• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Cont: The Trump Presidency: Part 19

Status
Not open for further replies.
Trump is the first Republican I can ever recall even mentioning it. My experience is they could care less about it. It's kind of like healthcare, but worse. They have no desire to spend money on it. They'd rather have tax cuts.if they do talk about them, its because they're an eyesore or they don't like being panhandled.

You weren’t paying attention. https://www.cnn.com/2013/04/29/opinion/frum-less-homelessness/index.html
In 2002, Bush appointed a new national homeless policy czar, Philip Mangano. A former music agent imbued with the religious philosophy of St. Francis of Assisi, Mangano was seized by an idea pioneered by New York University psychiatrist Sam Tsemberis: "housing first."
The "housing first" concept urges authorities to concentrate resources on the hardest cases -- to move them into housing immediately -- and only to worry about the other problems of the homeless after they first have a roof over their heads.

Or

After many years of advocacy and numerous revisions, President Ronald Reagan signed into law the McKinney–Vento Homeless Assistance Act in 1987; this remains the only piece of federal legislation that allocates funding to the direct service of homeless people.

They may not have done all that you would like but they not only talked they did some positive things.
 
Tom Fitton is head of Judicial Watch. I sincerely doubt Trump reads that twitter feed, but one of his abject flunkies does...Miller?

This is just a piss-weak attempt at provocation, plus a dig at John McCain's legacy again. Reptile can't help himself.

Given how often Trump's retweeted Judicial Watch, I would be surprised if he didn't pay attention to it.

To poke at things, though...

Trump Violates Whistleblower Protection Laws with Retweet of a Suspicious (Fake?) Twitter Shill

Yet another open violation of the law.

Journalist David Cay Johnston: Why Trump tax cut is really a tax increase with interest.

Really short version - a lot of corporations made out like bandits. To the point where, for example,

The sectors with the lowest effective corporate tax rates in 2018 were industrial machinery (-0.6%), utilities, gas and electric (-0.5 percent)

Gotta love paying companies to profit off of us.

Also, things are looking bad in India.
 
You weren’t paying attention. https://www.cnn.com/2013/04/29/opinion/frum-less-homelessness/index.html
In 2002, Bush appointed a new national homeless policy czar, Philip Mangano. A former music agent imbued with the religious philosophy of St. Francis of Assisi, Mangano was seized by an idea pioneered by New York University psychiatrist Sam Tsemberis: "housing first."
The "housing first" concept urges authorities to concentrate resources on the hardest cases -- to move them into housing immediately -- and only to worry about the other problems of the homeless after they first have a roof over their heads.

Or

After many years of advocacy and numerous revisions, President Ronald Reagan signed into law the McKinney–Vento Homeless Assistance Act in 1987; this remains the only piece of federal legislation that allocates funding to the direct service of homeless people.

They may not have done all that you would like but they not only talked they did some positive things.

The McKinney Vento Act or HR 558 had little Republican support. 43 Republicans voted for it. 113 voted against it. As opposed to 221 Democrats to 8 voting against it. It also was a grant act where States could opt out. Guess which ones opted out? It also was the result of horse trading which included more military funding that Ronnie wanted. It's not like the homeless was a priority for the GOP. I never hear Republican candidates give speeches focused on solving homelessness.

I'd love to see the GOP give it the attention it deserves.
 
Trump Tweets

California and New York must do something about their TREMENDOUS Homeless problems. They are setting records! If their Governors can’t handle the situation, which they should be able to do very easily, they must call and “politely” ask for help. Would be so easy with competence!

I'm surprised he didn't tell them to come kiss his feet.
 
His "they can't do anything" attitude will be his downfall. The impeachment is good to get over with, as after that he will feel like he is untouchable. He will do worse things than Ukraine. Then we get to impeach him again right before the election. :D

Especially the way McConnell is clearly telling him this is true.
 
Trump Tweets

Crazy Nancy Pelosi should spend more time in her her decaying city and less time on the Impeachment Hoax!
 

The Onion: Poll Finds 54% Of Americans Approve Executing Trump But Leaving Him In Office

“While nearly all survey participants agreed the president should be executed in a highly public setting, only a minority thinks he should receive a proper burial, with more than half stating that the deceased commander-in-chief should be allowed to complete his four-year term.”

https://politics.theonion.com/poll-finds-54-of-americans-approve-executing-trump-but-1840514848
 
After many years of advocacy and numerous revisions, President Ronald Reagan signed into law the McKinney–Vento Homeless Assistance Act in 1987; this remains the only piece of federal legislation that allocates funding to the direct service of homeless people.

That's a good program; credit where credit is due. At least the demonstration programs had good outcomes. I wonder how it is working now.
 
That's a good program; credit where credit is due. At least the demonstration programs had good outcomes. I wonder how it is working now.

