A matter of translation. In some translations it's the same day, which is obviously a lie unless God has very long days, in others God simply states that he will die, which is as true as if I'd state that you all will die (sooner or later).
That would be very interesting! Unfortunately for us, the story of Rapunzel is not considered to be true by too many people, and certainly no one posting here. Also, I believe the interpretations would be more limited and it isn't really as interesting philosophically. But why not?
Well, on the one hand you have the tree of life, and on the other, you have the tree of knowledge. Whereas a tree draws its sustenance from the ether above (sunlight), and the decadence and decay (microbes) from the soil below. Neither should we forget that this whole episode (of man) transpired in God's little orchard, commonly referred to as the Garden of Eden. So, in effect, man represents the fallen fruit of the tree. Indeed, what is the very first commandment that God issues to Adam and Eve? ... "Be fruitful and multiply." ~ Genesis 1:28
Yes, and the whole thing no doubt stems from the Universal seed which, God had planted. Meaning, the criteria for the known Universe or, blueprint, had already been determined beforehand.
Did you read my reply to Merc above?
That is perfectly true. In order to make mistakes or commit sins you first have to exist.
Won't do evil? Then, yes He is omnipotent.
Does God take God out of context? No. Yet it is possible to take God out of context. How so? Indeed, how could we learn of God otherwise?
I will once again request that you try to keep something at least resembling lucidity when replying to me as I hate trying to translate your "I do not know what I am saying so I will try and sound cryptic" into English.
So god created us knowing full well that we would err and make mistakes, yet instead of "forgive and forget" (for which we believe is divine) he punishes by drowning and immolation. So your saying he created with the plan of drowning and burning us. Seems abit heartless does it not?
So god could not help them to defeat the iron chariots? Or was that his plan?
Welcome to Iaachus. Argument by obfuscation.
Oh, so you did "seem" to understand? Yes, how is it possible to know of "some-thing," unless it were contrasted with "no-thing." How is it possible to learn of God (without being God ourselves that is), except by means of His absence? ...
Wonderful! Now you finally understand the argument against your notion that god is everywhere. You have, in your world-view, no "no god" condition to compare to...