• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Cont: 2019-nCoV / Corona virus Pt 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
No, the 20 million is the estimate if action is taken. It was 40 million-100 million if no action were taken.

The paper included all countries for which data existed.

Some estimates for the 1918 flu are as high as 50 million deaths.

Probably not too useful arguing about such uncertain numbers.

I base my opinion this won't be as bad as the 1918 flu on the reasoning we have advanced science compared to what they had in 1918. Viruses weren't even recognized in 1918.

They may very well be comparably bad pathogens.
 
This doesnt help with the question of whether I should go inside the store or not

Go ahead.

If it's in aerosol form, a mask won't make any difference and I'm not seeing millions of people being infected while wearing masks.

I have no choice but to shop, so I hope I'm right!

At this point I'm pretty much done arguing about it. The numbers will prove me right.

Good idea. Wait until the measures have impacted on the number of cases and deaths and declare yourself right.

I think it should be obvious that Covid is a more serious illness than the flu.

It should be equally obvious it's a waste of time arguing with someone whose mind is made up. I find that most people with that kind of opinion think losing money is more important than losing lives. Especially old and sick lives.
___________________________

Meanwhile, the next 24 hours will see the millionth confirmed case and the 50,000th death.

Not much growth for a virus which consisted of all of 50 cases just three months ago. That's a multiple of 20,000 in 90 days.

How could anyone say that showed an exponential increase?
 
Yes, thank you, you make very good points and I can see how it is faulty reasoning. That's why I'm on this board. I am a big believer in good evidence and good reasoning. The reason I'm skeptical of this pandemic is because so far I haven't found the evidence persuasive that one exists. I think we will see total combined deaths between flu and coronavirus in the US for the 2019-2020 season of 65,000-80,000, clearly a heavy flu/respiratory illness season, but not the disaster predicted. And then, as I said before, all the people who were wrong will still say I was the one who was wrong because all of the lockdowns are what caused the low number of deaths. I don't see a way out of this conundrum.

One way would be to see the difference in infection and (sadly) deaths between countries that had an early response to the problem vs ones that had a delayed response.

TL;DR
  • Canada and the US have similar infrastructure and similar culture
  • These similarities include a similar approach to the annual influenza season, such as vaccination programs
  • The population of the USA is 8.6 times that of Canada
  • Depending on the source used, the ratio of deaths from influenza and pneumonia in Canada vs the USA are 1:6.2, 1:7.7, or 1:13, roughly similar to the 1:8.6 ratio in the overall population
  • Observation: similar responses to influenza in two similar countries show similar death rates
  • Due to leadership differences, Canada had a demonstrably quicker response to COVID-19 than the US
  • At this stage in the epidemic, the ratio of deaths from COVID-19 in Canada vs the USA is an astonishing 1:46; that is, for every Canadian who has died from COVID-19, 46 Americans have died
  • Observation: different responses to COVID-19 in two similar countries have led to difference outcomes
  • Conclusion: COVID-19 is not like the flu

The details

As I've done more than once, I invite you to look at the difference between Canada and the USA. There are many similarities between the two countries: a random photograph of a small town or medium sized city in the US is almost indistinguishable from one taken in Canada, although there might a few "tells" such as speed limit signs or the presence of a Target store (US only) vs Canadian Tire.

One of these similarities is the influenza season and the publicly available vaccine. Here in Canada the vaccine is pretty much free for the asking, and I suspect it's covered by every health insurance plan in the US. According to Vaccine uptake in Canadian Adults 2019, the overall vaccination rate in Canadian adults was 42%, while the CDC says it was 45.3% in the USA. Therefore, all other things being equal, the flu season should have an equal effect in Canada and the USA, with very similar numbers for deaths per 100,000 population.

Unfortunately, comparing influenza deaths (and deaths from "influenza like illnesses") between the two countries is a perplexing task because sites I've looked at display different results. statistica.com shows "Death rate for influenza and pneumonia in Canada 2000-2017"with a number of 20.2 per 100,000 in Canada and 14.3 per 100,000 in the US (both are for year 2017.) However, wordlifeexpetcency.com's Influenza and Pneumonia graph shows 9.3 for Canada and 14.9 for the USA (year unknown.) The USA number is consistent between the two sites, but for Canada one site's number is double that of the other. worldatlas.comshows 6,235 deaths from influenza and pneumonia in Canada, which translates to 16.4 per 100,000.

For American deaths from influenza and pneumonia, I'll split the difference between the statistica.com number of 14.3 and the wordlifeexpetcency.com number of 14.9 and use 14.6. Ergo, a rough estimate of the total number of deaths from influenza is:

Code:
328,239,523 ÷ 100,000 × 14.6 = 47,922.970358, or 47,923

Depending on the source used, the number of deaths in Canada from influenza and pneumonia can be summarized as follows, based on the current population estimate.

Table 1. Estimate of Canadian deaths from influenza and pneumonia

Rate | Deaths
9.3​
|
3,533
16.4​
|
6,229
20.2​
|
7,672​


Next, I'm going to talk about the Canada to USA population ratio. Wikipedia says the population of Canada "Q1 2020 estimate" is 37,984,728, and the USA "2019 estimate" is 328,239,523. That translates to 8.6 Americans for every one Canadian. (I've been using 8.7 for a while now, but from now on I'll be using the 8.6 number.) All other things being equal, if something happens 1,000 Canadians, we would normally expect the same thing to happen to 8,600 American. (Of course, that's not true for everything: gun deaths in the USA are far than in Canada.)

So, let's take the three different values for Canadian deaths, compare them to the estimated value for American deaths, and compute a ratio for Canada versus the US.

Table 2. Ratio of deaths from influenza and pneumonia for Canada vs the United States

Canadian rate | Canadian deaths | US Deaths | Actual Canada:US ratio | Expected ratio |
9.3​
|
3,533​
|
47,923​
|
1:13​
| 1:8.6 |
16.4​
|
6,229​
|
47,923​
|
1:7.7​
| 1:8.6 |
20.2​
|
7,672​
|
47,923​
|
1:6.2​
| 1:8.6 |

Aside from 1:13 ratio, the ratio of Canadian to US deaths is close to the population ratio of 1:8.6.

Now let's look at the ratio of Canadian deaths to the US deaths for COVID-19. While the president of the United States spent six weeks in February and March denying there was a problem (up to the declaration of a national emergency on March 13,) Canada was enacting measures to slow the spread. Canada first tried a containment strategy starting in early February, but it was too little and too late, so the government switched to a flatten the curve strategy. Pandemic response plans were in place as early as February 24 and aggressive measures started in the early March.

Table 3. Ratio of deaths from COVID-19 for Canada vs the United States as of April 1, 2020 23:55 EDT

Metric | Canada | Expected US number based on 1:8.7 ratio | Actual US Number | Actual Canada:US ratio
COVID-19 cases|
9,713​
|
85,532​
|
216,154​
|
1:22​
|
COVID-19 deaths|
111​
|
955​
|
5,115​
|
1:46​

Here's my conclusion: Canada and the US have a similar level of overall development, culture, and response to influenza. This is reflected in similar numbers for death from influenza, based on a ratio of the population. However, due to different responses to the current pandemic, the US is seeing a far different death rate from COVID-19: for every Canadian who has died from COVID-19, 46 Americans have died. I conclude this is an epidemic, and it's hitting the US harder than Canada.
 
This is nonsense.

How many patients in his hospital have been in in ICU? How many died?

Name of hospital please.

Toronto has 25+ hospitals and Ontario has 37 deaths total as I type this (vast majority from retirement/nursing homes). Canada as a country- 109 deaths.

Let's use conservative numbers and say every Toronto hospital only has 10 critical cases, that's 250 ICU patients, which based on your hearsay means 165 people have died in Toronto alone, not even close to being true.

Hopefully your imaginary ICU physician is better at treating respiratory illness than he is at math.

Update- Total deaths for Toronto -19
 
Go ahead.
Good idea. Wait until the measures have impacted on the number of cases and deaths and declare yourself right

Even the best case projections by those declaring this a pandemic are not expecting numbers that would validate my expectations. So if you were to try to claim such low numbers were the result of the measures being implemented, that would be disingenuous. As another poster said, any US death toll under 100k would indicate I was right.
 
Two Stanford professors of medicine, Dr. Eran Bendavid and Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, explain in an article that the lethality of Covid19 is overestimated by several orders of magnitude and is probably even in Italy only at 0.01% to 0.06% and thus below that of influenza. The reason for this overestimation is the greatly underestimated number of people already infected (without symptoms). As an example, the fully tested Italian community of Vo is mentioned, which showed 50 to 75% symptom-free test-positive persons.

https://web.archive.org/web/2020032...coronavirus-as-deadly-as-they-say-11585088464
 
One way would be to see the difference in infection and (sadly) deaths between countries that had an early response to the problem vs ones that had a delayed response.

You keep making this comparisons as if they're somehow valid. The U.S is a far more populated country with a smaller landmass than Canada. Using population density as a sole metric is simply ignorant.

It's like comparing Alaska to Ontario, run those numbers and get back to me.

Not to mention on a worldwide scale our southern neighbours while not doing the best have a much better survival rate than several European nations which get touted here as being far better off healthwise.

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
 
Last edited:
As another poster said, any US death toll under 100k would indicate I was right.

And if India has 5 million deaths, or the rest of the world has 30 million, will you still be right?

Let's just say at the moment that there isn't enough evidence and that the question can wait three months for an answer.

We'll leave it there, eh?
 
Yes, thank you, you make very good points and I can see how it is faulty reasoning. That's why I'm on this board. I am a big believer in good evidence and good reasoning. The reason I'm skeptical of this pandemic is because so far I haven't found the evidence persuasive that one exists. I think we will see total combined deaths between flu and coronavirus in the US for the 2019-2020 season of 65,000-80,000, clearly a heavy flu/respiratory illness season, but not the disaster predicted. And then, as I said before, all the people who were wrong will still say I was the one who was wrong because all of the lockdowns are what caused the low number of deaths. I don't see a way out of this conundrum.
It's the Y2K thing all over again. I and thousands of other software engineers worked our socks off to fix the damn thing before the deadline, then when we succeeded loads of smug gits who'd been insisting it wasn't a real problem said "see, we were right, there never was a problem".

Unfortunately in this case I don't think the countermeasures will be enough for the reality of the problem to be deniable by even the smuggest of gits, let alone someone prepared to be convinced by the evidence as you appear to be.
 
I want to know how do these idiots get elected? :rolleyes:


Dekalb County Georgia is the center of Hank Johnson’s district and even though I lived in a next door county he was my congressman, all thanks to Mr. Gerry Mander. I worked in Dekalb for 32 years. I think Cynthia McKinney was his predecessor. Prior to that, before redistricting, Ben Lewis Jones AKA Cooter Davenport of the Dukes of Hazard was the congressman from the same 4th district.

You ask how these idiots get elected. Need I say more?
 
Last edited:
<snip wall of text>
Here's my conclusion: Canada and the US have a similar level of overall development, culture, and response to influenza. This is reflected in similar numbers for death from influenza, based on a ratio of the population. However, due to different responses to the current pandemic, the US is seeing a far different death rate from COVID-19: for every Canadian who has died from COVID-19, 46 Americans have died. I conclude this is an epidemic, and it's hitting the US harder than Canada.
There is a separate thread for comparing the US to Canada - please take this discussion there instead of flooding this thread with constant and massive updates and comparisons for just one country.

COVID-19 Numbers, Canada vs. The US
 
Any reason to believe these chinese numbers? I find it hard to believe they are doing far better than western nations who by all accounts have much better healthcare and facilities.

Based on the stats provided if I'm in Belgium I should head over to Wuhan and save myself!


https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/

Let's say I'm skeptical the numbers from China are accurate
 
And if India has 5 million deaths, or the rest of the world has 30 million, will you still be right?

Let's just say at the moment that there isn't enough evidence and that the question can wait three months for an answer.

We'll leave it there, eh?

Yes, I find that quite fair.
 
There is a separate thread for comparing the US to Canada - please take this discussion there instead of flooding this thread with constant and massive updates and comparisons for just one country.

COVID-19 Numbers, Canada vs. The US

Thanks. I hadn't seen that thread until you pointed it out. I'll put responses to the post you quoted and future "The current situation in Canada" posts there.
 
Any reason to believe these chinese numbers? I find it hard to believe they are doing far better than western nations who by all accounts have much better healthcare and facilities.

Based on the stats provided if I'm in Belgium I should head over to Wuhan and save myself!


https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/

Let's say I'm skeptical the numbers from China are accurate

I'm not.. At the end of Jan. China did a strong lockdown in Wuhan including roadblocks into and out of the city. And they implemented stronger social distancing in the rest of China than we currently have in the US. They still had a lot of spread across China but the numbers were small. They simultaneously did testing and contact tracing quarantining the families and associated as soon as someone tested positive. Since they started it so early in Jan the cases outside Wuhan were controlled. They've now relaxed the stricter controls outside Wuhan and are soon to do the same in Wuhan.

Perhaps you missed the stories of Chinese students in the US that were chartering private jets to get back to China considering the US to be unsafe and getting worse rapidly.
 
Last edited:
You keep making this comparisons as if they're somehow valid. The U.S is a far more populated country with a smaller landmass than Canada. Using population density as a sole metric is simply ignorant.

It's like comparing Alaska to Ontario, run those numbers and get back to me.

Not to mention on a worldwide scale our southern neighbours while not doing the best have a much better survival rate than several European nations which get touted here as being far better off healthwise.

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/

Per the request from EHocking, my response is here.
 
Last edited:
This is nonsense.
How many patients in his hospital have been in in ICU? How many died?

Name of hospital please.

Toronto has 25+ hospitals and Ontario has 37 deaths total as I type this (vast majority from retirement/nursing homes). Canada as a country- 109 deaths.

Let's use conservative numbers and say every Toronto hospital only has 10 critical cases, that's 250 ICU patients, which based on your hearsay means 165 people have died in Toronto alone, not even close to being true.

Hopefully your imaginary ICU physician is better at treating respiratory illness than he is at math.

I think you are unfairly dismissive. This is not out of the range of other estimates which have been as low as 25% mortality (comparable with other viral pneumonias), and 95% mortality for those needing ventilation. The UK estimates are about 40%, but a significant number of patients are still in ICU and this value may change.
https://www.icnarc.org/About/Latest...-On-775-Patients-Critically-Ill-With-Covid-19
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54XLXg4fYsc
https://aatishb.com/covidtrends/
The video is from minutephysics and talks about the interactive graph found on the second link. It is an interesting way to look at the data. This quote is from the Youtube page.
"This video is a collaboration with Aatish Bhatia about how to see the COVID-19 tipping point - we present a better way to graph COVID-19 coronavirus cases using a logarithmic scale in "phase space" - plotting the growth rate against the cumulative cases, rather than either of these against time."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom