Pixel42
Schrödinger's cat
It's now five weeks since PartSkeptic agreed to do a simple blind test of his claim to be able to tell whether or not the wifi is switched on from his physical symptoms.
That is what is so irrational about all of this. Here I am awash in a sea of emf for decades. Yet I have have never experienced a headache. I peripherally know a little about them since my sister suffers migraines, but that is the extent of what I know about what headaches are like. just her descriptions.
That said, I have been on serious prescription painkillers in the past. Three times.
1. when I had all four wisdom teeth removed under general. I gave up on those because I wasn't really in any particular pain.
2. Post surgery after a bilateral inguinal hernia. I gave up on those because I was not in any particular pain.
3. When they reconstructed my shattered ankle with titanium plates and nuts and bolts. Gave up on those too. Wasn't feeling any particular pain.
Otherwise, in terms of pain, I have had biopsies for melanoma. Even under local that hurt like hell. Three deep biopsies on my leg requiring stitches/ After being held in recovery for about an hour I was given yet another prescription for military grade painkillers. I took none of them, I got up, walked out to the carpark, jumped in my car and drove home.
So am I some kind of hero? Don't make me laugh. I am no hero.
What I am saying is that subjective descriptions of experienced pain are rather oddly inconsistent.
Sorry to hear that. My father and grandfather both had it. I am hoping I didn't inherit their genes. Any time I forget how to spell a word or can't remember something it scares me.
They say that exercising your brain helps to slow the decline. So now is a good time to think more rationally!
More fail. Many smokers don't die of lung cancer because another known effect of smoking kills them first.
Smoking Fast Facts
Equating smoking with EMF is silly. One causes obvious harm through mechanisms that agree with science, the other does not. One has statistics backing this up, the other does not. Only ignorant lay people suffering from severe confirmation bias believe that low level EMF has any health effects, and they have no evidence to support their delusions.
BTW - The electrician and his helper went to the doctor and both were told to rest and stay home for five days because they were quite ill.
No correlation, huh?
It's now five weeks since PartSkeptic agreed to do a simple blind test of his claim to be able to tell whether or not the wifi is switched on from his physical symptoms.
When you put in enough IR to physically BOIL a cell, and lets generously assume that with 'double bonds' you mean the hydrogen bonding between bases, not the double bonds IN a nucleotide, as IR cannot damage those
If you put in enough energy, so can NIR
Factually wrong, even cancer caused by ionizing radiation has various mechanisms that can lead to the damage, of which the incorrect base pairing.
Wrong, as cells damaged by IR are cooked and thus dead and incapable of propagating
Correct, as see 4
Non sequitor
Yes, it's the logic you keep using, even though with every post you show to be oblivous to the fact that you lack the knowledge of both radiation and genetics to work things out.
Just because something can damage DNA does not mean it will cause cancer.
The energy needed to damage DNA by the radiation used in wifi and 5G is so high that the cells will be destroyed and non-functional long before the DNA is damaged.
This is also the case for said radiation and influencing other things in a cell.
As I've mentioned before, if your theories were right, we'd be using them in genetics as, if nothing else, they are way cheaper than using ionizing radiation to mutate DNA. But noone does. Because it does not work.
And I'm sure in your paranoid world that means that millions of people are being payed of by 'them' to keep silent.
If that's the case, can you direct me to the address I can use to get my money?

The pattern is clear: remaining quietly at home vs subjecting yourself to the stress and anxiety of going out, especially to somewhere you have convinced yourself is a toxic environment.I guess no one sees a correlation or a pattern.
You are still assuming that your hypothesis as to the cause of your headaches is correct. That is what this test is actually going to establish. You might be barking up the wrong tree entirely, and extending the period during which you are suffering unnecessarily. That's why you need to be prioritising doing the test rather than looking for excuses to put it off which, frankly, is what you seem to be doing.If I am getting headaches from going out among cell towers and to the tower house and those headaches are delayed until the pain tablets I take at 7 am wear off, how can I get a decent result?
Do you see why I persist here? I never imagined that I could get some of the arguments that I see on this thread. They are beyond rational and reasonable thought.
Just because:
James Clerk Maxwell was born on this day in 1831. He showed that electric and magnetic fields are aspects of a single phenomenon, determined the equations that govern it, and concluded that light and other forms of radiation are electromagnetic waves.
It is impossible to overestimate Maxwell's contribution to science.
Do you mean 'no causation'?
Quite ill with what? Growths on the forehead, or another symptom from your long list of claimed effects, or something else?
I thought it took months to become 'sensitised' to EMFs? How have your electrician and his helper been struck down so quickly?
Have you tried staying home and resting for 5 days yourself?
Uh.
Full body fybromyalgia?
You of course (I hope) realise that fybromyalgia headaches are a thing?
Any other ailments you'd like to list? This is the equivalent of taking a car to the mechanic and saying it's not running properly when the radio plays, while in actual fact there is no oil in the gearbox, the petrol filter has not been changed in years and a family of mice has set up camp in the carburettor.