Regarding that one piece of evidence and our continued circular conversations, here's my previous quotes:
Also, the elite cannot tell you their entire plan through a single poster in a tube station, so that's why it's important to build up that framework and learn the bigger picture - trees amongst the forest - that will enable one to solve the propaganda puzzles behind the elite's 50+ year project.
Why would the elites bother with such an elaborate and pointless puzzle?
If they wanted us to know the plan they'd just tell us. If they didn't want us to know the plan, they'd just not tell us.
Since it sounds like the kind of plan they wouldn't want us to know about, we're in this middle ground where they're not telling us the plan but you're seeing the plan anyway. The simplest explanation for this is that there is no plan, and that you are seeing something that isn't there.
This explanation has merit beyond simplicity. We know that there are failure modes of human perception that create the impression of information where there is none. Some of these failure modes, like pareidolia and confirmation bias, are common to pretty much all humans. We all tend to see patterns that aren't there (pareidolia), and patterns of hits because we instinctively ignore misses (confirmation bias).
Other failure modes are less common, but still very much possible. I don't know the medical term for "excessive fantasism", but I bet there is one. Perhaps one of the other members will help me out.
Then there's failures like schizophrenia and paranoia. Both of these produce impressions of information where no information exists. These impressions can be very strong, even seemingly incontrovertible.
If the only evidence for your elites is also evidence that can be produced by the above failures of human perception, then the simplest explanation is that this is a failure of perception on your part, rather than actual evidence that the elites exist.
My position is that if the elites did exist as you describe them, there would be plenty of clear evidence for them. If there were a weather machine, we'd know there was a weather machine. We wouldn't have to infer it. The people who worked on it would talk. The people who lived near the facility would talk. Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk and Richard Branson would talk.
I predict that your conspiracy theory has not yet accounted for the problem that Elon Musk would find out about this and talk about it. You'll now have to ad-hoc account for him keeping quiet. Maybe they got to him somehow? And then you'll have to explain how they keep getting to millions of smart and ambitious people all around the world, year over year. The scientists and engineers they'd need to build and operate their diabolical machinery. The ambitious entrepreneurs who would be in a position to notice that the world isn't as they expected, and under no obligation to conform to the program.
Ultimately, we'd find that the number of people necessary to keep this plan going and to keep it secret is: Pretty Much Everyone in the World Except Gilius.
And at that point, the better explanation is simply that Gilius is wrong.
