Vixen
Penultimate Amazing
1) Hmmmm, your attempted analogy looks a little..... irrelevant?
2) Again, please read what I actually wrote. My post was written a) to counteract your specious claim that high RFUs imply blood; b) to explain to you that RFUs are nothing more than a measure of the reliability of a DNA profile in relation to background noise, and thus in effect they are a measure of the "purity" of a DNA-bearing sample (irrespective of what tissue/fluid that sample comes from); and c) to explain to you that the actual height of RFUs on an output chart are simply a function of how and by how much the lab analyst has chosen to amplify the sample in the machine - therefore "high peaks" are meaningless in and of themselves; what matters is the height of those peaks relative to the height of background peaks*
* And while we're on that topic, this is one of the very many mistakes Stefanoni made in the lab: she cranked up the amplification (well beyond the manufacturer's recommended upper limit) to get the "high peaks" she desired, but of course this also raised the peaks of the background noise - to a level which effectively invalidated the reliability of the subject peaks. What a surprise........
Eminent forensic professor Torre who was present as the defence expert witness did not complain. The defence can make an application to the court at any time (in fact, any of the parties can) should they have any legal concerns. The defence had none at all.
PS Please can you stop using that horrible phrase, 'in and of itself'.
Last edited:
