So.
You're saying that either option would apply equally well?
After all, there is little if any question that he is corrupt enough to merit impeachment.
And virtually no question at all that he is too unstable to be trusted with the responsibilities of the office of the POTUS.
Either way works for me, as long as he gets gone.
Nope...though I want Trump out of the White House very,very, badly..I was just pointing out that the 25th Amendment is not applicable where criminal or corruption is involved. It is in case the President is unable to perform his duties for health reasons, physical or mental.
If a president were to have a heart attack and go into a coma, that might last for weeks, that is where the 25th would come into play. It legally does not apply if the issue is corruption and criminal behavior. That is where Impeahcment comes in.
You don't mess with perfection.
[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/thum_716695d8d4f1c0b006.jpg[/qimg]
Melania could hide his condition and govern in his stead a la Edith Wilson.
OK...I had a hard time typing that while laughing hysterically. As if Melania could do anything other than design the WH Christmas decorations.
You don't mess with perfection.
[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/thum_716695d8d4f1c0b006.jpg[/qimg]
She can probably do darn near anything more competently than Don.
Melania could hide his condition and govern in his stead a la Edith Wilson.
OK...I had a hard time typing that while laughing hysterically. As if Melania could do anything other than design the WH Christmas decorations.
Every movie is better with CGI surely. All them pretty and exciting pitchers and no real need for boring chatter.
Get with the times.
(I confess I haven't watched Dam Busters yet. It's on my list.)
I predict that Trump will start blasting every Republican who doesn't straight out support him publicly.
I predict that Trump will start blasting every Republican who doesn't straight out support him publicly.
Vanity Fair said:In public, Donald Trump’s allies are putting on a brave face, repeating talking points, mostly staying on message. But in private, there are few who believe that the allegations leveled by an intelligence agency whistle-blower that Trump abused American foreign policy to leverage Ukraine into investigating Joe Biden won’t result in considerable damage—if not the complete unraveling of his presidency. “I don’t see how they don’t impeach,” a former West Wing official told me today. “This could unwind very fast, and I mean in days,” a prominent Republican said.
Trump’s final bulwark is liable to be his first one: Fox News. Fox controls the flow of information—what facts are, whether allegations are to be believed—to huge swaths of his base. And Republican senators, who will ultimately decide whether the president remains in office, are in turn exquisitely sensitive to the opinions of Trump’s base. But even before the whistle-blower’s revelations, Fox was having something of a Trump identity crisis, and that bulwark has been wavering. In recent weeks, Trump has bashed Fox News on Twitter, taking particular issue lately with its polling, which, like other reputable polls, has shown the president under significant water. Meanwhile, Trump’s biggest booster seems to be having doubts of his own. This morning, Sean Hannity told friends the whistle-blower’s allegations are “really bad,” a person briefed on Hannity’s conversations told me. (Hannity did not respond to a request for comment). And according to four sources, Fox Corp CEO Lachlan Murdoch is already thinking about how to position the network for a post-Trump future. A person close to Lachlan told me that Fox News has been the highest rated cable network for seventeen years, and “the success has never depended on any one administration.” (A Fox Corp spokesperson declined to comment.)
When will Trump's execution of the whistleblower take place? Will there be tickets like for the rallies?
I predict that Trump will start blasting every Republican who doesn't straight out support him publicly.
No damages so long as he remains anonymous, I reckon.
In another era a couple of senior Republicans would call upon Trump in his study, have a polite but frank chat about the obligations of a gentleman, and then leave him alone with a revolver.
However that would be unthinkable now; of all the things Trump's been accused of in his long and dreadful life, being a gentleman isn't one of them.
I predict he'll try to throw Giuliani under the bus and Giuliani will sing like a bird, possibly by mistaking damning evidence against them both as exonerating evidence for him personally. I judge Giuliani's grasp of reality to be about on level with Trump's loyalty to his underlings. It's not a recipe for success.
A Civiqs survey of 1,548 registered U.S. voters, held Sept. 21-24, asked respondents if they support the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact. More than half—52%—said they would support a “one person, one vote” initiative such as the NPVIC. Breaking down the numbers, the division is strictly along party lines: 89% of Democratic voters supported a popular vote initiative, while 78% of Republicans opposed the idea.
Wait until Donny finds out that even Hannity thinks this is "really bad".
“It’s Management Bedlam”: Madness at Fox News as Trump Faces Impeachment
Looking forward to Trump declaring that Fox is fake news too.
It's his ego. He started his reelection campaign the day after his inauguration. Now part of that was almost certainly Trump manipulating campaign donations. He has a long history of manipulating funds in his own charity.BTW I keep on reading oen reason why Trump wants so badly to be reelected is he is going to face huge legal problems once he leaves the office of President. So it might not just be his huge ego at work.
So far, Trump has not shown the intelligence to know when to get out.I think that when he finally feels the **** hitting the fan, he's going to resign -- it's the only way in his mind to save face. "You didn't fire me! I quit!"