Passenger killed by air marshall

It could be a scientist or a programmer or some such. It could be nature itself, it could be a stick. I don't know, since the Decloration of Independece does not specify I just don't know; I thought you might know since you are asking.
Rrrrrrrrrright........ A "scientist". A "stick".
 
Makes no difference. The point is that the rights are given by a supernatural force.

What god isn't supernatural?

1. The Declaration of Independance is not part of our government, it's part of the historical progression to the founding of our country.

2. The Constitution states that our rights come from people.
 
What is the difference? Why are you getting hung up on this? Is there a specific reason? Is it sorta a "gotcha" thing? Why not fill in the blank and then make your point?

I'm not getting hung up on this. Just pointing out that the rights in the Declaration of Independence is given to Americans by a supernatural being.
 
Too subtle? Has this already been pointed out?
McAlhany said he "absolutely never heard the word 'bomb' at all."

"The first time I heard the word 'bomb' was when I was interviewed by the FBI," McAlhany said. "They kept asking if I heard him say the B-word. And I said, 'What is the B-word?' And they were like, 'Bomb.' I said no. They said, 'Are you sure?' And I am."

Added another passenger, Mary Gardner: "I did not hear him say that he had a bomb."
 
I'm not getting hung up on this. Just pointing out that the rights in the Declaration of Independence is given to Americans by a supernatural being.

err no, not really. The Constitution defines the power of the government and sets out some law.

We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

In fact, the word "God" does not appear in the Constitution.

The Declaration of Independence is errr... a Declaration of Independence from England.

Just to be abundently clear: you do understand now that the DOI does not frame our law, yes or no.
 
Last edited:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=16055

Lest we forget... that Sky Marshall will never know how lucky he was that the irrational, babbling person on that plane wasn't Claus, 'cuz Claus is a big tough guy when it comes to guns on planes.

By the way, Claus, since you're so hung up on the mention of "creator" in a non-legal document (again, just like you do ever two months or so), who or what gives you the "right" to attack and kill a badge-carrying officer of the law?
 
I'm not getting hung up on this. Just pointing out that the rights in the Declaration of Independence is given to Americans by a supernatural being.

Except, that it doesn't. You are wrong "their Creator" may refer to supernatural being or it could refer to your parents. The reason the word "their" was used was so that individuals can choose to believe what that creator is.
 
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=16055

Lest we forget... that Sky Marshall will never know how lucky he was that the irrational, babbling person on that plane wasn't Claus, 'cuz Claus is a big tough guy when it comes to guns on planes.

By the way, Claus, since you're so hung up on the mention of "creator" in a non-legal document (again, just like you do ever two months or so), who or what gives you the "right" to attack and kill a badge-carrying officer of the law?
Wow, I never knew about that. I mean, I knew he was a babbling moron. But I never knew he was THAT much of a babbling moron.

Has anyone told the TSA, so they ban him from any flights to the US, based on his claim that he will attack an air marshall on sight? I might do that. I think it would be pretty funny. :)
 
Wow, I never knew about that. I mean, I knew he was a babbling moron. But I never knew he was THAT much of a babbling moron.

Has anyone told the TSA, so they ban him from any flights to the US, based on his claim that he will attack an air marshall on sight? I might do that. I think it would be pretty funny. :)

Sure, do it. God knows there's nothing a Eurosnob loves more than a reason to feel put upon by an American. It would make his year.
 
He thinks the air marshall program is wrong? Should the skyways be free of police and laws? WTF?
 
He thinks the air marshall program is wrong? Should the skyways be free of police and laws? WTF?
No, just free of guns. Since they are magical, mythical devices that turn any normal person into an insane killing machine. Their very existence is to blame for all evils. Including the movie "Ishtar".
 
He thinks the air marshall program is wrong? Should the skyways be free of police and laws? WTF?

Obviously you've never seen Claus perform a lethal exercise in Tae Kwon Dane, or you'd realize that guns are useless as a means of force. After all, he declared his intention to kill instantly, no questions asked, upon detection of a gun in the cabin.

You don't need the law. Claus is the law. ;)
 
Even if that is the case, I would still put the blame on him, his wife, his family, his friends, his doctors, etc. Sounds like he shouldn't have been out in public (and this is coming from someone who does take a lot of psychotropic medications to treat debilitating mental illness.)

The police should not stop and say "Oh, okay", just when someone says "Hey, he's sick! He's off his meds!" That would be a very easy way to stop police intervention, that the bad guys could take advantage of.
esp. nowdays. Bingo.

I'm sorry if the guy had mental problems and it's a tragedy, but yet I applaud the air marshall doing his job and if he catches ANY flak about this, whoever is responsible should be the next on the firing line.

(PS can you guys spare us the religious tangent already....there's plenty of that in the applicable forum, plus change.)
 

Back
Top Bottom