• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

New BF photo

The most important question is how did they get bigfoot up the mountain? I for one find it hard to believe hundreds of slaves towed it up there using a ramp. I find the theory that it flew up there attached to a kite much more...

Exactly. I can't possibly see how Bigfoot could physically ascend a diagonal slope, therefore, it could not have been done. Here is my theory: Atlanteans put Bigfoot up the mountain with kites and pulleys, so he could battle the Bionic Man!
 
Bowl-Snowboarder.jpg
 
I'm guessing that the distance is at least 250m to the object. Would the naked eye be able to pick out hair better than a camera lens at that distance? I do not see any dangling hair.

According to this info

http://www.bigfootforums.com/index.php?showtopic=13519&view=findpost&p=282499


The two summits are about 180 yards apart.. ( 165 meters ? )

Also if it was an animal covered with hair, you would expect it to have reflected a bit more light and shown more detail.. Notice how there is plenty of light to show texture on the rocks and trees..
 
Last edited:
Wow, that does look like Patty.

Note the unlocked knee compliant gait, the thigh rupture, the inhumanly long arms, the fur covered breasts.... It's all there. Patty lives!
 

Attachments

  • Bowl-Snowboarder-Enhanced.jpg
    Bowl-Snowboarder-Enhanced.jpg
    10.8 KB · Views: 21
Wow, that does look like Patty.

Note the unlocked knee compliant gait, the thigh rupture, the inhumanly long arms, the fur covered breasts.... It's all there. Patty lives!

I'm still more convinced because of the obvious aura in the image, as Big Foots are notoriously more connected with Mother Earth. Note how the compliant gait is designed to align the chakras. No, that's not JPEG artifacting! It's real! Cameras don't lie! There is a glowing fruity aura around Sasquatch indicating his mystical connection with Walker Texas Ranger through Chuck Norris' Native-American roots!
 
1280x960 seems a bit small for a 5 MP camera and it's not easy to get a clear zoom on the image

In fairness, though, most digital cams (AFAIK) are not pre-set to their highest resolution, and people who just use them as a "point-and-shoot" camera don't change the setting.

(I know, because I've had mine for three years, and changed the resolution once--moving it down a notch so I had more space for pics.)
 
But it's the photo of a lifetime, Cleon......

A brand new large bipedal hominid strolling on a hill top.

Higher resolution and a bit of zoom and we could really see what they took a picture of.... :D

I would have taken a picture or two immediately at whatever the camera was set at to be sure I got the beastie. Then I would have adjusted the res up and zoomed in for a few shots.

Then I would have been hot after the beastie, since he's not far away. His nice fresh tracks should make for good pics too.
 
But it's the photo of a lifetime, Cleon......

A brand new large bipedal hominid strolling on a hill top.

Higher resolution and a bit of zoom and we could really see what they took a picture of.... :D

I would have taken a picture or two immediately at whatever the camera was set at to be sure I got the beastie. Then I would have adjusted the res up and zoomed in for a few shots.

Then I would have been hot after the beastie, since he's not far away. His nice fresh tracks should make for good pics too.

The first law of the paranormal:
Aliens, their artifacts, and bigfoot will appear only to people armed with a 16mm, plastic-lensed Kodak Instamatic camera, containing 3-year-old film, stored in the glove box of an automobile.
Corrolary to the first law:
If the camera is digital, it was either purchased that same day, sans instruction manuel, or it will be wielded by an individual who thinks "bytes" are what Pit Bulls do, and a pixel is something that lives under rocks in England.
 
The pics were taken between 4:30 and 5:00 PM, which would have been about sundown at that location..

The image metadata has 14:37 as the time but it ispossible that the clock of the camera was not correctly set. (I for one don't bother changing the clock of my camera when I move to other time zones).
 
The image metadata has 14:37 as the time but it ispossible that the clock of the camera was not correctly set. (I for one don't bother changing the clock of my camera when I move to other time zones).

How do you access the metadata?
 
The image metadata has 14:37 as the time but it ispossible that the clock of the camera was not correctly set. (I for one don't bother changing the clock of my camera when I move to other time zones).
The time I gave was quoted from the BFRO report..


14:37 Makes more sense based on shadow length etc..


It just raises the question " why lie about the time ", it doesn't make sense and really doesn't matter outside of the context of a ' Research ' organization that is trying to portray an air of legitimacy...

The report smells of bait for the next BFRO expedition..
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom