• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

The Trump Presidency: Part 18

Status
Not open for further replies.
President Trump: “Based on the things I’ve seen, the Democrats have no case, or a weak case, at best.”

When it comes to impeachment cases in general, I’m having a hard time thinking of people less qualified to judge the strength of a case. When it comes to his own case, there is without a doubt no one less qualified to judge a case’s strength.
 
Trump Tweeted

“Based on the things I’ve seen, the Democrats have no case, or a weak case, at best. I don’t think there are, or will be, well founded articles of Impeachment here.” Robert Wray, respected former prosecutor. It is a phony scam by the Do Nothing Dems!
@foxandfriends


I don't know if it's the same guy, but searching for "Robert Wray prosecutor" only comes up with Trump's Tweet and Robert Wray PLLC, a "boutique international law firm" that appears to specialize in international trade and finance. Their website says that Wray was appointed by Nixon to serve as General Counsel of the U.S. Agency for International Development. No mention of being a prosecutor.
 
President Trump: “Based on the things I’ve seen, the Democrats have no case, or a weak case, at best.”

When it comes to impeachment cases in general, I’m having a hard time thinking of people less qualified to judge the strength of a case. When it comes to his own case, there is without a doubt no one less qualified to judge a case’s strength.

Where is it where it was something like, you are in the unique position of having a defendant who says they didn't do it. It was a movie, but I don't know which one (maybe My Cousin Vinny?)

But, yeah, ok, we have established that the accused doesn't think the the prosecution has much of a case.

(but notice, he is now admitting that there could be a case, but it is "weak." So much for the "perfect" phone call)

How many Trumpets would put any significance in such a thing if it were a black man accused of a crime?
 
Why are the final Kentucky votes so slow coming in? Remote Scottish islands get their votes counted quicker than this ;)
 
So if there were some type of civil war, who would be shooting at whom.

I mean, there won’t be uniforms, will there? Do the Trumpsters just shoot at people driving cars with Bernie stickers? do they go down to the state legislature? do they go to the county clerk’s office and write down the names of the folks that voted in the Democratic primary?

ETA
I was thinking maybe there could be a shibboleth.
Then I realized that the test might be to assume that people who use whom correctly do not support President Trump.

Wait, I’ve got it. At the risk of being overly meta, people who know what the word shibboleth means probably correlate pretty well with the never-Trumpers.
 
Last edited:
You start by arming up and getting ready for when they try to start Civil War II. When they've exhausted all legal options, they'll turn upon the nonbelievers. They answer only to a god of vengeance. Prepare to defend yourself and your family against them.
/semi-hyperbole


ETA: completely ninja'ed by the argument about what to call the war that destroys American democracy
 
Last edited:
So if there were some type of civil war, who would be shooting at whom.

I mean, there won’t be uniforms, will there? Do the Trumpsters just shoot at people driving cars with Bernie stickers? do they go down to the state legislature? do they go to the county clerk’s office and write down the names of the folks that voted in the Democratic primary?


Yeah, it will probably be something like that. Yugoslavian civil war type ethnic cleansing. Local militia groups deciding to "finally do something about those people". In some places the police will try to stop it, in other places, they'll ignore it, or even be part of the militia. Whenever the military shows up, they'll stomp the **** out of anyone stupid enough not to fade into the shadows, but once they're gone, the militias will come back out.
 
Yeah, it will probably be something like that. Yugoslavian civil war type ethnic cleansing. Local militia groups deciding to "finally do something about those people". In some places the police will try to stop it, in other places, they'll ignore it, or even be part of the militia. Whenever the military shows up, they'll stomp the **** out of anyone stupid enough not to fade into the shadows, but once they're gone, the militias will come back out.

Simply poison the nation's supply of chewing tobacco. We'll be more liberal than Canada within a week.
 
I thought it was understood that Trump is a plant to identify seditious elements in the population by selling them Red Hats - the next Democrat President can have them all rounded up and send to FEMA re-education camps.
 
I thought it was understood that Trump is a plant to identify seditious elements in the population by selling them Red Hats - the next Democrat President can have them all rounded up and send to FEMA re-education camps.

The wearing of baseball caps when not playing baseball deserves punishment.
 
So if there were some type of civil war, who would be shooting at whom.

I mean, there won’t be uniforms, will there? Do the Trumpsters just shoot at people driving cars with Bernie stickers? do they go down to the state legislature? do they go to the county clerk’s office and write down the names of the folks that voted in the Democratic primary?

Well in 2016 my wife was threatened at a gas station for having a bernie sticker.
 
Trump Tweeted

Just had a meeting with top representatives from Egypt, Ethiopia, and Sudan to help solve their long running dispute on the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam, one of the largest in the world, currently being built. The meeting went well and discussions will continue during the day!
 
Trump Tweeted

Just had a meeting with top representatives from Egypt, Ethiopia, and Sudan to help solve their long running dispute on the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam, one of the largest in the world, currently being built. The meeting went well and discussions will continue during the day!


So, are we taking odds on the dam never being built, vs. being built incredibly shoddily because Trump encourages them all to shaft their contractors?
 
The Republican hasn't conceded yet, and it was mentioned in the 2019 election thread that there's a small chance of the Republican legislators actually deciding the winner.


He might mean there will be a lot of winning, if they do things right.

I thought I had read somewhere that if they tried having the legislator's decide the election that it's possible that violates there is grounds for a lawsuit. I'm trying to find the article now.
 
So, are we taking odds on the dam never being built, vs. being built incredibly shoddily because Trump encourages them all to shaft their contractors?

It's all a misunderstanding. Trump announced he planned to meet with them and they responded "big damn deal!" Now he thinks he's doing a construction project.
 
Trump Tweets

A lot of winning in Kentucky. Check out the numbers.

Our big Kentucky Rally on Monday night had a massive impact on all of the races. The increase in Governors race was at least 15 points, and maybe 20! Will be in Louisiana for
@EddieRispone on Wednesday night. Big Rally!

Does he know what the results are? It's a blue sweep.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom