Can't say I have seen you say that before, but I take you at your word.
Now that I have seen it, I have experience in that arena. Both as a recipient and an evil bastard auditor poking in things not meant to see the light of day.
I confess, I never considered it in that light. But you are correct. Reflecting on it, would any police department anywhere pass? And I cannot think of a single one. Anywhere.
Even not considering the portions that are specific to business (accountability to those with a financial interest in the business gets subsumed into all the considerations for accountability to clients and vendors), probably not.
Problem solving transparency, data validity, continuing improvement, valid third party oversight and audits...yeah, probably none in the US at least would pass. That they often rely on 'COA with a checkbox' mentality not only creates needlessly long paperwork that doesn't even solve the problems they claim they are trying to address, but makes things actively harder on the police themselves! You can't just say, 'we did x to solve problem y', you have to show that doing that was
effective. But that would require data that not only do police not collect, it requires data they
refuse to collect.
Measures must be effective, tested, and supported by data. The fact that 'warrior cop'
ever became a thing shows just how little US police go by evidence, critical thinking, or even just common sense.
It's deplorable.
EDIT: One 50k a year auditor a police station with proper power/oversight/protections would be a force multiplier that could save millions each organization a year. Quality saves Warranty, and when warranty is paid in lives and freedom, you'd think it would be valued more.