Qanon Conspiracy theories

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bubba said:
As a rule, Topic Masters will admit they see themselves as a smart, tough crowd, especially when in gangswagger mode.
Click to expand...

You won't find many Q allies on a skeptic site, because the only evidence so far is of Q failing miserably at predicting anything, not to mention that the claims are absurd. It may seem like people are ganging up on you, but you could remedy this by dropping ridiculous CTs, and showing more respect for reality.

As for the work of Blake Lively and Salma Hayek in supporting the fight against child porn, child sex abuse, and child sex trafficking, good for them. I hope they make a difference and help protect some children.

This has nothing to do with Q and his BS, though.
 
eerok said:
You won't find many Q allies on a skeptic site, because the only evidence so far is of Q failing miserably at predicting anything, not to mention that the claims are absurd. It may seem like people are ganging up on you, but you could remedy this by dropping ridiculous CTs, and showing more respect for reality.

As for the work of Blake Lively and Salma Hayek in supporting the fight against child porn, child sex abuse, and child sex trafficking, good for them. I hope they make a difference and help protect some children.

This has nothing to do with Q and his BS, though.
Click to expand...



Pretty fair, thanks, except for the yellow part which came from your anti skeptic tricky evil twin, Topic Master.

The difference between what Q and his followers represent, and your "reality"
is a matter of, for example, is spotting who pushes false narratives and what they do not report on. If you haven't, reading Caitlin Johnstone on narratives explains how a nation can be led by the nose given sufficient control of narrative. Same goes for the world, where centralized info sources come into play. About five corporations control the narrative in America.


https://caitlinjohnstone.com
 
Matthew Ellard said:
How are you displaying courage by posting Robert Steele's fantasies about kidnapped children on spaceships to Mars, as your best evidence?
:crazy:
Click to expand...


But it worked OK otherwise


Look what it drew out from under the bridge, for all to see
 
Last edited:
JayUtah said:
It would be great if one more Hollywood mother stood up with Blake Lively.

The chain reaction could disinfect that cesspool.

Who is with me?
Click to expand...
Nobody.


JayUtah said:
Her video again for your convenience:

https://variety.com/video/blake-live...d-pornography/
Click to expand...

If by convenience you mean toilet, then sure.


I have two of my own kids. Who am I kidding, My eldest will legally be an adult in a couple of weeks and will thus become executor of my last will and testament. Nevertheless, I have had to insist they stay away from here.

Because they want to verbally kick seven shades out of this bucket of crap you post and they would not be in any way temperate. They are not members here, but I am and they do read your baloney proposals and propositions.

And they keep asking me. Why do you tolerate such an utter fiasco of nonsense?

And I keep answering them, somebody has to take a stand against this nonsense.

Just look in the other thread. I spoon fed you the breakdown of exactly why you were flat out wrong. Your response? "Thank you" and then blast on as though that never happened and the next crankery is somehow more important
 
Resume said:
Which has exactly jack **** to do with the troll who calls himself Q.
Click to expand...



Oh little grasshopper, patience.



eerok said:
You won't find many Q allies on a skeptic site, because the only evidence so far is of Q failing miserably at predicting anything, not to mention that the claims are absurd. It may seem like people are ganging up on you, but you could remedy this by dropping ridiculous CTs, and showing more respect for reality.

As for the work of Blake Lively and Salma Hayek in supporting the fight against child porn, child sex abuse, and child sex trafficking, good for them. I hope they make a difference and help protect some children.

This has nothing to do with Q and his BS, though.
Click to expand...



There you go again with your "reality" misconception .

See Q 1201 -1215. April 20 2018


Now stand up and tell the class what 1214 says, and who is linked to Alefantis
 
Last edited:
Bubba said:
Oh little grasshopper, patience.
Click to expand...

Never, ever.

No frogmarching.

No gitmo.

No OBAMAGATE!!

No JFK JR. resurrection.

No Q, just Q-sheep gulled by a troll. Over and over and over.

Bah-bah-bah, they bleat.
 
eerok said:
You won't find many Q allies on a skeptic site, because the only evidence so far is of Q failing miserably at predicting anything, not to mention that the claims are absurd. It may seem like people are ganging up on you, but you could remedy this by dropping ridiculous CTs, and showing more respect for reality.

As for the work of Blake Lively and Salma Hayek in supporting the fight against child porn, child sex abuse, and child sex trafficking, good for them. I hope they make a difference and help protect some children.
Click to expand...


You think this is a real skeptic site ? Maybe it was long ago.
 
kookbreaker said:
In case you thought this stuff had no real effect or that this conspiracy nonsense was actually doing some kind of good (or that it’s proponents are heroes).

The Polaris Project has released a statement that the Wayfair BS is clogging their system and hotlines.

https://polarisproject.org/press-releases/polaris-statement-on-wayfair-sex-trafficking-claims/
Click to expand...

Yes rising public interest will have good and bad side effect.

Had you gone positive rather than negative, you would have noted that the increased interest will raise awareness, which will lead to more participation, more tips to police hotlines, increased support for Polaris, and Child Rescue coalition etc

Have you noticed public awareness of the problem is rising.?
 
abaddon said:
Just look in the other thread. I spoon fed you the breakdown of exactly why you were flat out wrong. Your response? "Thank you" and then blast on as though that never happened and the next crankery is somehow more important
Click to expand...



Maybe my browser is messed up but your quotes are leading Me to a Jay Utah post in another thread?
 
Bubba said:
There you go again with your "reality" misconception .
Click to expand...

Bubba. As you didn't notice, everyone is already laughing at your "reality". You claimed that children are kidnapped and sent on a 20 year space trip to Mars to become the slaves of peadophiles.

As you can't count, you haven't realised all these children would be over 20 years old when they arrived on Mars. They would be adults.:crazy:
 
Unless it is a faked video, this guy irrefutably shows, step by step, how Russian search engine Yandex is an 'on ramp' to pedo trafficking sites. He says "whether or not Yandex knows it is happening."

He mixes Tom Hanks in since Hanks published a "lost glove" pic with numbers and letters that function as an access code. The code opens the 'on ramp' only on Yandex. Results on the other search engines were 'normal random'.


The Yandex part is simply there to see, unless the imagery is faked. I saw Yandex implicated somewhere else recently, but I dont recall where it was. Possibly around the Wayfair claims.

I dont know how the Yandex part can be wrong, unless it is faked.

Tom Hanks is probably clueless about what he published, whether he took the pic himself or not.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8yat9S0n5aE
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom