2020 Democratic Candidates Tracker Part III

Status
Not open for further replies.
“The people who disrupted that fundraiser were all queer people of color,” Pollydore said. “We’re allowed to want the gay candidate who is running to do better and be better for queer communities of color. There’s nothing homophobic about that.”

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...gieg-san-francisco-queer-activists-fundraiser

It's pretty presumptuous to treat him as the "gay candidate", as if the fact that he's gay obligates him to represent the "gay community" or it's supposed interests.

From the way he's been presenting himself it's clear he's not "the gay candidate", rather he's a candidate that happens to be gay.
 
Good article on the tough financial times ahead for Warren, Biden and (potentially) Klobuchar and Buttigieg.

In just two weeks, the Democratic race will transition overnight from the charming theaters of the early caucus and primary states into a full-scale national campaign, dominated by Gross Ratings Points and pre-roll ads and media appearances instead of handshakes and whimsy. Reporters accustomed to daily press gaggles will begin to see the candidates more on a Delta backseat television than in person. More than a dozen states and territories will vote on Super Tuesday, little more than two days after the polls close in South Carolina’s primary. That short window, every four years, shines a harsh light on whoever emerges from the first four states with a pulse. It reveals which campaigns are serious built-to-last enterprises, and punishes the ones that are flash-in-the-plan flukes, destined only for Wikipedia entries about the 2020 primary race.

And that's the problem for most of the campaigns; they are focused on the next two states (Nevada and South Carolina) just to stay alive, but on March 3, California and Texas are up for grabs along with a whole bunch of other states and territories.

Conclusion: Who's got the money?

Bernie and Bloomie.

The Democratic primary is careening toward a head-to-head clash between Michael Bloomberg and Bernie Sanders, currently the only two candidates with the cash and constituencies to push their candidacies beyond the first four states and Super Tuesday. Who else can scale up? “This is a huge issue,” said David Axelrod, the former Barack Obama adviser. “The cost of competing across 14 states is astronomical and the remaining candidates will expend most of their limited kitties to get there. For Bloomberg, the Super Tuesday ante is lunch money. He will be able to communicate at a high level everywhere. Bernie has a reliable, renewable war chest and universal recognition. For the others, they have to hope to catch a wave of publicity and dollars off of unexpected showings in Nevada and South Carolina.”

I would also point out that the betting markets foresee the same matchup with Sanders currently at 39.0% to win and Bloomberg at 34.6%.
 
Last edited:
Quid Pro Joe Biden told a group of black leaders that black parents can't read or write:

"Joe Biden reportedly shocked a group of black leaders last year when he said that parents in black communities can’t read or write. The comment, reported by The New York Times, is said to have been uttered by the former vice president during a private meeting with black mayors in Georgia."


https://www.thedailybeast.com/biden...ders-that-black-parents-cant-read-says-report

an obvious ploy to get Trump supporters to vote for him instead.
 
Bloomberg is reportedly considering making Hillary his VP candidate. Seems odd and risky, unless his plan is to get elected and then step down in favor of Clinton.
 
Bloomberg is reportedly considering making Hillary his VP candidate. Seems odd and risky, unless his plan is to get elected and then step down in favor of Clinton.

If his team is as clever as I think, this might be a clever way to lower expectations ... in order to exceed them.
Clinton won't agree to be VP unless she could be certain Bloomberg will resign within 24 hours after inauguration.
 
Hillary is from Illinois. Bloomberg is from Massachusetts. Either you're being sarcastic, or your analysis is rubbish.

They both currently reside in New York, which matters for the electoral college. Bloomberg would have to change his official residence to one of the other homes he owns in Florida or Colorado. You may recall that Dick Cheney changed his official residence to Wyoming from Texas in order to run with GW Bush.
 
Bloomberg is reportedly considering making Hillary his VP candidate. Seems odd and risky, unless his plan is to get elected and then step down in favor of Clinton.

Let's guess, this is being "reported" by right-wing media who are parroting the actual Fake News that is being created in Eastern Europe countries to make money and sow dissent?
 
"Billionaire Democrat ousts incumbent, installs preferred candidate."

That's a headline that would destroy the DNC for a hundred years.

Give them some credit - they appear to be giving it a good shot.

Republicans have Never Trumpers; Democrats have Never Berns.

Just a lot more of them.
 
Bloomberg is reportedly considering making Hillary his VP candidate. Seems odd and risky, unless his plan is to get elected and then step down in favor of Clinton.

‘Risky’ in that he might suddenly become suicidal?
 
I really don't want a racist, sexist, out of touch billionaire Republican to win in 2020.

I'm of course referring to Bloomberg
 
I really don't want a racist, sexist, out of touch billionaire Republican to win in 2020.

I'm of course referring to Bloomberg

I don't want him to win the primaries. If he does, though, he'll still be the vastly, vastly lesser evil compared to Trump.
 
Well I just got my friggin primary ballot and what a set up for spoiler votes. Trump is the only GOP candidate and you only have to declare your party when you vote.

I wonder who the spoilers are going to favor and I hope the DNC is paying attention to this pending flaw.
 
I don't want him to win the primaries. If he does, though, he'll still be the vastly, vastly lesser evil compared to Trump.

Between stop-and-frisk, the airspace-closing, journalist-arresting, smash-and-grab operation that ended OWS, and having rules changed to allow himself more terms in office.

Sorry, he's the candidate I am actually 100% ok with skipping on in the general.

He's already done most of the **** we worry Trump might do any day now.

But I'm in an R+10 state, so I get to be principled, secure in the knowledge I will make not one bit of difference at all. So there's that.
 
Between stop-and-frisk, the airspace-closing, journalist-arresting, smash-and-grab operation that ended OWS, and having rules changed to allow himself more terms in office.

Plenty more than that, honestly.

Sorry, he's the candidate I am actually 100% ok with skipping on in the general.

Honestly, I actually like Gabbard less.

He's already done most of the **** we worry Trump might do any day now.

On the positive side, given the "Democrat" side that he's positioning himself on, if he gets caught doing the kind of overtly criminal stuff that Trump keeps getting away with, he'll almost certainly get impeached and removed with the support of the Democrats.

But I'm in an R+10 state, so I get to be principled, secure in the knowledge I will make not one bit of difference at all. So there's that.

Meh. Outcomes are not foregone, especially in cases where huge portions of the legitimate voters just aren't voting (especially out of despair) - aka just about all of the US. Vote!
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom