Cont: The Trump Presidency: Part 19

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is from the Snopes link you provided:



Looks like Snopes is right about that.



What this boils down to is Trump's typical response to any criticism; he makes personal attacks. How dare Krugman have predicted an economic fallout if Trump won and criticize his tariffs, etc?

But Krugman was not alone in that prediction, not by a long shot:


https://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/donald-trump-wall-street-effect-markets-230164






All above quotes from
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/01/...pens-to-the-markets-if-donald-trump-wins.html

The majority of economists agreed that a Trump victory would result in an economic turndown.


They assumed that Trump would honor his promise to cut the deficit.


https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow...rn-despite-trump-s-campaign-promises-n1116951


Instead he is doing the opposite so he can cause another bubble/crash in the stock market.


As for economists predictions, they all get it wrong.
 
Instead he is doing the opposite so he can cause another bubble/crash in the stock market.

Err... not quite, at last check. He's doing what he's doing to try to prevent a normal drop while he's on top as a matter of propping up support for himself. He just doesn't care if the methods used are irresponsible and are eliminating the tools to stabilize and cushion the next drop when it comes.
 
Trump Retweeted

Sean Davis
@seanmdav
Just like James Comey, John Bolton is trying to get rich off of a lie- and leak-fueled campaign to overturn the 2016 election results. I suspect it will work out as well as all of Bolton’s other wars.

John Bolton is running the exact same revenge playbook against Trump that James Comey used. He’s even using the same agent and leaking to the same reporters. All because he’s mad Trump fired him for leaking and trying to start new wars. It’s so boring and predictable.
 
Trump Tweets

I NEVER told John Bolton that the aid to Ukraine was tied to investigations into Democrats, including the Bidens. In fact, he never complained about this at the time of his very public termination. If John Bolton said this, it was only to sell a book. With that being said, the...

...transcripts of my calls with President Zelensky are all the proof that is needed, in addition to the fact that President Zelensky & the Foreign Minister of Ukraine said there was no pressure and no problems. Additionally, I met with President Zelensky at the United Nations...

...(Democrats said I never met) and released the military aid to Ukraine without any conditions or investigations - and far ahead of schedule. I also allowed Ukraine to purchase Javelin anti-tank missiles. My Administration has done far more than the previous Administration.
 
Seems to me you've got not idea what an appeal to authority fallacy is all about.

“Krugman is correct on x because he has this and that degree and a Nobel prize.” would be an Appeal to Authority.

“Krugman likely has a deeper understanding of Economics than the President or an average person on the internet.” is not an Appeal to Authority.
 
“Krugman is correct on x because he has this and that degree and a Nobel prize.” would be an Appeal to Authority.

“Krugman likely has a deeper understanding of Economics than the President or an average person on the internet.” is not an Appeal to Authority.

It would be one thing if Sir Drinks a Lot said he disagrees with Paul Krugman on the economy. Even if he has no academic qualifications he could be right abd Krugman could be wong. Being a professor at MIT or winning the Nobel prize in economics doesn't make him infallible.

That said, the idea that someone of Krugman's very substantial accomplishments is an idiot is risible on the face of it. Especially when it comes from Trump or some random guy who goes by the name of Sir Drinks a Lot.
 
Last edited:
Trump Tweets

The Democrat controlled House never even asked John Bolton to testify. It is up to them, not up to the Senate!

READ THE TRANSCRIPTS!

Schiff must release the IG report, without changes or tampering, which is said to be yet further exoneration of the Impeachment Hoax. He refuses to give it. Does it link him to Whistleblower? Why is he so adamant?
 
Trump Tweets

We are in very close communication with China concerning the virus. Very few cases reported in USA, but strongly on watch. We have offered China and President Xi any help that is necessary. Our experts are extraordinary!
 
Trump Tweets

The Democrat controlled House never even asked John Bolton to testify. It is up to them, not up to the Senate!
I assume everyone here knows that that's a blatant lie.

The house sent a letter to Bolton's lawyers back in October 2019 asking him to testify in November 2019. Bolton's lawyers said he would not testify voluntarily. Meanwhile the white house issued a blanket ban on officials (current and previous) from cooperating with the impeachment hearings.

So yeah, the house asked, Bolton and the white house said no.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/27/poli...subpoena-bolton-testify-fact-check/index.html
 
I assume everyone here knows that that's a blatant lie.

The house sent a letter to Bolton's lawyers back in October 2019 asking him to testify in November 2019. Bolton's lawyers said he would not testify voluntarily. Meanwhile the white house issued a blanket ban on officials (current and previous) from cooperating with the impeachment hearings.

So yeah, the house asked, Bolton and the white house said no.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/27/poli...subpoena-bolton-testify-fact-check/index.html

https://twitter.com/GeoffRBennett/status/1189642650485436417?s=20

Letter from the Chairs of Foreign Affairs, Intelligence, and Oversight/Reform requesting Bolton testify.
 
I assume everyone here knows that that's a blatant lie.

The house sent a letter to Bolton's lawyers back in October 2019 asking him to testify in November 2019. Bolton's lawyers said he would not testify voluntarily. Meanwhile the white house issued a blanket ban on officials (current and previous) from cooperating with the impeachment hearings.

So yeah, the house asked, Bolton and the white house said no.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/27/poli...subpoena-bolton-testify-fact-check/index.html

And you left off the other lie: “it’s not up to the Senate.”

Of course that might be more willful ignorance. Or living in an alternate reality.

Or paradoxically, some combination of all three.
 
You know the president who is totally not a racist, but still thinks those money-loving jews should vote for him?

Well, there's this:

From: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...ntisemitism-jew-coup-press-pass-a9303811.html
To coordinate coverage of Donald Trump’s trip to the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, the White House provided press passes to the usual mix of American news organisations, including Fox News, Reuters and The New York Times. One media outlet stood out: TruNews... TruNews, which Mr Wiles founded as an online radio program in 1999 called America’s Hope, has a history of spreading conspiracy theories and proclaiming an imminent apocalypse. It drew more scrutiny in November after Mr Wiles, in an online video, accused Jewish people of orchestrating Mr Trump’s impeachment. “That’s the way Jews work,” Mr Wiles said. “They are deceivers. They plot, they lie, they do whatever they have to do to accomplish their political agenda. This ‘Impeach Trump’ movement is a Jew coup, and the American people better wake up to it really fast.”

Keep in mind that this is the same white house that tried to revoke the credentials of CNN journalists. Its the same white house that has been accused of being cozy with various conspiracy theorists in the past. Its the same white house that has been accused of racism. You figure they would at least try to look not racist.
 
Trump Tweets

I NEVER told John Bolton that the aid to Ukraine was tied to investigations into Democrats, including the Bidens. In fact, he never complained about this at the time of his very public termination. If John Bolton said this, it was only to sell a book. With that being said, the...

...transcripts of my calls with President Zelensky are all the proof that is needed, in addition to the fact that President Zelensky & the Foreign Minister of Ukraine said there was no pressure and no problems. Additionally, I met with President Zelensky at the United Nations...

...(Democrats said I never met) and released the military aid to Ukraine without any conditions or investigations - and far ahead of schedule. I also allowed Ukraine to purchase Javelin anti-tank missiles. My Administration has done far more than the previous Administration.

At this point, to me, the only thing to do is just annoy the **** out of President Trump. Someone needs to respond to this post by saying “Trump is saying stuff like that because he is jealous: Bolton can write a book and Trump can’t. Heck, Bolton can read a book and Trump can’t.”

It is not productive in any way, but it is truthful.
 
Keep in mind that this is the same white house that tried to revoke the credentials of CNN journalists. Its the same white house that has been accused of being cozy with various conspiracy theorists in the past. Its the same white house that has been accused of racism. You figure they would at least try to look not racist.


Why?

What would be gained by trying to hide it?
 
Its the same white house that has been accused of racism. You figure they would at least try to look not racist.

They succeed as appearing non racist well enough for most of white america who would at least publicly claim to be put off by blatant racism.

This is really how easy it is to be racist and not get called on it in any meaningful fashion. You might have to roll back your comments about white supremacists being good people a bit now and then.
 
Just out of curiosity, has anyone heard Joe or Hunter Biden say they can't wait to testify under oath at the Trump impeachment trial to clear up the allegations of corruption?
 
Just out of curiosity, has anyone heard Joe or Hunter Biden say they can't wait to testify under oath at the Trump impeachment trial to clear up the allegations of corruption?

Why would they do that? They are not on trial and have not been charged with anything. And even if they had the impeachment of Trump due to his own actions would still be valid.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom