No, I prefer to think of myself in terms of a living functioning entity, that's all. And if you find that to be wholly self-referential, that's your problem.I suppose he thinks the whole universe operates based on what he wants to be true...
No, I prefer to think of myself in terms of a living functioning entity, that's all. And if you find that to be wholly self-referential, that's your problem.I suppose he thinks the whole universe operates based on what he wants to be true...
So? Can you be more specific?Actually, you are right but I'm trying to test something.
Which is to say everything falls under its domain.Err. No. Omni = all. Potency = power. Omnipotency = all-powerful.
So, how do you speak of anything that doesn't fall outside of a particular domain? It would be wholly self-referential to that domain would it not?If an explanation is circular then you haven't defined anything.
So if God is omnipotence he should be able to kill himself.
Now there are two possibilities either he can kill himself or not. If he can kill himself he is able to die so he isn't omnipotence.
And if he can not kill himself he is not omnipotence.
So the only possible conclusion is God is not omnipotence.
So, come to find out, after all, that there is only one master over reality.1/666 x 666/1 = 666/666 = 1/1 = 1
Yes, but how could wholeness destroy itself? ... If it was a matter of could, does it mean He would? It would certainly be within His power not to.So if God is omnipotence he should be able to kill himself.
Now there are two possibilities either he can kill himself or not. If he can kill himself he is able to die so he isn't omnipotence.
And if he can not kill himself he is not omnipotence.
So the only possible conclusion is God is not omnipotence.
Yes, but how could wholeness destroy itself? ... If it was a matter of could, does it mean He would? It would certainly be within His power not to.
The thing is, only He would have the power to do so.It is not the matter of how he kills himself or even if he would. It is about the possibility of him being able to do so and that alone is the point against God's Omnipotence.
1/666 x 666/1 = 666/666 = 1/1 = 1
Yes, and perhaps you should begin to speak in terms of wholeness, instead of the scatter-brained philosophy you propose? Are you at all familiar with the story of Humpty Dumpty?
On the subject of omnipotence:
"Naomi! Sex, at noon! Taxes," I moan.
I bet God can't do that. In fact, I'll bet 1/666th of my soul that God can't post another, better palindrome in the post immediately following mine, against 1/666th of His powers.
Pathetic? No. It's just that every once in awhile even I need a little back up.BTW - does anyone else find it just SAD - I mean, tragic in the extreme - that Iacchus will post something, then quote his own post in a reply? Is that pathetic, or what?
Yes, please...back up.Pathetic? No. It's just that every once in awhile even I need a little back up.
Was he? Or, maybe he was just a big "egg head" and got a little bit top heavy?Humpty Dumpty was pushed.