• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Infinite! In Search of The Ultimate Truth.

Matthew Ellard said:

Here is your first version of your manifesto. Let us all have another jolly good laugh at you:

Originally Posted by tazanastazio View Post
GOD IS THE INFINITE AND THE INFINITE IS GOD

God is the Infinite; the Infinite Intelligence, Matter and Energy (this idea is perhaps what the meanings of “Father”, “Son” and “Holy Spirit” may also symbolize). Any form of matter, is simply particles in a different formation and every situation is regarded as "negative or "positive" depending on its effect on the well being of the existence experiencing it.........as for example species with animal like and even monstrous features as portrayed in sci-fi works of fiction, would bear the question of whether those beings are part of a group of beings of an already higher level of existence, that chose directly or indirectly to separate itself from the Infinite God (by means of choosing to follow God’s directions and serve the purpose of their existence within the Infinite, or not, as the example in Genesis of the 1/3 of the Angels who rebelled against God and were cast out from heaven shows), they could of course evolve an altered image by means of misusing technology (radioactivity), if God had allow for their species to exist for that long of a time interval after He had sent them His messenger (every human level of existence would have received the messenger of God at a similar time interval within their evolution) :p
Click to expand...


You have built a glassy, fantasy world, in which you fancy yourself the "king critic" of other people's writings and it is falling apart. If you could see how pathetic you begin to appear you would have the wisdom to save some of your imaginary "status."

First, after he got his behind whooped repeatedly, he Googled me, found a picture of mine, and posted it in the other skeptic site blog. His lame excuse that a) I "fascinate" him, b) He has nothing better to do in his life but to entertain himself by criticizing other people's writing 24 hours a day.

Now, hadn't I seen what a coyote he can be, based on his behavior to others; let alone that he is the king and master of omitting, making up, misrepresenting, twisting and inventing of statements, to misrepresent those of others; cutting a phrase here from people's quotes, misparaphrase them there, insert some doubt elsewhere; and when that fails insult the other person's intelligence, and call the "innocuous" names, to fog things up; mud them up a little bit to a whole lot; I would still attempt to end this in a gentle manner, thinking "perhaps that's all he's got going on in his life." What a sorry example of a true cliche court- appointed attorney; used car salesperson! What a carpetbagger! The ignorant deserve understanding, and even pity for their wrong doings. But you are not ignorant! You would pretend that you didn't understand even at the expense of acting the fool, just to score a point in a debate and to feed your ego as a "Master-debater." I mean now all of sudden, to Matthew's bizarre way of comprehension of things, I "hinted" I was "Jesus!" What a cunning weasel! If I had a pick matey, I'll be Leonidas, or Alexander the great, or Achilles; You matey, I regard you, more like Don Quixote, or Mussolini; or at best Napoleon!

Having nothing else to say; having all your points used up, and all your arguments exhausted, without achieving the two-fold desirable outcome; to prove me wrong and yourself the king of the world of the skeptic forum; you went back to your den to lick your wounds, because your pride cannot ever fathom to be proven wrong, and having all your silly arguments backfiring; YOU DUG THE ARCHIVES FROM 2010 and 2013 BECAUSE A 10 - 16 PAGE WRITING of 2017 - 2019 (depending on the font); would not serve your purpose. Matey, you shouldn't be laughing nor crying, you should ring up a psychologist or perhaps a psychiatrist. But since you made the effort and searched for, and scrolled up and down, and read and reread, and copied and pasted, the "first version" of what you call "my manifesto", let's see what you dug up.

Was I more religious a few years back? Sure I was! And I was even more when I was 10! My grandmother would take me and my brother to church back in the small town where we grew up in Greece, almost every single Sunday, since we could remember! Then you have Christmas and Eastern and what not. In school we would be taught of the Bible in every single grade; even the details of what takes place during Sunday mass. I did say I grew up like a Shepherd dog. Then I emigrated to the States. I read Sagan, I read more about Einstein, a little bit of Dawkins a little bit of Hawking. I moved around the country, I did all kinds of jobs, I joined the US Army, I went oversees. I met religious and non-religious people of all kinds and walks of life; New York, Los Angeles, Nashville, San Antonio, Miami, Mosul - Iraq; "I've been every where man." I read my Greek philosophers a little more; also Hugo, Tolstoy and Dostoevsky and others, Louis L'Amour and William W Johnston. Around 2009 - 2013, I started scribbling down a few things, from a philosophical concept that started to take shape in my mind early in my twenties, while I was trying to make sense of it all in the process. I was more religious back then, more of a philosopher later.

I got to search my computer see if I have what you so eagerly searched and dug up mate, thanks; good for old memory sake - I'm sure I have written some quite interesting stuff back then upon which I can write something up later, or even shake my head and say, "I don't know how this made sense back to me then, and I don't see it now"; like with so many other things we do when we are younger than today. In what Matthew here dug up from "the archives," I explored the conflicting ideas of positive-negative, good vs evil, "Angels and Demons" as the famous title of the well known novel and movie with Tom Hanks reads. Because these ideas, are not just mine mate; they are yours and everybody else's as well! And if you say they are not, I won't have to say anything more to prove that you are the liar! Before you shoot yourself for the - I lost count - time in the foot again, have you ever had a nightmare? This is how I explained all the aforementioned on the 2017 - 2019 "version of my manifesto":

"When we under the control of our feelings, instead of our feelings being under our control, when we are possessed by fear and panic, when we are addicted to act in ways that could have dire and even catastrophic results; it would be, figuratively speaking, as if we were controlled and tortured by demons. A person sees a skull of a goat, ugly thing that it is, and scary enough to engage the minds of the curious, and associates it with the devil. He then can use it as a means to inflict fear in the hearts of the unfaithful; some of which in order to appease the devil, because they are afraid of him, they form a religious sect; another religion is formed. You, seeing the image at some point in your life, and being a little over-stressed and worried not to loose your job, wake up in the middle of the night because your subconscious has associated the image of the skull of the goat, with a distorted similar shape in your dream; you just had a nightmare, say a prayer to calm down or get over it. Seriously, if indeed there are superior beings spying over the Earth, don't they have anything better to do in the whole galaxy, or clusters of them? Do they need to torture us for entertainment?"

Matey, you said "after two months" I'll erase my stuff and disappear. I haven't erased my post 2 years now. I am still here, and you still struggle and fail to prove me wrong. The way I see it, you being obsessed/fascinated and all, you will be struggling and failing to prove me wrong, for the rest of your life. It is your life to waste, and it is truly entertaining sometimes (when you truly deserve it), and truly sad all the rest of the time; to see you wasting your life in your futile attempts to fill the black hole of your ego.
 
Last edited:
Matthew Ellard said:
I check tazanastazio's quotes as he is a serial liar. He applies completely different meanings to what the quotes represent. :)
Click to expand...

How does that make me a liar? Read the quote and understand it the way it makes sense to you. I didn't cut the quote, like you often do, choosing only what is beneficial to you in making your point. I told you , you calling me a liar is like a mule calling a rooster "bighead."
 
tazanastazio said:
You have built a glassy fantasy world
Click to expand...
I didn't write your crap "infinities of infinities religious manifesto. You did! :D

tazanastazio said:
First after he got his behind whooped repeatedly, he Googled me, found a picture of mine, and posted it in the other skeptic site blog.
Click to expand...
You are lying again. You use your own photo in your posts. Are you now claiming I can change your account? :p
https://www.skepticforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=28434&sid=9396687a785abeda9202f3f475476257


tazanastazio said:
In school we would be taught of the Bible in every single grade
Click to expand...
It that where you discovered 1/3 of angels disguised themselves with radioactivity, as you claimed?
:p

tazanastazio said:
The way I see it, you being obsessed/fascinated and all.
Click to expand...
In reality, you keep coming back here, so we can all laugh at you. We don't go to you, do we? :p
 
Matthew Ellard said:
You lied in your very last post. Who loaded up your photo as your avatar? Me or you?

Why do you lie so much? :D
Click to expand...

Dude, didn't you post my picture, in one of your responses in my thread, first, BEFORE I decided to post it as my Avatar (since you had done it already)? Careful now, there is no twisting here, this is a Yes or a No question. Answer it.

I told you not to shoot yourself in the foot, again and again! I told you your ego prevents you from being a quick learner! You have zero credibility, whatsoever!



Click here https://www.skepticforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=28434&start=200


Go to the very last post, the last two lines of the post read:

" Thanks for taking the time to find my picture in the Internet and posting it, nobody can accuse me for arrogance that way, much obliged !

Last edited by TazAnastazio on Thu Jul 05, 2018 1:06 pm, edited 3 times in total. "
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
Matthew Ellard said:
I didn't write your crap "infinities of infinities religious manifesto. You did! :D


.........................................................................

Crap is what you have written yourself all this time in responding to my topic. Time to write something of your own, instead of quoting and criticizing the writings of other people. COWARD!

.........................................................................

You are lying again. You use your own photo in your posts. Are you now claiming I can change your account? :p
https://www.skepticforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=28434&sid=9396687a785abeda9202f3f475476257

...............................................................................

Click here https://www.skepticforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=28434&start=200


Go to the very last post, the last two lines of the post read:

" Thanks for taking the time to find my picture in the Internet and posting it, nobody can accuse me for arrogance that way, much obliged !

Last edited by TazAnastazio on Thu Jul 05, 2018 1:06 pm, edited 3 times in total. "


.................................................................................

It that where you discovered 1/3 of angels disguised themselves with radioactivity, as you claimed?
:p

........................................................................

You don't understand what I say here, you pretentious weasel? "... they could of course evolve an altered image by means of misusing technology (radioactivity), if God had allow for their species to exist for that long of a time interval..."

The previous clause is in parenthesis and refers to the previous clause to that! This simply says, that if we or other species were to live long enough to go through a thermonuclear war, or otherwise misuse radiation WE/THEY MAY HAVE OUR/THEIR APPEARANCE ALTERED through teratogeny and other effects of radiation.

You are either cognitively or linguistically challenged, or you are just a liar.

...............................................................................

[/B]
In reality, you keep coming back here, so we can all laugh at you. We don't go to you, do we? :p
Click to expand...

...............................................................................

Who's "we?" I did not come here for you? I didn't even know that you honored this site with your presence. Though I was not surprised you having nothing better to do with your life than criticize people on forums. WRITE AND PUBLISH YOUR OWN STUFF YOU LYING COWARD! YOU HAVE ZERO CREDIBILITY, WHATSOEVER!
 
Last edited:
tazanastazio said:
This the only argument that you've made for which I don't already refer explicitly in my original post. Duly noted, I will. Why do you bad mouth logic and reason? Isn't scientific exprimentation based on empirical evidence? Doesn't it take logic/reason to judge the quality of the evidence?

Next.
Click to expand...

Your OP is an apparently endless screed of bare assertions. I read as much as I could stand, but my eyes started to glaze over. Please quote the specific parts of your text in which you answer my points.
I am not bad-mouthing logic and reason. I assumed you were conversant with such things as Intelligent Design, in which religious believers attempt to use specious logic to prove the existence of their particular god, because they don't have any actual physical evidence. Obviously, I was wrong to assume you had this kind of knowledge.
However, as you have neither physical, empirical, experimental evidence, nor any kind of logical backing for your claims, it is safe to assume they are not worth consideration.
Feel free to take time off from your personal grudge-match with Matthew Ellard any time you like, and respond. For your information, I don't think your conceited and arrogant personal attacks are gaining you any followers here. I'd stick to the arguments if I were you, or at least read the membership agreement. Some things may be infinite, but the patience of the mods is not.
 
Cosmic Yak said:
Your OP is an apparently endless screed of bare assertions. I read as much as I could stand, but my eyes started to glaze over. Please quote the specific parts of your text in which you answer my points.
I am not bad-mouthing logic and reason. I assumed you were conversant with such things as Intelligent Design, in which religious believers attempt to use specious logic to prove the existence of their particular god, because they don't have any actual physical evidence. Obviously, I was wrong to assume you had this kind of knowledge.
However, as you have neither physical, empirical, experimental evidence, nor any kind of logical backing for your claims, it is safe to assume they are not worth consideration.
Feel free to take time off from your personal grudge-match with Matthew Ellard any time you like, and respond. For your information, I don't think your conceited and arrogant personal attacks are gaining you any followers here. I'd stick to the arguments if I were you, or at least read the membership agreement. Some things may be infinite, but the patience of the mods is not.
Click to expand...

Duly noted, thank you. But if you scroll up you'll see that I continuously ignored him calling me a "liar", then he claimed that I "hinted" I was "Jesus." This is the only way he can win this debate and he knows it. By getting me banned. In the other forum where the mods are on his side he got away with downright insulting me continuously and the mod said his remarks were "innocuous."
 
Last edited:
tazanastazio said:
Dude, didn't you post my picture, in one of your responses in my thread, first, BEFORE I decided to post it as my Avatar
Click to expand...
No. You use a fake name remember. How would I know what you look like. You really can't remember what you did a day ago can you? :p


tazanastazio said:
Go to the very last post, the last two lines of the post read:
Click to expand...
"Last edited by TazAnastazio on Thu Jul 05, 2018 8:06 pm, edited 3 times in total."

