I'm pretty sure I can look at screenshots from movies until I'm blue in the face without ever seeing them as evidence of anything other than that movie makers (of varying degrees of talent) make movies.Again, if the evidence doesn't tell you the truth then you need to keep looking at it till it does.
That's why the Surviving 2023 video exists - to build up the corpus and demonstrate design over coincidence.I'm pretty sure I can look at screenshots from movies until I'm blue in the face without ever seeing them as evidence of anything other than that movie makers (of varying degrees of talent) make movies.
The movies they make are clearly influenced by the times they live in and the current tastes of their audience, but then what else would you expect?
Let's try this: give me a description of the kind of screenshot you would expect to see instead if your, um, imaginative hypothesis was false.
I came late to the thread but I've read it all, and all I've seen is cherry picked screenshots intended to support your bizarre hypothesis (though rarely succeeding in doing so).That's why the Surviving 2023 video exists - to build up the corpus and demonstrate design over coincidence.
You see, you've also missed other things that we've already discussed in the topic already: two or more pieces of evidence from the same corpus is better than one, as shown by the 2 poster examples: tube station + BBC/North Korea.
OK, let's discuss it over a few concepts.Do the people who get rich by making movies try to make movies that will get big audiences to make them richer, or do they make movies to send secret clues that they intend to murder all the people who pay to see their movies? If it's the latter, are they stupid? I recognise that being stupid is not a bar to becoming powerful, but I just want to understand this paranoid fantasy world a little better. Do they realise that when they have murdered all of their customers the money will stop coming in?
It looks like cherry picked coincidences because the evidence, being in plain sight, is so easy to come by. And because such a psychopathic conspiracy is too monstrous to imagine you automatically assumed it was cherry picked rather than being readily available by design.I came late to the thread but I've read it all, and all I've seen is cherry picked screenshots intended to support your bizarre hypothesis (though rarely succeeding in doing so).
That is not how you support an hypothesis - at least it's not how someone who has the tiniest hint of a clue what they're doing supports an hypothesis. You don't just look for data to confirm it, you look equally hard for data to disprove it. You use your hypothesis to make predictions of both what will and will not happen under carefully specified conditions, and then look to see if you're right.
So I ask again: what kind of screenshots would you expect never to see if your hypothesis is false? Then you (and we) can look for them. If anyone finds one, that is evidence against your hypothesis.
You can also use your hypothesis to predict what screenshots you expect to see in as yet unreleased films, if you like, and we can look for those too.
See how it works? It's not rocket science.
I notice you didn't answer my question, so you obviously still don't understand why no amount of screenshots that can be interpreted in a way that fits your hypothesis are meaningful evidence in support of it.It looks like cherry picked coincidences because the evidence, being in plain sight, is so easy to come by. And because such a psychopathic conspiracy is too monstrous to imagine you automatically assumed it was cherry picked rather than being readily available by design.
As I've already mentioned: it's difficult to find a movie these days that doesn't feature 2023 propaganda - actually comprises 37+ themes as covered by the Surviving 2023 video; "23" and global flood propaganda isn't the only thing being "cherry picked" here - but the numerology/dating behind this project is your first lesson to begin understanding it.
My local golf course has 3 cherry trees + 1 wild cherry tree in one area, and they are not there by coincidence.
We have already discussed several screenshots in the topic and how to begin joining the dots through a propaganda lens. For example when a guy collapses from the virus, the breaking and spilling over of an aquarium is also emphasized. But you have yet to read the topic properly and watch the opening video that takes us through the evidence and sets the foundation for this topic in the first place.I notice you didn't answer my question, so you obviously still don't understand why no amount of screenshots that can be interpreted in a way that fits your hypothesis are meaningful evidence in support of it.
I can only suggest you reread my posts (or a good primer on the scientific method) until you do understand.
"Joining the dots", in this case, is akin to pareidolia.We have already discussed several screenshots in the topic and how to begin joining the dots through a propaganda lens. For example when a guy collapses from the virus, the breaking and spilling over of an aquarium is also emphasized. But you have yet to read the topic properly and watch the opening video that takes us through the evidence and sets the foundation for this topic in the first place.
OK, let's discuss it over a few concepts.
<crazy garbage snipped for brevity>.
Sorry to quote myself but I said "akin to pareidolia" because I couldn't remember the more general, and appropriate, term which I have now looked up:"Joining the dots", in this case, is akin to pareidolia.
If you watch the video then you will learn that the additional water will be coming from the dome/firmament after being opened up temporarily - and that tons of propaganda exists for this also - as part of the 23 project. That's why the earth is viewed as an aquarium; a Tesla coil in terms of the weather machine (or "engine"); and we are the crown's virus that must be reduced to keep population levels in perpetual balance.Just out of curiosity, where does all the extra water come from? We have a reasonable idea how high the sea levels would get if all the ice on earth melts, and you put it at 2-3 times higher than that.
Or is that also found in movies?
Science and other capitalist controlled academia are on trial here, hence we are appealing to empirical evidence for the truth, which is nothing like random noise on this occasion - but very sophisticated man-made propaganda."Joining the dots", in this case, is akin to pareidolia.
The human tendency to find a signal in the noise, even when there is only noise, is the reason the scientific method had to be invented.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cognitive_biases
It looks like cherry picked coincidences because the evidence, being in plain sight, is so easy to come by. And because such a psychopathic conspiracy is too monstrous to imagine you automatically assumed it was cherry picked rather than being readily available by design.
As I've already mentioned: it's difficult to find a movie these days that doesn't feature 2023 propaganda - actually comprises 37+ themes as covered by the Surviving 2023 video; "23" and global flood propaganda isn't the only thing being "cherry picked" here - but the numerology/dating behind this project is your first lesson to begin understanding it.
My local golf course has 3 cherry trees + 1 wild cherry tree in one area, and they are not there by coincidence.
Your description is about right - Illuminati being a convenient umbrella term to describe the secret societies comprising Freemasons and others. Alex Jones has spent 20 years making a case for the FEMA camps - but he missed out some crucial points - namely the 2023 ebola+global flood catalyst for Martial Law. He also missed out the identity of the elite even though they reveal themselves in nearly every Hollywood blockbuster. Without knowing the bigger picture (or trees amongst the forest) any knowledge of just FEMA camps alone does little to protect us from the project at large. 2023 is the sequel to 911 - and in some respects the sequel to world war II - since it goes back to those times prior to NASA's foundation. And without taking the next logical step after learning about 911 or the globe earth deception then we are almost certainly doomed. People keep asking who is behind 911 and I keep telling them: if you are a good enough detective then you will look at the YouTube video called September 10th 2001 (the day before) to find out the answer or check what they found perfectly preserved in the ashes besides a passport.Okay, that's all bonkers but also oddly familiar: The Freemasons are giggling behind our backs while preparing to murder us all. Yeah, I've heard it before, except it was the Illuminati that time and they were going to turn all the shopping malls into death camps. They had been waiting for centuries for an auspicious moment but I guess the Freemasons have been around for centuries too. Imagine all those generations of Masons, wasting their whole lives hoping this will be the year they get to murder all the non-Freemasons and live like princes. Sad.
The only interesting question is, in 2023 when all this nonsense doesn't happen, will you come back and admit it was nonsense or will you come back with a reset and tell us all about your portents for 2026?
The only way to tell if it's "sophisticated man-made propaganda" or random noise is to use the scientific method. Anyone can understand the necessity for it and use it to collect empirical evidence, you don't have to be a member of the "capitalist controlled academia" to do so. Fail to do so and you can easily fool yourself into all sorts of false beliefs.Science and other capitalist controlled academia are on trial here, hence we are appealing to empirical evidence for the truth, which is nothing like random noise on this occasion - but very sophisticated man-made propaganda.