LondonJohn
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- May 12, 2010
- Messages
- 21,458
I suspect that the posts of the past week or so - and especially over the past 24 hours - simply add more weight to the suppositions that a) no unconnected observer (eg all of us) can possibly truly know the real weight of evidence for (or against) this man being the abducter of Madeleine McCann, and b) the UK tabloid newspapers are very adapt at manipulating and sensationalising "information" about cases such as this, plus they have zero shame about performing spectacular reverse ferrets*
* For those unfamiliar with the term, a "reverse ferret" is a term coind within the UK tabloid newspaper industry (by then Sun editor Kelvin MacKenzie IIRC) to describe the process of a newspaper opinionating on a particular subject, but then - almost always in the light of new evidence which contradicts the newspaper's claims - 1) switching its opinion to the diametrical opposite of its original and 2) acting as if this new opposite opinion was always its opinion on the subject.
* For those unfamiliar with the term, a "reverse ferret" is a term coind within the UK tabloid newspaper industry (by then Sun editor Kelvin MacKenzie IIRC) to describe the process of a newspaper opinionating on a particular subject, but then - almost always in the light of new evidence which contradicts the newspaper's claims - 1) switching its opinion to the diametrical opposite of its original and 2) acting as if this new opposite opinion was always its opinion on the subject.