You loaded up your photo as your avatar. I used "Tin -Eye" picture search to find your other posts on other forums. :p
 
tazanastazio said:
I haven't erased my post 2 years now. I am still here...
Click to expand...
Matthew Ellard said:
You only joined in September 2019.

Mathematics and English aren't your strong points are they?
Click to expand...
tazanastazio said:
You are hallucinating, here is the link READ THE DATE ON TOP OF THE ORIGINAL POST. "by TazAnastazio » Sun Jul 23, 2017 9:21 am"
Click to expand...
You left the Skeptic Society forum after being humiliated 2 years ago and stopped posting two years ago. That was after Pyrrho, the moderator refused to delete your account and posts again. You then turned up here at the International Skeptics Forum and spammed all the same rubbish. :p
 
tazanastazio said:
Who's "we?"
Click to expand...
That would be "Skeptics" laughing at you, as you posted your incoherent religious nonsense on the Skeptic Society Forum and then again on the International Skeptics Forum.

tazanastazio said:
I did not come here for you?
Click to expand...
I am a skeptic. That's why I am here. You seem to be struggling with this concept.

Currently there are several people, like yourself, with no science or mathematics skills, entertaining skeptics with their insane religious and bogus science claims. You are just one of an endless stream of people who come here to get laughed at.

The Theory of Relativity will begin to fall apart in 2016/2017
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=330864

I killed Duality and Uncertainty for a Theory of Everything
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=338655

Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark?
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=333037

The Infinite! In Search of The Ultimate Truth.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=338895

Questioning the existence or non-existence of spirits/Pseudo-skeptics
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=338287

The Qur'an corrects the mistakes of the false Injil/Torah
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=326115
 
Matthew Ellard said:
You left the Skeptic Society forum after being humiliated 2 years ago and stopped posting two years ago. That was after Pyrrho, the moderator refused to delete your account and posts again. You then turned up here at the International Skeptics Forum and spammed all the same rubbish. :p
Click to expand...

WE WILL SEE ABOUT THAT!

Visit last reply after following the link below:

https://www.skepticforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=28434&start=680

Now everyone on both sites will know how credible you are. Wonder what Pyrrho the moderator would think if he visits this site and finds out you drug his name through the mud of your lies!
 
Last edited:
tazanastazio said:
This is the only way he can win this debate and he knows it. By getting me banned.
Click to expand...
Firstly, I cannot get you banned. Only moderators can ban members.

Secondly, you haven't actually set out a hypothesis that can be debated, but rather you have merely posted endless incoherent sentences

Frankly, I think you are hilarious with claims that 1/3 of angels disguise themselves using radioactivity and there is no such thing as time and your "applications" of calculus, when you don't know what calculus is. Every now and then you even say your "theory" is complete, you claim victory and then change your theory again a day later. :p
 
Matthew Ellard said:
Firstly, I cannot get you banned. Only moderators can ban members.

Secondly, you haven't actually set out a hypothesis that can be debated, but rather you have merely posted endless incoherent sentences

Frankly, I think you are hilarious with claims that 1/3 of angels disguise themselves using radioactivity and there is no such thing as time and your "applications" of calculus, when you don't know what calculus is. Every now and then you even say your "theory" is complete, you claim victory and then change your theory again a day later. :p
Click to expand...

Now he's trying to fill up the thread to cover up his mistakes:

I already said the post you pulled from the archives of 2013 included a clause with a parenthesis which referred to the previous clause. Of course that would not work for you in making a point so you chose to direct attention away from it.

The following clause simply says, and I repeat, that if we or other species were to live long enough to go through a thermonuclear war, or otherwise misuse radiation WE/THEY MAY HAVE OUR/THEIR APPEARANCE ALTERED through teratogeny and other effects of radiation.

I have already exposed you for your miserable attempt to mislead everyone, and for your lack of credibility.
 
tazanastazio said:
Now he's trying to fill up the thread to cover up his mistakes:
Click to expand...
Nope. You wrote it. You then tried to hide it by asking Pyrrho the moderator to delete your account.

So tell us......how did a third of angels thrown out of heaven disguise themselves by using radioactivity.....as you claimed? :D

tazanastazio said:
"1/3 of the Angels who rebelled against God and were cast out from heaven shows), they could of course evolve an altered image by means of misusing technology (radioactivity)"
Click to expand...

https://www.skepticforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=22197#p379351
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom