• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Electric universe theories here.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sol88 said:
Strawman.

Show me the passage where Don Scott says the Sun is powered by a giant inter-galactic current.

:D
Click to expand...
Thanks! :)

It’s fairly rare that you openly admit that a Electric Universe High Priest cannot back up such a key part of the dogma, dogma that can be found on the Thunderdolts website, in key publications such as Dogs and Thunderdolts, and elsewhere. But, here we are ... :p

So perhaps you can provide a quantitative explanation of how a giant inter-galactic current powers the Sun?
 
He called it. :D

You have no mechanism. :D

How do you feel, cranks have shown up mainstream...again.
 
Last edited:
Sol88 said:
https://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/2015/02/11/donald-scott-modeling-birkeland-currents-part-1-eu-workshop/

Don Scott called it, see the above.


Luckily, cojones116 had to Email ‘ol mate and correct him, otherwise.

Birkeland currents... :D
Click to expand...

And what has any of that got to do with anything? What is counter-rotating? Black hole accretion disks? EU loons don't even believe in BHs, so how the hell has Scott predicted anything? That is just more falsification of EU woo. So, what the hell have Birkeland currents got to do with anything?
 
Outplayed by a crank!

How’s it feel?

Or you going to argue the toss? Bit like Thornhill predicting two flashes from deep impact, as observed.

How much ice was mainstream expecting again?

Not so good was it? One of the reasons the Principal Investigator, said quite famously, we once thought comets were mostly ice, although our understanding is evolving towards mostly...ROCK.

No porky pies, that’s what he said

Mainstreams got nothing left in the tank. :blush:
 
Last edited:
jonesdave116 said:
And what has any of that got to do with anything? What is counter-rotating? Black hole accretion disks? EU loons don't even believe in BHs, so how the hell has Scott predicted anything? That is just more falsification of EU woo. So, what the hell have Birkeland currents got to do with anything?
Click to expand...

Black hole are plasmiods, counter rotations expected and observed!

Mainstream got jack.
 
Sol88 said:
Outplayed by a crank!

How’s it feel?

Or you going to argue the toss? Bit like Thornhill predicting two flashes from deep impact, as observed.

How much ice was mainstream expecting again?

Not so good was it? One of the reasons the Principal Investigator, said quite famously, we one thought comets were mostly ice, although our understanding is evolving towards mostly...ROCK.

No porky pies, that’s what he said

Mainstreams got nothing left in the tank. :blush:
Click to expand...

Lol. So, you can't answer the question? What have Birkeland currents got to do with counter-rotation of black hole accretion disks? Either answer, or shut up.
And Thornhill has never been right about anything. He predicted a pre-impact flash. Didn't happen. He predicted it would be seen in x-ray. It wasn't. No electric woo happened. And Pete Schultz predicted, based on lab experiments, a multiple flash scenario before Thornhill. And published it. And was right. The idiot Thornhill, however, was wrong. As shown by the total lack of electric woo seen by Chandra and SWIFT. However, that was something else he never told his dumb, trusting acolytes about.
 
Sol88 said:
Black hole are plasmiods, counter rotations expected and observed!

Mainstream got jack.
Click to expand...

Lol. Plasmoids! Hahahahahahahaha! Come on, Einstein, read the papers on Sgr A* and M87, look at the stellar orbital data, and tell us how plasmoid woo explains those orbital data, from which we can calculate the masses. You can't. However, I can. But only by using Kepler's 3rd law, and that includes no EM woo.
Making stuff up does not count as science. Whenever science is required, you run a mile.
 
Oh, crap.

You’ve gone and wheeled out the big guns now.

Einstein... can’t argue with that.

You win.

:rolleyes:
 
Einstein, plasma ignoramus.

Like others here.

Dude was a tripper.

Today's scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality.

Nikola Tesla
Click to expand...
 
Leaving only the parts relevant to the topic of this thread, electric universe theories ...

Sol88 said:
Outplayed by a crank!

How’s it feel?

Or you going to argue the toss? Bit like Thornhill predicting two flashes from deep impact, as observed.

:blush:
Click to expand...
Wait, what?

He did?

When?

What was actually observed?

Primary sources please.

And how is this relevant to electric universe theories, the topic of this thread?
 
Tell me as I’m curious. What work did Einstein do with plasma?

You know 99.6% of the universe.

Nuth’n

Maths to hard.
 
Sol88 said:
Tell me as I’m curious. What work did Einstein do with plasma?

You know 99.6% of the universe.

Nuth’n

Maths to hard.
Click to expand...

And what have Einstein and plasma physics got to do with each other? Gravity dominates at macro scales. Plasma is irrelevant to Einstein's theories. Unless you are modelling relativistic plasmas. In which case you need Einstein.
 
On the other side of the argument the Universe is infinite and plasma dominates at the macro-scale, as observed.

Cosmic-void-1.jpg


The large-scale structure of the Universe consists of filaments and clusters of normal matter separated by voids, where there is very little matter. It’s been described as “Swiss cheese-like.” The filaments themselves are made up of galaxy clusters and super-clusters, which are themselves made up of stars, gas, dust and planets. Finding out that we live in a void is interesting on its own, but its the implications it has for Hubble’s Constant that are even more interesting.
Click to expand...
and PLASMA!!!! they forgot it, again.

Those filaments are Birkeland currents. This is why everything ROTATES (gravity cant do that) AND we have COUNTER ROTATION as expected in an ELECTRIC UNIVERSE. :D

Vast electrical circuits threading the infinite universe.

no begin, no end.
 
Last edited:
What does this have to do with the electric universe theory, the topic of this thread?

Sol88 said:
On the other side of the argument the Universe is infinite and plasma dominates at the macro-scale, as observed.

[qimg]https://www.universetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Cosmic-void-1.jpg[/qimg]

Vast electrical circuits threading the infinite universe.

no begin, no end.
Click to expand...
Source, as in relevant, peer-reviewed paper, please.

FWIW, I recall images like this are from simulations.

Simulations of what?

The distribution of dark matter, assuming matter is distributed in a way that is consistent with the CMB observations. No electrical currents, not even plasma.

But maybe I am mis-remembering ...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom