

[Hans]

I'm pretty sure, an anti-pedophilia crusader would probably not wish someone in jail awaiting trial for child sex trafficking well.

NO, no its all part of the very clever plan....just wait.

 

[Allen773]

NO, no its all part of the very clever plan....just wait.

17th-dimensional chess!