It's more realistic to attribute the first year in office to the prior POTUS. Imagine what this chart would look like then.
It's more realistic to attribute the first year in office to the prior POTUS. Imagine what this chart would look like then.
It's almost as if their obsessive hostility to him were about not how he would do the job, but something else about him...Seems odd in light of the fact that GOPers "weren't seriously worried about what he would do..."
You want to explain that contradiction?
It's almost as if their obsessive hostility to him were about not how he would do the job, but something else about him...
It's almost as if their obsessive hostility to him were about not how he would do the job, but something else about him...
I listed the people that matter
Like all ex-Presidents, he benefits from being so much more reasonable than the current crop of extremist candidates from his party.
That word, and "radical" have been so overused and abused by the right that they have little meaning any more.
You might say that only a radical, extremist conservative would use them anymore!![]()
![]()
![]()
You did? Sorry I missed that post. Give me a link.
Any swing voter in a swing state essentially. Why even bother with a primary in California or New York?
Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s campaign told supporters in an email on Friday that, so far, it has raised just over $17 million in the fourth quarter, a significant drop from her fundraising haul during the third quarter.
The memo asks backers to step up giving to the campaign.
“So far this quarter, we’ve raised a little over $17 million. That’s a good chunk behind where we were at this time last quarter,” it says.
“It may have been inevitable that eventually you would have two candidates representing each side of the ideological divide in the party. A lot of smart people I’ve talked to lately think there’s a very good chance those two end up being Biden and Sanders,” said David Brock, a longtime Hillary Clinton ally who founded a pro-Clinton super PAC in the 2016 campaign. “They’ve both proven to be very resilient.”
Democratic insiders said they are rethinking Sanders’ bid for a few reasons: First, Warren has recently fallen in national and early state surveys. Second, Sanders has withstood the ups and downs of the primary, including a heart attack. At the same time, other candidates with once-high expectations, such as Kamala Harris, Cory Booker and Beto O’Rourke, have dropped out or languished in single digits in the polls.
“I believe people should take him very seriously. He has a very good shot of winning Iowa, a very good shot of winning New Hampshire, and other than Joe Biden, the best shot of winning Nevada,” said Dan Pfeiffer, who served as an adviser to former President Barack Obama. “He could build a real head of steam heading into South Carolina and Super Tuesday.”
Joy of joys, the Far Left vs. Center Left dynamic again. Maybe it will prove to be as winning a formula as last time.
Joy of joys, the Far Left vs. Center Left dynamic again. Maybe it will prove to be as winning a formula as last time.
Obama and Trump have so little in common I've more than a little trouble modeling this demographic. What did they both have to offer, aside from testicles?I think Sanders has a great chance of snatching back the Obama Trumpers.
Obama and Trump have so little in common I've more than a little trouble modeling this demographic. What did they both have to offer, aside from testicles?
Joy of joys, the Far Left vs. Center Left dynamic again. Maybe it will prove to be as winning a formula as last time.
I think Sanders has a great chance of snatching back the Obama Trumpers.
It's funny though how Joe Biden is marginally the most favored among Obama-Trump voters, except for Trump himself.
Obama and Trump have so little in common I've more than a little trouble modeling this demographic. What did they both have to offer, aside from testicles?
Hillary Clinton is a loathsome and dreadful person