• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Did Epstein run a World Satanic Ring?

Horizontal sundials are often round, and must be oriented to geographical north and south in order to work properly. Including compass rose points is the most natural thing in the world. It gives the dial a function, local orientation, that visitors can appreciate even if it's cloudy.

Bermuda is parallel with the East coast, so magnetic north would be angled west of true north. Contractor with a pocket compass > Satanic conspiracy.
 
Is there some reason to believe that Epstein's sundial was anything but decorative, and that he was any more competent at setting up a sundial than he was in other things?
 
If you look at Turku Cathedral on Google, it is absolutely square with North.


You might already know that Christian churches are generally built going from west to east, with the main entrance always in the West. The nave and altar are in the East. In older churches the North side tends to be devoid of windows, or if there are some,they tend to be small or behind the pulpit in the North West side (behind the priest/pastor). This is because it was believed the devil lurked in the north side and that was where he came in and that it was safe to have a window behind the pastor.

Graves face feet to the east, so come resurrection day, you'll be facing Jesus rising in the East. The pastors are laid to rest in the opposite direction so the congregation can face their pastor as they all arise from the graves together on Judgment day.

Interestingly, I note the door to Epstein's Temple is approached from the West or appears barred from the West (it is painted on but looks realistic). Maybe you are not to enter from the West.

I wonder if actually the main door is in the east, which one would expect if is the temple is the antithesis to Christianity. The animal/birdlike sculptures might be placed on the west roof to keep watch the Christian elements away. Rather like Christian angels keeping watch on top of churches.

Just saying.
 
Epstein was an opportunistic financial guy and probably swindler and blackmailer. If he was the only one to rise up from nothing to become wealthy in the time-span of 1995 to 2005 it would be strange, but the fact is that he was just one of hundreds who realized the FEC, the FTC, and the banks were not paying attention, and handing out NINJA loans like cheap candy. Had I known this was possible I would have done the same thing.

All of the people he met, all of the people who frequented his parties and his island cannot be called his friends. Some of them certainly can but most can be found in the society pages in photographs of other wealthy individuals who throw massive elegant parties and invite A-list celebrities and people of note.

And by the way, while you're on this board you should ask some of our scientists if their work is well funded, and if they'd go to a party full of rich people if it meant a chance to get an endowment or a grant for their work. None of them would- knowingly - hangout with a billionaire pedophile, but I haven't met a research scientist who doesn't have an eye out for extra money.

My problem with the Satanic line of nonsense is that it's pedestrian cut & paste CTism. There is no real investigation but just dressing up old CT's with Epstein accouterments and then pretending it's new proof of a failed CT. You list the well-known names but who else hung out with Epstein and Maxwell? How much influence did they have, and I'm not talking theoretical Clinton BS, I'm talking people who can pick up a phone and shut down an FBI or DoJ investigation. I only ask because that is a very short list of people. I won't hold my breath for an answer because that requires actual research, which is work, and CTist never do the hard work.

Soon Maxwell will be in the news again as she "comes forward". Her people have already reached out to favorable media outlets and she will discuss the trouble with his royal highness, but not much else.

For the record, a few years ago after a TED Talk Epstein had lunch with Bill Gates and Bezos at an Indian Restaurant around the corner from where I work, and since I eat there too I'm obviously part of Epstein's cult.
 
Witnesses who claim Epstein had entourages of thirty or so. 'Sex slave' Chantau Davies claims she procured at least fifty of her friends 'between 14 -16' for Epstein and Virginia says something similar, but ages unspecified.

All riiiight, so Epstein liked young flesh. So what? He had the money to attract them, whether by grooming or by a straightforward commercial deal.

But wait!

These girls were not just for his own use. This is where it becomes sinister: he was supplying Bill Clinton, Donald Trump and Prince Andrew - allegedly - amongst another 'one thousand names', according to an unsealed court deposition.

What?

Makes Dan Brown look seriously lightweight in comparison.

None of this has anything to do with Satanism.
Perhaps I'm not making myself clear.
DO YOU HAVE ANY EVIDENCE THAT EPSTEIN, THE CLINTONS, THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND PRINCE ANDREW AND THE REST OF THE BRITISH ROYAL FAMILY ARE SATANISTS?
 
… For the record, a few years ago after a TED Talk Epstein had lunch with Bill Gates and Bezos at an Indian Restaurant around the corner from where I work, and since I eat there too I'm obviously part of Epstein's cult.

OMG first the Satanist pedophiles take over pizza and now they want to despoil Indian food too. This is a step too far. Something must be done.
 
I actually know to satanists they wanted nothing to do with Him, they think satin is the anti establishment anti Religion God of anarchy. They are Anarchist not pedifiles.
 
His buddies included the Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak, Bill Clinton, Trump, Prince Andrew and a whole long list of scientists, who found him shallow but hey, here's a multi billionaire who could help sponsor their next project, paper or research for a doctorate. He dined with Dr. Stephen Hawkings, Pinker, Dawson, Oliver Sacks, Stephen Jay Gould - the list goes on and on.

But who was this guy? How did he earn such bring bucks when truth be told he was mediocre (just one client? Really?) and the scientist community found him shallow and his scientific knowledge superficial.

What next, you'll complain the Kardashians are popular too? It's America, people make or fake it all the time for no particular reason that we can fathom.
 

Back
Top Bottom