Biden for President?

Status
Not open for further replies.
That they were stupid and redundant seems to have been the point.

Uh...no. Try reading his post again. That is not what he was saying at all.

Yeah, he over extended that term and you swooped in to score the point while ignoring the message. :thumbsup:

Not unless "over extending" means completely misusing.
 
Last edited:
Gonna need some evidence for that whopper.

Weinstein and Cosby got caught because they were prolific and notorious repeat offenders. They are on the extreme end. There's no reason why less wanton creeps couldn't escape a similar fate.

Because Biden hasn't been buried under double digit accusers, he must be innocent? That's insane.

This's been replied to already, but I wanted to emphasize something specific----Weinstein and Cosby got caught after being prolific and notorious repeat offenders only after decades of zero consequences. Year after year of never being called to account, always having access to new women.

Also, if one person's claim against another years later is enough to discredit them in your eyes, then why hasn't Hunt's documented claim discredited Reade in your eyes as Reade's undocumented and shifting one has for Biden?
 
So over extend it is. : thumbsup :

I'll admit to extension, but not over-extension.

I think it's reasonable to extend the term "doxxing" to cover not only the initial step of internet haters tracking down the person's identity, but also -
- tracking down of other information, (or "information") about the subject
- using of that information to harass and humiliate the subject

Internet "sleuths" going on a hunt for details of Reade's personal history, in order to build a dossier for the purpose of damaging her reputation and challenging her credibility, totally counts as doxxing in my book.

Appealing to urbandictionary.com as an authority that what's being done isn't "technically" doxxing, doesn't make it any less repugnant, or any less in the same spirit.
 
I'll admit to extension, but not over-extension.

I think it's reasonable to extend the term "doxxing" to cover not only the initial step of internet haters tracking down the person's identity, but also -
- tracking down of other information, (or "information") about the subject
- using of that information to harass and humiliate the subject

Internet "sleuths" going on a hunt for details of Reade's personal history, in order to build a dossier for the purpose of damaging her reputation and challenging her credibility, totally counts as doxxing in my book.

Appealing to urbandictionary.com as an authority that what's being done isn't "technically" doxxing, doesn't make it any less repugnant, or any less in the same spirit.

Yes, your point was clear. Someone zeroed in on a pedantic point scoring opportunity and ignored the message.
 
Yeah, he over extended that term and you swooped in to score the point while ignoring the message. :thumbsup:
Talk about trying to score points. Calling an investigation of the woman's credibility "doxxing" was about trying to score points.

His message was nothing new or astounding. It was the same old **** being posted over and over here, how dare we look at Reade's this or that.

Fine. What are we supposedly allowed to look at?

Here, let me get you started:
There is a suspiciously linked reason why she was fired. That is not about 'doxxing' her financial troubles.
 
Last edited:
Talk about trying to score points. Calling an investigation of the woman's credibility "doxxing" was about trying to score points.

His message was nothing new or astounding. It was the same old **** being posted over and over here, how dare we look at Reade's this or that.

Fine. What are we supposedly allowed to look at?

Here, let me get you started:
There is a suspiciously linked reason why she was fired. That is not about 'doxxing' her financial troubles.

The keyboard Columbo stuff is ludicrous and redundant.
 
....

Appealing to urbandictionary.com as an authority that what's being done isn't "technically" doxxing, doesn't make it any less repugnant, or any less in the same spirit.
You got another source that supports your misuse of the term, 'doxxing'?

Edited to add: Stacy beat me to it.
 
Last edited:
I know the Trumpanzees want Tara Reede to be a big story. However, the main stream media vetted it and found nothing and it's a non-story.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom