Merged rlopez2's thread to discuss recent history

What I find most impressive is that it went from Israel to the Jews in literally less than a sentence. That has to be some sort of record in outing yourself as an anti-semitic rube.

Who needs dog whistles when you have a bullhorn?
 
"Facebook the Jews" sounds cartoonishly evil, but the humor is lost in the OP's anti-Semitic tone.
 
> Something that I find worryingly silly about gringos is that they seem to take movies as some soft of self-help philosophy seriously ...
~
// __ Your Brain on Star Wars | Greg Crosby | TEDxMarylhurstU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_ksNFwHt9A
~
// __ A new way to monitor vital signs (that can see through walls) | Dina Katabi

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CXy1byguvJY
~
(00:13) When I was a kid, I was, like many of you in this room, very much fascinated by Star Wars ...
~
> If I didn't know people I would find strange and self-disrespecting that it is now the Israeli gov/Jews capitalizing on keeping thorough dossiers on every self-moving thing on earth:

https://www.timesofisrael.com/israe...eak-into-all-iphones-ever-made-some-androids/

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/06/21/facebook_privacy_israel/
~
> What the New York Times meant with those "regions" in their article about the USG assassination of Qassem Soleimani:

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/10/opinion/soleimani-iran-tom-cotton.html
~
> Henry Kissinger (Hillary Clinton's hero) who plotted the assassination of "terrorist" Bob Marley. He says that "we don't invade countries we 'freedom love' them"
~
Actually it was Zbigniew Brzezinski (whatever the difference between those two is anyway)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pax_Americana

5. "World powers without rivals are a class unto themselves. They ... are quick to call loyal followers friends, or amicus populi Romani. They no longer know any foes, just rebels, terrorists, and rogue states. They no longer fight, merely punish. They no longer wage wars but merely create peace. They are honestly outraged when vassals fail to act as vassals."[67] Zbigniew Brzezinski comments on the latter analogy: "One is tempted to add, they do not invade other countries, they only liberate."[68]

That like most gringo philosophical bs would be a good sentence to parse, but yes they are into a class of their own and they make sure they remain so, but not confronting any real power that would kick their rear end hard, so, are you going to start WWIII by considering yourself "without rival", "a class unto yourselves".
 
> "Facebook the Jews" sounds cartoonishly evil, but the humor is lost in the OP's anti-Semitic tone.
> Why is there so much racism in your posts, rlopez?
> What I find most impressive is that it went from Israel to the Jews in literally less than a sentence. That has to be some sort of record in outing yourself as an anti-semitic rube.

...

the sky is the limit for you guys! I hope CIA job hunters noticed your comment. You would be offered at least a fat 6 figure salary. They have been ever since looking for mind readers! You have such a powerful mind that you didn't allow yourself to be distracted by what freedom lovers are doing and saying, but noticed right away matters relating the sintagmatic distance of words in my language usage ad my "racism".

For the rest of you who don't have such powerful minds and would watch that documentary I warn you, the truth at times isn't "nice" like a happy-ending Hollywood movie, but then again not all movies must be like that. Let me just tell you that (my kind of) Jews here in NYC came out of the watch room fuming in anger and asking themselves very basic questions and I have all kinds of Jewish friends.

I think the people who made that movie were very "irresponsible" or as they are called in Israel they are "self-hating" Jews. They were not "critical thinking" whatsoever. Why/whom did they make that documentary for? All "We the people" want is some lulaby or see a US flag at the end to "not worry and be happy".

Keep reading my mind out of linguistic analysis and telling me whatever you want after watching that documentary.

> keept it short

most probably not what you'd wish, but I won't spoil it for you if whatever ideations make you happy.

> rammstein

Actually, the French exemplarily have not only been kracking crass jokes about NATO for a long time, but they have started to disarm

I would predict that more than 80% of German people would show the finger to freedom lovers. The gringo and British occupation troops seem to have forgotten to say Goodbye. Most people in Germany don't understand why they are still an occupied country, especially since it is them creating problems for them to deal with later.
 
I hope CIA job hunters noticed your comment. You would be offered at least a fat 6 figure salary.

It's amazing how many nutters over the years have told us all about these extraordinary sums of money we could be / should be / most definitely are earning from the CIA. But do I ever see a penny of it? Do I 'eck as like. I don't even get tax relief for time spent posting here. It's almost like it was something I do in my spare time instead of paid employment. Did I miss a memo or something?

Dave
 
> "Facebook the Jews" sounds cartoonishly evil, but the humor is lost in the OP's anti-Semitic tone.
> Why is there so much racism in your posts, rlopez?
> What I find most impressive is that it went from Israel to the Jews in literally less than a sentence. That has to be some sort of record in outing yourself as an anti-semitic rube.

...

the sky is the limit for you guys! I hope CIA job hunters noticed your comment. You would be offered at least a fat 6 figure salary. They have been ever since looking for mind readers! You have such a powerful mind that you didn't allow yourself to be distracted by what freedom lovers are doing and saying, but noticed right away matters relating the sintagmatic distance of words in my language usage ad my "racism".

For the rest of you who don't have such powerful minds and would watch that documentary I warn you, the truth at times isn't "nice" like a happy-ending Hollywood movie, but then again not all movies must be like that. Let me just tell you that (my kind of) Jews here in NYC came out of the watch room fuming in anger and asking themselves very basic questions and I have all kinds of Jewish friends.

I think the people who made that movie were very "irresponsible" or as they are called in Israel they are "self-hating" Jews. They were not "critical thinking" whatsoever. Why/whom did they make that documentary for? All "We the people" want is some lulaby or see a US flag at the end to "not worry and be happy".

Keep reading my mind out of linguistic analysis and telling me whatever you want after watching that documentary.

> keept it short

most probably not what you'd wish, but I won't spoil it for you if whatever ideations make you happy.

> rammstein Actually, the French exemplarily have not only been kracking crass jokes about NATO for a long time, but they have started to disarm
I would predict that more than 80% of German people would show the finger to freedom lovers. The gringo and British occupation troops seem to have forgotten to say Goodbye. Most people in Germany don't understand why they are still an occupied country, especially since it is them creating problems for them to deal with later.

Still the most powerful armed forces in Europe, all things considered.
And for the kracking crass jokes. Only for july 9th and 10th. And even these will be jokeless, I'm afraid.
 
Last edited:
Proving yet again that the posters with the most to say on a subject have the least knowledge of what they're discussing.

There is a universe inside every brain, but that universe isn't necessarily reality based.
 
> Why is there so much racism in your posts, rlopez?

Sorry, I took your comment as one of those "classifying" "mind reading" conclusions so common here, not as an actual question.

Great Lord! All that "hate speech" from mine, right? Personally, I don't give a diarrheic ***** about people's races, ethnicities, sexuality (which, as of late, people have been indoctrinated into seeing it as a "policitical"/"identity" matter, "what you do with your ass is what you should see as 'political', the subject of 'moral sophistication' nonsense, ... leave the rest of all that business to us")

Perhaps you see so much "racism" in my comments because there is so much "love" in all that "freedom loving" while 8xing the genocidal ratio of Nazi Germany during WWII, using children in nearby schools for target practice, signature striking little children and their grandmas for "threatening" all that "worldsonlysuperpowerness" of yours?

... but then when your bluff is called by a matching power you become all "verbal", "rule of law", "responsible", about "critical thinking"?

Also, I call you gringos because I wouldn't know what to call you. I think I explained that in one of my posts, basically gringos don't even notice how they are making fun of themselves with the Monroe Doctrine (which they wholeheartedly see as one of those altruistic, "good Christian" things of theirs), by calling hopelessly morally debasing ***** "un-Amerikan", ... so, in the Star Wars ways in which they think, apparently see reality, they are tacitly defining themselves as the very definition of all that is right and just in the Universe ...

To me the term "gringo" is kind of neutral (as in a "regular gringa") and kind of gringo auch in this sense:

// __ Madeleine Albright - 60 Minutes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbIX1CP9qr4
~
it doesn't necessarily mean U.S. citizen:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gringo
~
> Listen to your doctor and take your meds.

thank you for keeping it real for me. I had started to wonder what is wrong with you guys, if you were OK. How come you hadn't yet told me yet that I was mentally ill?

I have always belived that ideologies are bs, some kind of mental entertainment for those of us who have nothing better to do with our minds. It is amazing to notice, among many other things, how much current day USA resembles the times of Stalin era soviets. In those times it was the government who deemed you "mentally ill" when you criticized them. In current day USA it is "We the people" who "critically", even "skeptically", and "respoonsibly" as in ("Social Responsibility Committees") would not even let the government do "their work":

https://theintercept.com/2016/04/09...o-identify-radicalized-muslims-raises-alarms/

https://theintercept.com/2016/04/28...for-secretive-anti-radicalization-committees/

https://canarymission.org/

I am not so sure about that difference, especially its implications relating to "We the people" (even those who consider themselves to be "skeptical"), being something good or bad.

Who would have thought that the perp ratio (percentage of police, infraguards, perpetrators, snitches, ...) in current day USA is at least 4 times higher than in East Germany and in East Germany it was higher than during Nazism!?! Wouldn't that be "un-Amerikan"? Oh, no wait!, of course, "it is different when -we- do it" (tm), because we do it for "the greater good" (tm).

You would wonder what could be more "greater goodie" (tm), "good Christianny", "Star War" like, ... than freedom loving Russia and China for knowing hell well that "they shouldn't be doing what they do ..." (tm), especially after "winning the cold war, just by having that clownish, greatest US president ever Reagan stand tall to them" (tm), but then USG becomes all "responsible" ...

> Yep rated seventh overall in the world and just ahead of the UK.
> https://www.globalfirepower.com/countries-listing.asp

Well, yes this is part of my whole point! Go, "freedom lovers" go! Why is it that you can't only use all that "worldsonlysuperpowerness" to genocidally abuse people?
 
Why is there so much racism in your posts, rlopez?

> Why is there so much racism in your posts, rlopez?

Sorry, I took your comment as one of those "classifying" "mind reading" conclusions so common here, not as an actual question.

Great Lord! All that "hate speech" from mine, right? Personally, I don't give a diarrheic ***** about people's races, ethnicities, sexuality (which, as of late, people have been indoctrinated into seeing it as a "policitical"/"identity" matter, "what you do with your ass is what you should see as 'political', the subject of 'moral sophistication' nonsense, ... leave the rest of all that business to us")

Then why mention it? Has anyone else made a point of referring to you by your ethnicity?

Also, I call you gringos because I wouldn't know what to call you.

Why do you have to call us anything? If you must, then what's wrong with calling us 'people' or 'fellow forum members'?

I think I explained that in one of my posts, basically gringos don't even notice how they are making fun of themselves with the Monroe Doctrine (which they wholeheartedly see as one of those altruistic, "good Christian" things of theirs), by calling hopelessly morally debasing ***** "un-Amerikan", ... so, in the Star Wars ways in which they think, apparently see reality, they are tacitly defining themselves as the very definition of all that is right and just in the Universe ...

To me the term "gringo" is kind of neutral (as in a "regular gringa") and kind of gringo auch in this sense:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gringo

wikipedia said:
In English it often carries a derogatory connotation, and occasionally does so in Spanish and Portuguese.

From the very first paragraph of your link. :rolleyes:

I have always belived that ideologies are bs, some kind of mental entertainment for those of us who have nothing better to do with our minds. It is amazing to notice, among many other things, how much current day USA resembles the times of Stalin era soviets. In those times it was the government who deemed you "mentally ill" when you criticized them. In current day USA it is "We the people" who "critically", even "skeptically", and "respoonsibly" as in ("Social Responsibility Committees") would not even let the government do "their work":

Absolute rubbish. You clearly know nothing about Stalinist Russia.
The links you posted here make no mention at all of being deemed mentally ill if you criticise the US government.



The one below is about monitoring anti-semitism. Strange, as you were at such pains to protest that you are not an anti-semite, that you would see this site as somehow bad.

I have snipped the rest of your rambling gibberish. It really is beneath me to comment on it.
 
I have always belived that ideologies are bs, some kind of mental entertainment for those of us who have nothing better to do with our minds. It is amazing to notice, among many other things, how much current day USA resembles the times of Stalin era soviets. In those times it was the government who deemed you "mentally ill" when you criticized them. In current day USA it is "We the people" who "critically", even "skeptically", and "respoonsibly" as in ("Social Responsibility Committees") would not even let the government do "their work":

Parklife.
 
basically gringos don't even notice how they are making fun of themselves with the Monroe Doctrine (which they wholeheartedly see as one of those altruistic, "good Christian" things of theirs), by calling hopelessly morally debasing ***** "un-Amerikan", ... so, in the Star Wars ways in which they think, apparently see reality, they are tacitly defining themselves as the very definition of all that is right and just in the Universe ...

You're stereotyping an entire racial/ethnic group. That's racism. You do it in pretty much ever ypost. Why is there so much racism in your posts, rlopez?
 
Snipped .

Also, I call you gringos because I wouldn't know what to call you.

Snipped.

There is no requirement for you to address other forum members as a group.

If you feel the need to address a forum member at all you can use their handle.

Addressing individual persons as group members ("You people" being the example that comes to mind) instead of addressing tham as an individual is universally accepted as being symptomatic of a bias against the group cited.
 
giphy.gif


giphy.gif
 

Back
Top Bottom