Nah they have people to read for them.Do these people ever read the things they write?
Nah they have people to read for them.Do these people ever read the things they write?
Sorry you can't do that. You (as in you Americans) elected Trump to the position he holds in your country. You decided to let him make these types of decisions.
Someone mentioned here or in another thread that people who've lost their homes in other states were moving to California, since if you have to be homeless, it's better to not have to worry about freezing to death at night.
I wonder if there's any data on the number of homeless in "Democrat Party run cities" who are originally from Republican run states.
In recent years, homelessness in New York City has reached the highest levels since the Great Depression of the 1930s. [IOW like increased homelessness all over the country]
In September 2019, there were 62,391 homeless people, including 14,962 homeless families with 22,083 homeless children, sleeping each night in the New York City municipal shelter system. Families make up more than two-thirds of the homeless shelter population.
Over the course of City fiscal year 2018, 133,284 different homeless men, women, and children slept in the New York City municipal shelter system. This includes over 45,600 different homeless New York City children.
Homeless head to cities all over the country because that's where they can congregate with other homeless and that's where they have access to services. And as is well known, cities are bastions of liberals.
It's not all about the weather though we did see in Midnight Cowboy that some flee the cold.[OMG that movie came out in 1969!]
]
Trump Tweets
Had a very good meeting with @kbsalsaud of Saudi Arabia. We discussed Trade, Military, Oil Prices, Security, and Stability in the Middle East!
Well, the first one they admit to. Wouldn't surprise me if a few of the presidents used the theater to screen more "adult" content. Just imagine Nixon watching porn movies. (Try getting THAT image out of your head!)And to bring it back to the White House, the White House family theater was installed in 1942.
The first X-rated movie to be shown in the White House?
Midnight Cowboy.
Well, the first one they admit to. Wouldn't surprise me if a few of the presidents used the theater to screen more "adult" content. Just imagine Nixon watching porn movies. (Try getting THAT image out of your head!)
Although to nitpick... when it was released, Midnight Cowboy got an X rating, but the NC-17 rating had not been created by then. (I think retroactively, Midnight Cowboy has been assigned NC-17, and probably would have got that in the first place if it were available at the time.)
Yes, I think you're right... my apologies. I was going by memory.The film got a R rating during it's 1971 re-issue, which is the rating it still holds. I don't believe it ever officially held an NC-17.Although to nitpick... when it was released, Midnight Cowboy got an X rating, but the NC-17 rating had not been created by then. (I think retroactively, Midnight Cowboy has been assigned NC-17, and probably would have got that in the first place if it were available at the time.)
Not to sound like a broken record, but Trump was elected by a minority of American voters. His opponent received almost three million more votes then Trump did (48%-46%). He won the presidency only because of an electoral system the U.S. has that favors states over individuals. Trump did win a majority of states, despite losing the overall popular vote. Even then his winning margin was less than 200,000 votes out of over 130 million votes cast, a margin of, if my math is correct (it usually isn't), less than 0.15%.
The film got a R rating during it's 1971 re-issue, which is the rating it still holds. I don't believe it ever officially held an NC-17.
This is his standard (and only) negotiating technique - be as belligerent as possible, and people will be kind and give you a low offer.
In practice, it never seems to work on equals - people in business generally told him to **** off because they could find someone else. Cities tend to simply accept a certain amount of homelessness by harassing and arresting the homeless instead of, you know, putting them in the ample housing that sits empty, so they'll likely ignore him.
In international relations, "**** off" usually has far more serious consequences, as we've seen. ANd no, he's not negotiating with Iran, he's throwing a tantrum.
Homeless head to cities all over the country because that's where they can congregate with other homeless and that's where they have access to services. And as is well known, cities are bastions of liberals.
It's not all about the weather though we did see in Midnight Cowboy that some flee the cold.[OMG that movie came out in 1969!]
NYC homeless facts
Homeless are often dumped onto cities by wealthier ( and often Republican) communities. Greyhound Therapy, City Line Drop offs, putting their halfway houses into the cities, etc. etc.
It’s a standard tactic: push ‘em onto the other side of the table and say their side is a mess.
"Not doing anything to support them/harassing them into moving on" is a policy unto itself.
The fact that people move from those areas to where resources are available is not solely a result of the policy of making resources available.
I seriously doubt we want the full consequences of everyplace enacting the former policy.
Essentially herding unwanted people elsewhere and then complaining about how 'elsewhere' got so full of unwanted people...yeah, that's about what I expect from conservative thought.
I swear, just after I think Trump couldn't be a bigger idiot, he proves me wrong.