PartSkeptic’s Thread for Predictions and Other Matters of Interest

[Matthew Ellard]

The prediction

29/09/2019
One communication (with confirmatory events following it) was that there will soon be a big reduction in population. God will not let humankind destroy the world he has made. "Soon" meaning in time to make a difference.

The world's population is increasing by 81 million a year.
The world's deaths from Covid-19 is currently 529,000.

Therefore the world's population is not reducing and the prediction is complete nonsense.

 

[PartSkeptic]

EHT told the FCC what the public wants:


“We recommend a halt to the roll-out of the fifth generation, 5G, for telecommunication and a halt to the expansion of wireless networks until hazards for human health and the environment of these new frequencies and the densification of networks have been fully investigated by scientists independent from industry.

"5G paired with densification of 4G or other antennas will substantially increase environmental exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. We also recommend federally developed safety limits based on empirical scientific studies that have thoroughly investigated long-term effects to humans, animals, insects, trees, and the environment.

"Federal safety limits should be based on adequate data from animal and human research, not based on assumptions.”


See also https://ehtrust.org/eht-takes-the-fcc-to-court/
...Yet the FCC ignored the science and, in December 2019, declaring that it would retain the existing antiquated and inadequate standards, terminated the Notice of Inquiry. The FCC even further asserted without evidence that the same approach would prove relevant to 5G.

and
https://lawandcrime.com/administrat...35dxCPf0YVd_55ozuFjTtFSFVZZmYgdRBciyRBcLcTkzw

...The existing regulations were promulgated in 1996 based on scientific data from 1992...

 

[PartSkeptic]

Hold on a sec, let's be fair here.

He predicted Trump would win the nomination! Except that prediction was made after Trump was the runaway favorite. He tends to omit that part.

He predicted Trump would win the general! Except that's more or less a coin flip.

After Trump won the election but before inauguration, he predicted that Trump would succeed in becoming POTUS! Yes, you read that right.

These earth shattering predictions came to him via tarot cards.

It's like shooting darts at a board where the bullseye is the size of a tractor wheel. And then bragging about the bullseyes.

Rubbish. Get your facts right. Made when people scoffed about him entering the election race. He was long shot. Give the date of the ORIGINAL prediction. Pixel42 should remember it.

 

[PartSkeptic]

I do not mind the nasty (and often false) slander and statements as long as there is something to be learned. At the moment this has descended into nothing but nastiness.

I have already learned how people can distort and abuse others. Nothing relevant to report now. I can see the trend now. As I post less, posters are burying this thread with garbage so that anyone visiting here gets the wrong idea.

I went to the tower house and did not wear the body shield. I got stomach pains and some internal bleeding. Am fixing the bleeding. Yesterday I went to the shops and forgot my head shield. I paid for that lapse of memory with a nasty dull headache.

My expectations were that my exposure would be minimal each time. But apparently my subconscious decides to make me ill - or so say people here - because they say it cannot be cause and effect. Yeah right.

I need to get things done, so don't expect much from me. I am taking strain with the pain and tiredness. I took my first Jacuzzi dip yesterday. Helped a lot. But I need to continue with the insulation and timer so I can have it hot first thing in the morning.

Just remember my prediction. The damage done by the pandemic (and associated problems) will only ease up once humankind gets more spiritual. It is going to get much worse.

I just did the Tarot cards for my wife on an important matter. Both of us did not like the answer. But we both now see I was right. Have I forgotten any recent times I was wrong? Nope. It would be memorable if I was wrong.

 

[PartSkeptic]

The prediction



The world's population is increasing by 81 million a year.
The world's deaths from Covid-19 is currently 529,000.

Therefore the world's population is not reducing and the prediction is complete nonsense.

Have patience. God is patient and wants the world to learn lessons. Humankind is slow to learn. This lesson will take time, and will be painful.

It is like the Herxheimer reaction. When the body starts to heal it feels even worse because of the dead cells it must get rid of. In complex situations, the short term effects dominate to go the other way.

Another example is terminal lucidity. People can behave as if nothing is wrong a few days before they die. I saw it my father.

 

[Pixel42]

Rubbish. Get your facts right. Made when people scoffed about him entering the election race. He was long shot. Give the date of the ORIGINAL prediction. Pixel42 should remember it.

What I remember is compiling a list of your Trump predictions which credited you with hits which other posters questioned due to the timeline.

From a post I made on 13th August 2017:

One thing I did find whilst searching for previous discussions were several about the Trump predictions, pointing out for example that the "Trump will win the nomination" one was made when that was pretty much a foregone conclusion etc.

So I suspect varwoche is right.

But by all means correct both our memories by pointing to the post in which you made the "Trump will win the nomination" prediction so we can see the date it was made was indeed when he was still a "long shot".

 

[Matthew Ellard]

Have patience. God is patient and wants the world to learn lessons.

So your "god" who sends you messages, is reducing the world's population by increasing it?

Can you see that that makes no sense and your prediction is obviously complete rubbish.

 

[Pixel42]

I did a search and found this post by PartSkeptic made on 3rd April 2016:

Predictions as to whether Trump will be President.

Here is what the Tarot cards say: (for fun)

1. Will Trump win the nomination?
Trump has a strong interest in success, and he will win it in a business-like manner. There will be renewed ideas and possible social unrest with labor support for him.

2. Will Trump win the Presidential election?
Trump will pander to the masses, and to the mainstream religions. He will win an emotional victory. But he will face opposition from forces that will not want to recognize him. However, he will bull his way through with determination and achieve cooperation and balance.

3. Repeat. Will he win the election?
It is going to be a tough nasty fight. But yes. There will be fresh opportunities that will open up.

4. Repeat. Will he be sworn in as President?
Trump is going to cause disruption to the old ways. The establishment will be defeated. But yes he will be sworn in.

5. Will Trump stay the full first term?
Yes. He will do the right things. The outcome for the country will be very good.

Specific enough for you skeptics?

My personal comment: One cannot make an omelette without cracking a few eggs.

That does seem quite early for the nomination prediction, though of course others are highly questionable. "He will do the right things. The outcome for the country will be very good." is downright laughable.

ETA: Looking earlier on that thread, Trump was being described as the probable nominee in mid March. So maybe not that early after all.

 

[Pixel42]

I do not mind the nasty (and often false) slander and statements as long as there is something to be learned. At the moment this has descended into nothing but nastiness.

Several people are still putting time and effort into trying to teach and help you. There's impatience, understandably, but surprisingly little nastiness in the circumstances, and that's mostly from you.

My expectations were that my exposure would be minimal each time. But apparently my subconscious decides to make me ill - or so say people here - because they say it cannot be cause and effect.

It's entirely possible it's cause and effect. But nothing you have done has established that, let alone - if that is so - what that cause is.

Just remember my prediction. The damage done by the pandemic (and associated problems) will only ease up once humankind gets more spiritual. It is going to get much worse.

Give me a date on which we can decide whether that prediction has been fulfilled, and what the criteria should be for that assessment. Without both it's a worthless prediction.

If you ignore that question like you ignore most others I will choose both myself.

BTW it's now eight weeks since you agreed to do a simple blind test of your claim to be able to tell whether or not the wifi is switched on from your physical symptoms.

 

[abaddon]

<snip for brevity>

What PartSkeptic believes right now will be different in a minute. I know this because my Tarot cards told me so.

 

[Cosmic Yak]

I do not mind the nasty (and often false) slander and statements

Manifestly not true. Pretty much all you do now is whine about how badly you think you're being treated.

as long as there is something to be learned.

It remains unclear what, if anything, you have learned during your time on this forum.

At the moment this has descended into nothing but nastiness.

Actually, the only one being nasty is you. You refuse to answer questions, you refuse to supply evidence for your claims, and complain constantly about how horrible and mean everyone else is.
No-one is being nasty to you. If you think they are, quote the posts you have in mind, and report the offenders. Simple.

I have already learned how people can distort and abuse others.

On this forum? Again, quote them and report them. I will be among the first to express my condemnation.

Nothing relevant to report now. I can see the trend now. As I post less, posters are burying this thread with garbage so that anyone visiting here gets the wrong idea.

Aside from the inevitable appeal to the lurkers, I object strongly to your characterisation of my posts as 'garbage'. I have supported my points with direct references to the court documents you yourself linked to. I have repeatedly asked you to do the same- not rejected your conclusions, not mocked you, merely asked you to show your evidence. I have avoided the kinds of personal attacks you claim are made on you all the time. I have linked to medical evidence, from authorities you yourself agree are trustworthy.
Kindly quote any of my posts you think are 'garbage', and let the lurkers decide for themselves.

My expectations were that my exposure would be minimal each time. But apparently my subconscious decides to make me ill - or so say people here - because they say it cannot be cause and effect. Yeah right.

The WHO says it is, at least partly, psychosomatic. You cite the WHO as a valid authority on health matters. This is not 'people here' saying this: this is the conclusion of qualified professionals whose conclusions you yourself trust.

 

[varwoche]

I did a search and found this post by PartSkeptic made on 3rd April 2016:



That does seem quite early for the nomination prediction, though of course others are highly questionable. "He will do the right things. The outcome for the country will be very good." is downright laughable.

ETA: Looking earlier on that thread, Trump was being described as the probable nominee in mid March. So maybe not that early after all.

Indeed. That was after super tuesday. Trump was the runaway favorite.

@PS The facts surrounding this asinine prediction are in plain view. You have not been slandered. While this doesn't relate to your pandemic prediction, it might help you see the way that you weave false positives.

 

[varwoche]

Rubbish. Get your facts right. Made when people scoffed about him entering the election race. He was long shot. Give the date of the ORIGINAL prediction. Pixel42 should remember it.

By all means, help me get my facts straight. When I challenged this nonsense a long time ago, you fell silent.

If you predicted that Trump would win the nomination before he was the run-away favorite -- before super tuesday -- prove it.

I urge you to take a look at the 2016 primary timeline, down the page.

 

[JayUtah]

I do not mind the nasty (and often false) slander and statements as long as there is something to be learned. At the moment this has descended into nothing but nastiness.

A lot of people are learning in this thread. You're not one of them, because you seem to think you know it all already. And they're not learning from you, because you're simply wrong on so many points, and you get very angry when people correct you -- even when that correction is intended to help you. You have nothing to offer, and you believe you have nothing you need to receive. Tuning in every day to see who you're calling ignorant for disagreeing with you gets old.

And yes, you do mind. Because complaining about your allegedly shabby treatment is pretty much what you do several times a day when you get backed into a corner on matters of facts or history. Sometimes it's all you do. It's your escape route. Unfortunately it's just one of the many things you claim that is simply not true. At least as far as the moderators are concerned, nobody is being nasty to you. People are not buying your act, but that doesn't make them nasty.

I have already learned how people can distort and abuse others. Nothing relevant to report now. I can see the trend now. As I post less, posters are burying this thread with garbage so that anyone visiting here gets the wrong idea.

No, there's no conspiracy to squelch you. You're the one flooding the thread with pointless and increasingly irrelevant anecdotes.

But we both now see I was right. Have I forgotten any recent times I was wrong? Nope. It would be memorable if I was wrong.

I've pointed out several times in this thread where your claims have been wrong. And I supplied the facts that showed you were wrong. You complained that I was personally attacking you, and that my posts were too laborious for you to read. No, I don't think you can say you have a rational view or a good memory of just how wrong you are. Your errors are quite memorable to others, but if they happen to mention it, they get a tongue-lashing from you.

If you want to go through the rest of your life under the delusion of infallibility, that's your business. But you're dragging others into it, which makes it their business too. If your loved ones want to endure it, that's their business. The courts have already indicated their displeasure, which you seem disinclined to accept. And here, if you insist on trying to make others dance to your tune, you will continue to be disappointed.

 

[varwoche]

I urge you to take a look at the 2016 primary timeline, down the page.

I'm going to detail the timeline to avoid obfuscation:

Feb 1 Iowa: Cruz
Feb 9 New Hampshire: TrumpFeb 20 South Caroline: TrumpFeb 23 Nevada: TrumpMar 1 Alabama: TrumpMar 1 Alaska: Cruz
Mar 1 Arkansas: TrumpMar 1 Georgia: TrumpMar 1 Massachusetts: TrumpMar 1 Minnesota: Rubio
Mar 1 Oklahoma: Cruz
Mar 1 Tennessee: TrumpMar 1 Texas: Cruz
Mar 1 Vermont: TrumpMar 1 Virginia: TrumpMar 5 Kansas: Cruz
Mar 5 Kentucky: TrumpMar 5 Louisiana: TrumpMar 5 Maine: Cruz
Mar 5 Idaho : Cruz
Mar 5 Wyoming: Cruz
Mar 8 Hawaii: TrumpMar 8 Michigan: TrumpMar 8 Mississippi: TrumpMar 15 Florida: TrumpMar 15 Illinois: TrumpMar 15 Missouri: TrumpMar 15 North Carolina: TrumpMar 22 Arizona: TrumpMar 22 Utah: Cruz
Apr 3 PREDICTION

It's worse than it looks on the surface. Trump was winning larger states while Cruz was winning smaller states (excepting Texas, his home state).

 

[PartSkeptic]

By all means, help me get my facts straight. When I challenged this nonsense a long time ago, you fell silent.

If you predicted that Trump would win the nomination before he was the run-away favorite -- before super tuesday -- prove it.

I urge you to take a look at the 2016 primary timeline, down the page.

It was only when Trump ACTUALLY won the election that people thought it possible. My prediction was 2 April 2016.

What you forget is that I am not giving my opinion or doing a cold reading. I lay out cards which said without doubt that Trump would win. You should have seen the responses. Sarcasm and laughter.

I did the reading to illustrate how one can use Tarot cards WITHOUT very much personal input. I asked 5 questions and each one was correct. What people do is attempt to twist a simple answer into something that can be interpreted as incorrect.

You are now doing the same. Trying to prove that a Trump win was inevitable. Who thought Hillary would lose? Did you? Do you have a nearby tower messing with your memory?

On a personal level I "knew" that the Brits would vote for a Brexit. No cards needed there.

I also "knew" that the stock market would crash vary badly in 1987 Black Monday. And I foresaw the 2008 market crash - in this one I confirmed using the Tarot cards. In these tow cases, I advised my then partner to sell property and to cash in investments. They took my advice just in time.

I do not care that you do not believe. You have free will. Those who do believe and understand how the rules of the supernatural work will benefit. I am of the opinion that being a "believer" in God will help people who get Covid. One would have to do a study to proof this, but I see enough examples of help.

 

[PartSkeptic]

(snip)

If you want to go through the rest of your life under the delusion of infallibility, that's your business. But you're dragging others into it, which makes it their business too. If your loved ones want to endure it, that's their business. The courts have already indicated their displeasure, which you seem disinclined to accept. And here, if you insist on trying to make others dance to your tune, you will continue to be disappointed.

You need a FTFY namely

The Courts have already indicated their CAPTURE AND CORRUPTION.
If you cannot see that then it is because you do not want to see it. No wonder the world needs a cleansing. I admit I was naive enough to think the ConCourt worked by the rules and by justice. I was wrong.

But it has given me ammunition to fight a cause. Which I will do. I have no illusion about the power of the Telcos. They will not lose in the short term. They have the money and the power. But eventually the truth WILL come out.

 

[Cosmic Yak]

You need a FTFY namely

The Courts have already indicated their CAPTURE AND CORRUPTION.

FTFTFY. You have claimed that the Courts have already indicated their CAPTURE AND CORRUPTION without providing a single piece of evidence to support this.

If you cannot see that then it is because you do not want to see it.

No, we cannot see it because you consistently refuse to show any kind of evidence for it.
An issue you could easily fix, if you were so minded.

No wonder the world needs a cleansing. I admit I was naive enough to think the ConCourt worked by the rules and by justice. I was wrong.

No. You are sore because your attempts to subvert the course of impartial justice were thwarted. You have admitted attempting this.
You are also upset because, just as has happened here, your floods of anecdotes, unsupported assertions and appeals to pseudo-scientific quackery were rejected by the court.

But it has given me ammunition to fight a cause. Which I will do. I have no illusion about the power of the Telcos. They will not lose in the short term. They have the money and the power. But eventually the truth WILL come out.

Yup. Everyone else is wrong and you are right. If anyone disagrees with you, it's because they are corrupt and evil and mean and smelly.
Or.......

 

[varwoche]

It was only when Trump ACTUALLY won the election that people thought it possible. My prediction was 2 April 2016.

You're flat out making stuff up. This is obvious from the timeline, which I now regret posting.

Even though it's off topic, I assumed it was indisputable even by you, and would not lead to debate. Rather, I thought it would provide you with a clear example of how you weave false positives. And that you would reflect on it.

 

[PartSkeptic]

How is this for some prophetic writing on my part! We need a change in direction from the latest attempts to rewrite the history of my Trump prediction.

This was the foreword to a book I wrote in 1992. I never put it out for publication. My late wife (a Californian who did some fund raising for the ANC in 1992) read it in 2009 and suggested I clean it up and publish it.

Peace, Equality, Justice. These are noble ideals to strive for. But special interest groups have found ways to use them to their advantage. Agitate the poor in the ghettos in the name of Justice. Call riots and destruction the fight for Equality. And promise Peace if the ruling powers capitulate. It sounds like South Africa, but it is happening in the USA as well.

It is apparent to most there are divisions between Black and White in the USA. Not so apparent there is the "tribal" struggles between various groups - ethnic, religious and cultural.

It was after leaving Apartheid in South Africa and immigrating to America, then moving from the rural area into the heart of New York City, that the ethnic separation and cultural disparities became more evident to the Author. The high crime rate, drugs, and moral decay are increasing as the standards of the establishment are worn down by the special-interest groups

It used to be that Governments manipulated the media to influence the public, and to sway public opinion and attitudes. Now, the roles are reversed, and the media has become the force influencing both the public and the Government. Governments used to be somewhat conservative and influenced by business, whereas the media is staffed by, and financed by, people with a liberal outlook who are sympathetic to many of the special interest groups.

The ideals espoused by many of these groups appear reasonable enough, especially with their emphasis on Justice and Equality. But their ultimate aim is to further their agenda and to get special treatment in society. The result is division and confusion as to the direction society should take. The profit motive behind sensational stories further aggravates the situation.

As an outsider to American society who lived and worked with both liberals and conservatives, and traveled fairly extensively, the Author feels he was able to step back and see the trend. The future does not look pleasant. Ethnic strife is likely to increase as over-population and joblessness rise.