*points at acbytesla's post*

The McKinney Vento Act or HR 558 had little Republican support. 43 Republicans voted for it. 113 voted against it. As opposed to 221 Democrats to 8 voting against it. It also was a grant act where States could opt out. Guess which ones opted out? It also was the result of horse trading which included more military funding that Ronnie wanted. It's not like the homeless was a priority for the GOP. I never hear Republican candidates give speeches focused on solving homelessness.

I'd love to see the GOP give it the attention it deserves.

Indeed. Credit should go where it's due.
 
“The homeless face difficult and sometimes seemingly overwhelming obstacles in getting back on their feet,
The McKinney Vento Act or HR 558 had little Republican support. 43 Republicans voted for it. 113 voted against it. As opposed to 221 Democrats to 8 voting against it. It also was a grant act where States could opt out. Guess which ones opted out? It also was the result of horse trading which included more military funding that Ronnie wanted. It's not like the homeless was a priority for the GOP. I never hear Republican candidates give speeches focused on solving homelessness.

I'd love to see the GOP give it the attention it deserves.

But President Reagan did sign the bill.

Here is the first Bush on homelessness. Not a speech dedicated to homelessness but talking about it.
The homeless face difficult and sometimes seemingly overwhelming obstacles in getting back on their feet,” he said in that message
 
In addition to Trump's Tweets, was something about this interview posted?

Vanity Fair: TRUMP WORRIED UNSIGHTLY HOMELESS ARE HURTING PROPERTY VALUES
According to the president, wealthy foreigners are livid about what the homeless are doing to their investments.

Earlier this month, the Washington Post reported that President Donald Trump had ordered White House officials to launch a massive effort to address homelessness in California, where the number of families living on the streets or lacking adequate housing has “skyrocketed.” At the time, the notion of a guy who’s made his preference for the wealthy abundantly clear expressing any sort of concern for people not rich enough to dodge taxes struck many as deeply uncharacteristic. A man who would sooner run over a homeless person with his golf cart than come face-to-face with one, burning rubber to get away as quickly as possible, suddenly caring about their plight? Really? They say a Brioni suit cannot changed its pinstripes, but maybe the president who famously refused to hire a “poor person” had experienced a come-to-Jesus moment in which he realized not everyone was born to a father wealthy enough to continually bail them out of their numerous ****-ups. Maybe he‘d even realized that his own actions, like making immigrants fearful of accessing federal assistance or aiming to slash health care for low-income Americans or pushing for cuts to public housing, had contributed to the problem.

Curious to know more, reporters asked the president about his sudden interest in addressing homelessness on Tuesday in California, where he told them that…yeah, he just doesn‘t like the sight of homeless people or what they’re doing to the values of real estate properties—especially those owned by foreign investors.

“We can’t let Los Angeles, San Francisco, and numerous other cities destroy themselves by allowing what’s happening,” Trump said aboard Air Force One, adding that the homelessness crisis is causing residents of those cities to leave the country.
“They can’t believe what’s happening. We have people living in our…best highways, our best streets, our best entrances to buildings…where people in those buildings pay tremendous taxes, where they went to those locations because of the prestige,” he said, probably internally shuddering at the idea of homeless people crowding the entrance of Trump Tower. “In many cases they came from other countries and they moved to Los Angeles or they moved to San Francisco because of the prestige of the city, and all of a sudden they have tents. Hundreds and hundreds of tents and people living at the entrance to their office building. And they want to leave. And the people of San Francisco are fed up, and the people of Los Angeles are fed up.” During a speech at a Republican conference in Baltimore last week—a city that Trump has described as “a disgusting, rat and rodent infested mess” where “no human being” would “want to live”—the president said that he had put California on “notice” to “clean it up,” adding, “These are our great American cities and they’re an embarrassment.” The president has also called the homeless situation in San Francisco “inappropriate” and the city “disgusting,” because his empathy runs deep.
 
He's shows so much compassion for theabout the homeless.

Well, if he ends up helping the homeless isn't it a good thing in itself, regardless of the reasons he's doing it? I'd rather someone do something good for bad reasons than do nothing.
 
Well, if he ends up helping the homeless isn't it a good thing in itself, regardless of the reasons he's doing it? I'd rather someone do something good for bad reasons than do nothing.

That would nice, but I don't see it happening.
 
That would nice, but I don't see it happening.

You know how when a whale carcass hits the bottom of the ocean it feeds thousands and thousands of smaller creatures? Perhaps Trump could aspire to the moral height of a rotting whale carcass when it comes to performing good deeds: a benefit to many, despite it being done unwillingly, unconsciously, and in a thoroughly disgusting manner. Yes, I believe Trump's best chance at generating good karma is to emulate a rotting whale carcass. His legacy will be all the brighter once eels eat his eyes, which is something that can't be said for many people. I think that's a wonderfully positive way to look at it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom