Ed Corona Virus Conspiracy Theories....

Status
Not open for further replies.
A few years ago I went back to college. One of the things we learned in Environmental Science was we could expect more pandemics as animal viruses make the jump to humans. Predicting a pandemic is like predicting earthquakes in California, Japan, or Indonesia. There's a 50/50 chance of being right any day of the week.

If it was true, the governements all over the world would be ready. But they are not !? So it must be an act of GOD ! :boxedin:
 
When I checked Worldometer earlier today the number of new deaths in the USA ended in 666! Coincidence? What do YOU think, Sheeple!
Oh, and don't forget the epicenter is (((NYC)))!
 
A Harvard study links air pollution to bad covid-19 outcomes.

Guess what is also likely to coexist with air pollution?

Cell phone microwave electrosmog. Some defenders of Telcos will say that there are studies linking air pollution to illness, and I will say that there are studies linking electrosmog to illness - choose who you decide to believe. It is like the early days of the climate change debate.

https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/h...tion-linked-with-higher-covid-19-death-rates/

People with COVID-19 who live in U.S. regions with high levels of air pollution are more likely to die from the disease than people who live in less polluted areas, according to a new nationwide study from Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.
 
Well let's see.

Air pollution damages lungs, and Covid-19 affects lungs, so people whose lungs are already damaged by air pollution will be more likely to die from Covid-19.

vs

Cell phone electromagnetic radiation has no effect whatsoever on lungs, and Covid-19 affects lungs, so people whose lungs are not damaged by cell phone electromagnetic radiation will be more likely to die from Covid-19.

It's a tough one.
 
Last edited:
Give it time. Predictions are not precise. Is it not enough to know that:

1) God is allowing this to happen so as to stop the destruction of the planet.

2) That the world will become more spiritual

3) That one pandemic is not enough, and there will be more, together with massive collateral damage

4) The start is upon us and despite some respites now and then, it will continue to wreak havoc.

5) Science will finally be forced to recognize the damage electro-smog does.

You do know I am not trying to convince anyone on this forum. I post here to get feedback. It is part of the way God works. The messages are subtle and must be filtered out of the background noise.

I get no pleasure as a doom-sayer. The opposite. Life for me and others is most unpleasant. Our hope it that a better world emerges.

Just for the sake of clarity:
Do you support or oppose attempts to fight the coronavirus?
 
ANyone know why Bill Gates is suddenly the boogey man for all things vaccine and NWO and pops up in Corona virus and 5G kook threads?
 
ANyone know why Bill Gates is suddenly the boogey man for all things vaccine and NWO and pops up in Corona virus and 5G kook threads?

Why not ? He's rich, well known, frequent in media, promotes scientific approach. Also he's smart. You can't really suspect Trump is head of secret order. But what about Bill Gates ?
 
More specifically his foundation has been a major funder of development of vaccines for the world's biggest killer diseases, so naturally he's the devil incarnate to the wilfully ignorant.
 
:rolleyes: This is standard practice for majority or rich and well known people.

First they accrue riches on back of people and decades of abuse of various kind (in case of Microsoft things like monopolistic practices and making terrible, unsafe crap ridden with holes that everyone uses anyway).

Then when they are getting old, very rich and start worrying about image of them left to next generation, they setup some charities for PR purposes. Do they really think it will make up for decades of corporate cronyism? I guess it works, judging by uncritical reception here.

This is what robber barons of old did and this is what current bunch of moguls do. And everyone laps it up.

What a joke.

Only exception known to me is Elon Musk. He will not need to setup any charities to buttress his conscience.
 
:rolleyes: This is standard practice for majority or rich and well known people.

First they accrue riches on back of people and decades of abuse of various kind (in case of Microsoft things like monopolistic practices and making terrible, unsafe crap ridden with holes that everyone uses anyway).

Then when they are getting old, very rich and start worrying about image of them left to next generation, they setup some charities for PR purposes. Do they really think it will make up for decades of corporate cronyism? I guess it works, judging by uncritical reception here.

This is what robber barons of old did and this is what current bunch of moguls do. And everyone laps it up.

What a joke.

Only exception known to me is Elon Musk. He will not need to setup any charities to buttress his conscience.

Alfred Nobel showed the way :)

As for the 5G nonsense, if that were true it would open up SO much in the fields of medicine and biochemistry. I mean it would make Pasteur's contribution seem like nothing. We'd be able to fight and destroy any infection and any tumor with impunity.

Care to explain why we don't?
 
Just for the sake of clarity:
Do you support or oppose attempts to fight the coronavirus?

I support the attempts to fight the virus. Survival of the fittest and the smartest.

Strangely the death rate in times of recession drops. This has been attributed to many factors. One is that there are less people on the road. Another is that people are less stressed without a job - the pressures of work are quite bad.

This means that the death rate must climb drastically to reduce the population.

Science has predicted that our current population is unsustainable. Okay. Apart from more waves of viral infection, what else is going to limit the population?
 
Science has predicted that our current population is unsustainable. Okay. Apart from more waves of viral infection, what else is going to limit the population?
Birth control, driven by the education of women. The fertility rate has already dropped in developed countries (in many cases to below the replacement rate), and increasing education and empowerment of women in the rest will soon do the same there.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Projections_of_population_growth#Fertility

From 2015 to 2020, the average world fertility rate was 2.5 children per woman,[5] about half the level in 1950–1955 (5 children per woman). In the medium variant, global fertility is projected to decline further to 2.2 in 2045 to 2050 and to 1.9 in 2095–2100.[5]

The consequences are inevitable:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Projections_of_population_growth

The 2019 forecast from the United Nation’s Population Division shows that world population growth peaked at 2.1% per year in 1962, has since dropped to 1.0%, and could drop even further to 0.1% by 2100, a growth rate not seen since pre-industrial revolution days.[1]

Based on this, the UN Population Division expects world population, currently (2020) at 7.8 billion, to level out at or soon after the end of the 21st Century at 10.9 billion (the median line).[2]

The current pandemic will hardly make a dent in these figures. Climate change might make a bigger one, though.
 
A Harvard study links air pollution to bad covid-19 outcomes.

Guess what is also likely to coexist with air pollution?

Cell phone microwave electrosmog. Some defenders of Telcos will say that there are studies linking air pollution to illness, and I will say that there are studies linking electrosmog to illness - choose who you decide to believe. It is like the early days of the climate change debate.

https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/h...tion-linked-with-higher-covid-19-death-rates/

People with COVID-19 who live in U.S. regions with high levels of air pollution are more likely to die from the disease than people who live in less polluted areas, according to a new nationwide study from Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.
You're using a study that links higher mortality from COVID--19 with air pollution, in order to make a case that higher mortality from COVID-19 isn't caused by air pollution? Wat?

That's certainly an interesting take on scientific reasoning... :confused:
 
This pandemic really has forced a lot of people to demonstrate that they're not 'lovable conspiracy idiots', but genuinely dangerous ********.
 
I support the attempts to fight the virus. Survival of the fittest and the smartest. ...
On noes, only you and trump will be left...

... Strangely the death rate in times of recession drops. This has been attributed to many factors. One is that there are less people on the road. Another is that people are less stressed without a job - the pressures of work are quite bad. ...
Too bad this is not a standard regression, it is a Pandemic. Less stress? lol, Pandemic.

Yes, the Motor-Vehicle deaths go down, that is true. Darn, suicides don't slow down, darn you almost had something. Heart deaths fall, but wait till we get out of the house, then the attack is back. COVID will take up the slack, and kill more than motor-vehicles. With 1,000 deaths a day, the virus is taking up the slack, and this is a pandemic, not a recession. Thus, death by virus continues, suicides don't usually go down : Say Pandemic - or if you wish, a Pandemic recession.

... This means that the death rate must climb drastically to reduce the population. ...
Drive faster? What?

... Science has predicted that our current population is unsustainable. Okay. Apart from more waves of viral infection, what else is going to limit the population?
People who are crazy, like the Hale Bopp Comet cult?
 
Exactly what I thought. Except the bats they study are in a different province of China--to the South --hours away. They take samples and bring them back. I thought it was just the blood/dna but perhaps the live specimens as well. The market though was only ~350 meters away from the Wuhan lab.

There is more but I'll wait for more info. Patient zero may have been a researcher there. Or the bats may have been sold after studies were done. It is just so coincidental for a country so large to have happened in the same place.

After they took all the samples they wanted, a janitor sold the diseased/euthanised bats at the market?
 
The prediction that the world will become more spiritual, whatever the hell that means, as a result of Covid-19 is an interesting one. A more scientifically literate, and prepared to listen to scientific advice, population is surely at least as likely. If only because the anti-vax, anti-science "spiritual" bunch are more likely to ignore that advice and end up dead.

Not to mention how viruses spread like wildfire through woo congregations (of all flavours of woo).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom