Radio signals have been "pulsed" since the days of Marconi. All that's changed is the power and the frequency at which they're modulated. The power has decreased and the frequency has increased. The frequency would have to increase dramatically (i.e., past the visible spectrum) before it would be able to cause any of the effects PartSkeptic wants to talk about.
Literally as inconsequential as whether the on-off switch on your modem is red or green. These just describe different ways of arranging the signal on the carriers to improve throughput or detect errors. If you didn't know which modulation method was being used, it would just look like the same squiggly pulses in each case. Not even an effect, much less a confounding effect.
The advocates, however, who PartSkeptic seems to believe are talented scientists, seem to regard these as embodying some sort of kiss-of-death tattoo in the radio band.
With regard to your previous post, I see nothing of help. You are trying hard to impress your fans. You are not helping the debate.
With regard to this post, it clearly shows that your understanding is superficial to say the least.
The first radio signals may have been "pulsed" (as in switched on and off) to transmit Morse code.
Once modulation of a carrier signal enabled better data transmission, the carrier was first amplitude modulated. It was not pulsed.
When frequency modulation came in, the noise was reduced, but the modulation was still sinusoidal and not pulsed. The output power was steady.
Then digital came in with computers and one and zero were transmitted. But the power was not pulsed because they used frequency shifting.
The digital age meant that the ones and zeros could be assembled into packets with check sums and header and footers. The analog voice was broken into digital steps with a number bits assigned to the various levels. So then voice was A to D - transmit - and D to A. Compression techniques were then needed for the lows and the highs. But still no pulsing.
The early cell signals were not pulsed. They were typical frequency modulated radio signals and were given a specific channel to operate on.
When cell sites became more sophisticated it was necessary that one antenna handle multiple calls. Hence time division multiplexing came in where one antenna hosted 8 calls at a time with the information compressed into each one-eighth slot. It is likely both cell phone and tower operated at full strength.
So only at this stage did pulsations now become part of the technology. The cell phone transmitted one eighth of the time. If the tower was at full capacity it did not pulse the power. It did pulse if 4 calls were active and 4 channels were idle.
When the tower was able to change the output power for each call (due to range) did one get cell tower power pulsations. Cell phones were able to switch power modes so that the transmit power could be less (say 0.2W instead of 2W). But still pulsed between 0.2W and zero rather than 2W and zero every one-eighth of a second.
Everything I have now written is from memory. I did not have to visit the internet.
I have worked on designing A to D and D to A. My university thesis was to design a digital low pass filter with DIP shift registers and it worked.
I know error detection and correcting. Packet switching with headers and footer for recombination at the other end. I know enough to understand the effect of emfs and how they look on an oscilloscope and spectrum analyzer. The information contained in the signal is irrelevant except for the possible standing wave recombination effects where signals add and subtract - but this is probably minor.
Your pronouncements that I do not understand the technology and you do is false. And I think you know it.
.
