turingtest
Mistral, mistral wind...
When I cited the professional judgment of one of, if not the, leading DNA experts in the world on the credibility of crucial DNA evidence in a case, not only did the other poster claim an Appeal to Authority, but insisted that expert was a "paid shill". In fact, every single bonafide expert that disagreed with this poster was labeled a "shill" or "bent". Thus is the ability of people to hand wave away that which they do not want to accept.
Yep, pretty standard CT tactics- they taint the criteria by which any objective standard for assessing fact and resolving a question is possible because, for the subject under discussion, the object is not to reach a resolution, but to prolong the discussion (as per JayUtah)- they "win" the argument simply by never, in their minds, losing it.
This may all seem to be veering into OT territory, but I'd argue that it's a valid point when talking about Trump's presidency; it's no accident that a substantial portion of his base is a group of people for whom that CT tactic is a necessary one, a paradigm they need to maintain their belief (in Trump as well as in their more basic god). I mean, of course, the religious fundamentalists- as I've said here before, religion is really just the ultimate conspiracy theory, especially as practiced by fundies. So it should be no surprise that so much of his core base has so little regard for objective fact- it's an obstacle to them, to be waved aside by whatever means they can use, fair or foul, so the question is irresolvable, and opinion, one just as good as any other, reigns supreme. The faith is maintained because it's made indestructible by pure persistence on the one hand and simple attrition on the other- they win by not ever recognizing a standard that could measure loss, and their measure for success is the frustration of people who, in the end, can only shake their heads.
Last edited: