I'm convinced that 90% of complaining about "OMG now I have to repeat my problem to you! I just explained it to the other guy!" comes from people who just vomit out their issue in one long unbroken stream of consciousness data dump to everyone.
Yes, you're absolutely right, and I should have been more careful when I said that. Biometric methods should be one factor in a multi-factor authentication system.No! This is a lie that smart phone and laptop makers have been pushing on the public for years now.
Biometrics should be used only for authentication, that is, showing you are who you claim you are. It's the "user name" part of a user name/password pair. They should not be used for authorization, that is, granting you access to systems.
Why? You have only one fingerprint or face. If people who aren't you figure out how to bypass the biometrics, they have complete access to the system and you can't lock them out. ("Sorry, George, the Cardassians have figured out how to bypass the retina scan and can now access Starfleet's weapons systems. We'll either have to revoke your access completely or gouge your eyes out.")
A better approach is to use biometrics for authentication and a secure token for authorization. That way if the authentication part is compromised, the authorization token can be revoked and re-issued.
NSFWNo! This is a lie that smart phone and laptop makers have been pushing on the public for years now.
Biometrics should be used only for authentication, that is, showing you are who you claim you are. It's the "user name" part of a user name/password pair. They should not be used for authorization, that is, granting you access to systems.
Why? You have only one fingerprint or face. If people who aren't you figure out how to bypass the biometrics, they have complete access to the system and you can't lock them out. ("Sorry, George, the Cardassians have figured out how to bypass the retina scan and can now access Starfleet's weapons systems. We'll either have to revoke your access completely or gouge your eyes out.")
A better approach is to use biometrics for authentication and a secure token for authorization. That way if the authentication part is compromised, the authorization token can be revoked and re-issued.
NSFW
There's always the BOFH way; shovel, roll of carpet and sack of lime.Well today I learned that because of the latest reorg I get another new boss.
My fourth in as many years.
It's annoying because 1) I hate training new bosses and 2) I really really like this one I have right now.
![]()
Bleah.
NSFWI have it on good authority that all human anuses are unique, i.e. they have different patterns of fissures, etc. So I am dreading the day when some officious bean-counter is going to insist on using this as a unique personal identifier. Can you imagine designing the interface??![]()
LOL! Been a busy week and I needed a laugh, thanks.So the Grey Aliens are just authenticating?
DuckDuckGo does not tailor search results at all. That's the whole point.
So the Grey Aliens are just authenticating?
Interfacing.LOL! Been a busy week and I needed a laugh, thanks.
Which is what I was saying. Google knows who you are and what you want, so it gives better results.And their usefulness as a search engine suffers for it.
NSFWI have it on good authority that all human anuses are unique, i.e. they have different patterns of fissures, etc. So I am dreading the day when some officious bean-counter is going to insist on using this as a unique personal identifier. Can you imagine designing the interface??![]()
I love being too. It is great.I don't know about you, but I really love being
talked over while I'm trying to explain something.
Knowing what browser and OS are being reported in the request header isn't the same as knowing who you are and what you want. If people are avoiding Google searches because they're afraid of that, then they're stupid. If DDG is intentionally ignoring that, then they're exploiting stupid people.Which is what I was saying. Google knows who you are and what you want, so it gives better results.
It has the unintended side effect of creating search bubbles, where Google gives you results that it thinks you want as opposed to what you need. It's probably good for technical topics, but for controversial ones it only serves to amplify the echo chamber. For things like medical information it can be a killer, if Google decides you're into alternative medicine and fails to show you results from more reputable sites.Knowing what browser and OS are being reported in the request header isn't the same as knowing who you are and what you want. If people are avoiding Google searches because they're afraid of that, then they're stupid. If DDG is intentionally ignoring that, then they're exploiting stupid people.
No DST in Brazil in 2019
2019-04-11
The government of Brazil has announced that there will be no DST in Brazil in 2019.
Parts of Brazil were scheduled to observe DST (summer time) from 3 November, 2019 to 16 February 2020. This now seems to be canceled, although no decree has been made yet.
I have such mixed emotions!
On the one hand, YAY Brazil!!! Wish we'd do that.
On the other hand, oh crap - timezone changes in my future.