Shalamar
Dark Lord of the JREF
I find it heart-warming that conservatives won't be supporting 'rapey' candidates.
That leaves out Biden, and Trump. So who will they vote for?
That leaves out Biden, and Trump. So who will they vote for?
About the drinking draino? He asked a dumb question, it seems weird that he appears to do this kind of thing off the cuff, buy he is what he is. The press was then so concerned that he suggested scientists might want to look into the use of some kind of germ killing chemical inside the body, that they told everybody he had recommended drinking it. They then made up a story implying people were drinking it because of what they said he'd said. He then pretended he'd been being sarcastic. At that point everybody got cross that he wasn't taking responsibility for the deaths and injuries that hadn't happened from him advising people to ingest bleach, which he hadn't done.What do you guys think the President said?
As a follow up, do you buy his day later claim of sarcasm?
I find it heart-warming that conservatives won't be supporting 'rapey' candidates.
That leaves out Biden, and Trump. So who will they vote for?
About the drinking draino? He asked a dumb question, it seems weird that he appears to do this kind of thing off the cuff, buy he is what he is. The press was then so concerned that he suggested scientists might want to look into the use of some kind of germ killing chemical inside the body, that they told everybody he had recommended drinking it. They then made up a story implying people were drinking it because of what they said he'd said. He then pretended he'd been being sarcastic. At that point everybody got cross that he wasn't taking responsibility for the deaths and injuries that hadn't happened from him advising people to ingest bleach, which he hadn't done.
It's a mess. If the media had just stuck to the facts they'd have come off looking good and he'd have come off looking a bit foolish. Instead they decided to jump into the mud, again... like they always do.
That might be my take if this had been a "man on the street" statement by a nobody.About the drinking draino? He asked a dumb question, it seems weird that he appears to do this kind of thing off the cuff, buy he is what he is. The press was then so concerned that he suggested scientists might want to look into the use of some kind of germ killing chemical inside the body, that they told everybody he had recommended drinking it. They then made up a story implying people were drinking it because of what they said he'd said. He then pretended he'd been being sarcastic. At that point everybody got cross that he wasn't taking responsibility for the deaths and injuries that hadn't happened from him advising people to ingest bleach, which he hadn't done.
It's a mess. If the media had just stuck to the facts they'd have come off looking good and he'd have come off looking a bit foolish. Instead they decided to jump into the mud, again... like they always do.
It's not about supporting "rapey" candidates. It's about leading a mob chanting "believe all women" that got people fired on the strength of an allegation, and then backing a "rapey" candidate. Was it all pretend? The outrage? The moral posturing?I find it heart-warming that conservatives won't be supporting 'rapey' candidates.
That leaves out Biden, and Trump. So who will they vote for?
[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/picture.php?albumid=104&pictureid=12460[/qimg]
It's not about supporting "rapey" candidates. It's about leading a mob chanting "believe all women" that got people fired on the strength of an allegation, and then backing a "rapey" candidate. Was it all pretend? The outrage? The moral posturing?
It's not about supporting "rapey" candidates. It's about leading a mob chanting "believe all women" that got people fired on the strength of an allegation, and then backing a "rapey" candidate. Was it all pretend? The outrage? The moral posturing?
[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/picture.php?albumid=104&pictureid=12460[/qimg]
That might be my take if this had been a "man on the street" statement by a nobody.
It was a statement by the highest elected public official in the country during a pandemic.
Also, do you dispute records of increased call volumes to poison control hotlines over the weekend and/or care to put forward a convoluted explanation for them?
Show me the data the story you are referring to is quoting? Everything I've seen is comparing this year to last year. This year there is already a spike going back to January in such things due to everybody disinfecting things because of the virus. Over that period there has been a 20% spike since last year. The only evidence I can see is them saying that the 18 hours after Trump made his statement was more than double the same period last year. Is that more than the 18 hours before he said it, for some reason they don't mention that.That might be my take if this had been a "man on the street" statement by a nobody.
It was a statement by the highest elected public official in the country during a pandemic.
Also, do you dispute records of increased call volumes to poison control hotlines over the weekend and/or care to put forward a convoluted explanation for them?
No he didn't. You are lying again. He suggested his people look into it. It is the media and Democrats who are going around telling people that Trump has told them to inject it/drink it. Fortunately nobody seems to have been fooled into doing it.I just came across a Patton Oswald tweet that perfectly sums up the stance by shuttit, sir drinks-a-lot, and theprestige: "The President didn't tell people to DRINK bleach. He suggested injecting it into their veins or lungs. With the help of a DOCTOR." -- folds arms, satisfied smile, another libtard owned
It's not about supporting "rapey" candidates. It's about leading a mob chanting "believe all women" that got people fired on the strength of an allegation, and then backing a "rapey" candidate. Was it all pretend? The outrage? The moral posturing?
People like you are so destructive to the Democrat cause. I appreciate you are probably trolling, but there are a lot of you about.Yes, I think your confusion is pretend. There was no one leading a chanting mob, there was no chant or admonition to "believe all women", I have no idea what people you are claiming were fired over allegations, and Reade's various/contradictory allegations were made after people backed Biden, not the other way around.
OH NO!!! Just look at applecrapped's undeniable evidence!!! I shall withdraw my vote after seeing these photos!!!
Not. The photos are interesting to me because I have several photos of myself, from childhood on. In them, there are pictures of older men showing me attention. They were usually friends of my parents or distant, older relatives.
One photo is of me with Jimmy Durant, a friend of my dad. He's waiting for me to give him a kiss on the cheek. Another of a man at a big family get together, who stood behind my back while I was sitting, and was playing with my long hair.
I did not feel uncomfortable, there was never a time. Though I may look uncomfortable in many photos, the cause was how extremely shy and introverted my nature was.
Just a few examples of . Only in minds like yours, is there anything sexual or inappropriately intimate about the photos you 'shared'.
Be terrible to make a good man who is just being friendly feel uncomfortable if you made a scene because of your hang ups.
Why can't these eight women, who say Joe Biden made them feel uncomfortable with his inappropriate touching, just get over their hang ups. Bunch of prudes if you ask me. Gawd.