Belz...
Fiend God
It's a possibility, which can't be ruled out at the moment, and he isn't saying it's anything else.
No, but since it's the only possibility he seems to be excited by, I have to wonder why.
It's a possibility, which can't be ruled out at the moment, and he isn't saying it's anything else.
But it's not the facts I was addressing; it's your constant fan-fiction where hundreds of millions die. Those aren't facts, they're speculation, and it always points in the same direction: catastrophe.
You can cuss all you want but the fact remains that this is what you've been doing all thread long.
It's a possibility, which can't be ruled out at the moment, and he isn't saying it's anything else.
It's out, it's about, and there's no measures that will contain it.
I should start a poll on what the final death toll will be - my entry would be ~3 million worldwide.
That's not true. He claims more than "a possibility":
Yep, working front office for doctors taught me a couple of important rules.
Wash your hands thoroughly and often, and even more important, don't touch your eyes, nose or mouth unless you have freshly washed hands. Sanitizer is better than nothing, but good handwashing and keeping my mitts away from my face kept me from getting everything the patients dragged in, and still protects me when I regularly travel on public transit. Even when it sounds like someone's hacking up a lung two seats back.
In an example of how the hysteria is spreading, a local tenant was summarily evicted from the place she was renting because she took a trip to Malaysia.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-02...m-perth-house-over-coronavirus-fears/11959530
In an example of how the hysteria is spreading, a local tenant was summarily evicted from the place she was renting because she took a trip to Malaysia.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-02...m-perth-house-over-coronavirus-fears/11959530
No, but since it's the only possibility he seems to be excited by, I have to wonder why.
Meanwhile, the WHO has stated this is not a global pandemic right now.
Maybe it isn't as contagious and/or virulent in tertiary infections?
An opinion piece from a rag little better then Daily Fail - although I see they're agreeing with my position on the global economy.
I'll take WHO's word for it at this stage.
A couple of encouraging points are the cruise ships, which give a perfectly sealed-off population to watch. The fact that the numbers are quite low, despite being crammed together on a ship, eating & playing together, raises hope that it might not be as contagious as thought, but give it a few days.
Today's numbers definitely show a levelling off in new infections, with 2500.
The reason this isn't a global problem already is because of the unprecedented measures China has take to stop travel and confine people to their homes.
The jury is firmly out on what happens next.
It does look like it's worse the closer to epicentre you got it, which is encouraging for everyone outside China, but the jury is still out for another week, I'd say.
There's a good graph on this page, which shows the logarithmic rate has slowed to almost flat line: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
As always, time will tell.
Jury still out, but I agree the latest news is encouraging.
The most encouraging news is the rate of climb outside China, which is nothing like logarithmic, ...
One more encouraging point - every province in China, except Shanxi, with only a handful of cases in total, is showing the new infections found below the region's high...
Viruses often drop in virulence after a few generations, and hopefully that's what's we're seeing.
It’s going to kill many millions I would think, we are only seeing the tip of the iceberg so far.
I hope I’m wrong.
They weren't. I posted them for you. Did you not notice?Thank you for taking my comments seriously rather than dismissing them with 'I know better'.
I am sorry for not providing links, but my links would be behind a password protected commercial database and so would be no use to most, but for the lazy reader the abstracts are probably easier than having to click on links.
And Indonesia and Africa supposedly have no cases.Meanwhile, on the flip side, seven UK schools now closed on suspicion: https://www.theguardian.com/world/l...uise-ship-quarantine-cases-latest-update-news
While Singapore looks like being very close to a major outbreak: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-51470363
I flat out do not believe that if Singapore, with superb health & detection systems and easily-tracked people in a small area, has 47 cases and India only three.
If doctors or their front office washed their hands as thoroughly (long, with plenty of soap, scrubbing) as is necessary to wash off the little critters, their skin would be rotten and highly susceptible to ... infections.
If doctors or their front office washed their hands as thoroughly (long, with plenty of soap, scrubbing) as is necessary to wash off the little critters, their skin would be rotten and highly susceptible to ... infections.
Oh, you mean like a surgical scrub? It's amazing those surgeons have any hands left at all.
<snip>
I wonder how many times surgeons wash their hands just before surgery per day? I am sure they will wash their hands for other reasons far more often than that.
And Indonesia and Africa supposedly have no cases.
If it spreads worldwide and kills 1% of the population then 1% of 6k million is 60 million. This means that The Atheist estimate is out by a factor of 20 and he is an optimist.
OK. It spreads all over China, but hardly any cases elsewhere. That is 10 million deaths. The Atheist is still an optimist.
248 deaths and 15,000 new cases yesterday?
I'm hoping there's a problem in the numbers, because if they're right, things are grim indeed.
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/