I suggest taking a break from all this feverish research into a person who is not worth listening to and who irritates you as much as you say. It can’t be healthy.
You are the one for exaggeration aren't you?
I suggest taking a break from all this feverish research into a person who is not worth listening to and who irritates you as much as you say. It can’t be healthy.
Errrr...she campaigns on climate change, so it really is.
I think she is pretty brave given how much she puts up with all the slime being thrown her way by a lot of guys losing their **** when they see her. In fact the people attacking her give every impression of being the ones who are deeply disturbed.
Oh so you have now "researched" her,.I said I watched her for the first time.
Darat
Let me introduce you to thing called the media and the internet.
They have these things call articles with written quotes and headlines.
Would you like me to post and example?
Oh so you have now "researched" her,.
Right so you don't know what scientists you have listened to, you don't know what she says, but you know you don't like her and disagree with what she saysNope
Is angrysoba's exaggeration thing catching?
Right so you don't know what scientists you have listened to, you don't know what she says, but you know you don't like her and disagree with what she says
One would almost think that you haven't a clue!
Right so you don't know what scientists you have listened to, you don't know what she says, but you know you don't like her and disagree with what she says
One would almost think that you haven't a clue!
I suspect what you mean is that after a quick Google search 10 minutes ago you read that.One of the more odder things I saw in the last few days reading about her is I came across a discussion on her Wiki Talk page arguing over why it can't have her full name. It isn't on there.
[emoji16]I suggest taking a break from all this feverish research into a person who is not worth listening to and who irritates you as much as you say. It can’t be healthy.
Don't be silly, we are all 100% rational and we all behave in exactly the same way, so there is no need for her to be repeating herself. She could have just said it once and that would have done the trick.Nagging can be a powerful motivator ...
Could you provide the name of that scientist and how you decided he or she was the appropriate scientist to listen to?I do know what scientist I listen to.
I can read news sites
I never said I didn't like her. I have never meet her.
I said I disagree with one aspect of what she says
Don't be silly, we are all 100% rational and we all behave in exactly the same way, so there is no need for her to be repeating herself. She could have just said it once and that would have done the trick.
Could you provide the name of that scientist and how you decided he or she was the appropriate scientist to listen to?
Will you?Yes I could
Will you?
Michael Knowles had just finished discussing why he believes meatless diets may be worse for the environment during a Fox News segment about climate change on Monday night when he suddenly pivoted to one of the day’s biggest stories.
“None of that matters because the climate hysteria movement is not about science,” said the conservative pundit and Daily Wire podcast host. “If it were about science, it would be led by scientists rather than by politicians and a mentally ill Swedish child who is being exploited by her parents and by the international left.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...-greta-thunberg-mentally-ill-michael-knowles/
Another great example of typical Fox News maturity. ******* degenerates.