Hi Roger.Good to see you again. Was it Bitcoin that we agreed on - and yet it keeps going?
Yep, propped up by a shared delusion of wealth from nothing. Half the price it was over 2 years ago, but still...
Can you explain why my blood pressure goes to nearly normal if I go the country side where the electrosmog is almost zero? It takes about 4 days.
Like I said, confirmation bias. There could be many reasons for the blood pressure variation, including the stress of worrying about your blood pressure!
The electrosmog acts as a catalyst to amplify any medical problem.
No, 'electrosmog' is not a catalyst of any medical problem. But your imagination might be.
Example 1. My knee replacement started failing with 2 days of high radiation in the old house lounge. It only started after I got out of bed to watch TV. When I realized the worker had not foil-lined the lounge ceiling I wrapped my leg in foil. The relief was almost immediate
What level is 'high' radiation, and how did you measure it?
Tinfoil around your leg could have other effects that are far more powerful than its ability to shield EMI (useless below 1MHz, not effective at GHz frequencies unless there are no gaps). For example it is a good reflector of IR, so could trap body heat. Muscles and joints often respond well to warmth.
Example 2. I started getting a burning sensation on my right upper thigh when visiting our old home next to the cell tower. It took about 45 minutes to manifest and about 4 hours to dissipate. This was quite repeatable. Then I started to get burning even when away from the tower. I did some research. It is a nerve that is not happy. It took about a week for me to realize that if I wore my normal size underwear the pain would happen. If I wore a larger size it would not happen. The elastic was pressing on the nerve. If I went to the house after a week of wearing the larger underwear I would not get the pain. Conclusion. The nerve was in the early stages of being stressed. The emf made it worse. When the nerve healed, the emf did not have an effect.
Confirmation bias again. The emf didn't make it worse, the condition was getting worse anyway.
The problem with an observation like this is that any unrelated thing that changes is not necessarily the cause. IOW correlation does not equal causation. In this case you
found the cause, and it was
not what you thought. So you should reject your first hypothesis and go with what you found
was the cause. Furthermore the actual cause was logical and reasonable, whereas the other one wasn't.
Lessons from God.
Believe it or not!
I feel your frustration, but as a technician with extensive experience in electronics I don't take any correlation as proof, particularly when there is no known mechanism for cause and effect. One thing I found out doing electronic fault diagnosis is that 99.9% of the time the cause is mundane - a dry joint, a broken track, a dried out capacitor - even when the fault is quite perplexing. So I start out with no preconceptions, but great skepticism - until I have proved the
real cause of the problem. It's embarrassing to charge a customer for 'fixing' a fault only to have it reappear because I didn't find the root cause.
I apply the same skepticism to my health. Just because a headache came on after x or a pain when in place y, doesn't mean x or y caused it. Only when the correlation is confirmed by multiple occurrences
and a likely cause is identified do I believe it.
Right now I am feeling pain in my right arm and wrist. This time I know what caused it - 3 weeks of repetitive strain potting 82,000 apple seeds. Next time, who knows? Any minor strain might set it off. But it won't be triggered by being close to a cellphone tower, because I know that the signal strength is miniscule and the effect practically unmeasurable. And since the only effect at cellphone frequencies is localized heating, it would more likely make it (insignificantly)
better than worse.