Greta Thunberg - brave campaigner or deeply disturbed?

[cullennz]

Good. That's exactly what Greta's main message was. Just like Oystein said.

Her main message seems to be to be irritating to listen to and over act.



Sent from my SM-J111M using Tapatalk

 

[cullennz]

Congratulations! This happens to be Greta Thunberg's core message to politicians: "Please listen to the scientists!"

I didn't need an irritating 16 year old with zero life experience or education to tell me what is the bleedn obvious.

Sent from my SM-J111M using Tapatalk

 

[Skeptic Ginger]

Them why is she wasting useful scientist speaking time? How about as she is about to walk up there, she calls up a scientist?

Oh for pity's sake!

Tell me, which scientist was that waiting to speak?

 

[lionking]

I didn't need an irritating 16 year old with zero life experience or education to tell me what is the bleedn obvious.

Sent from my SM-J111M using Tapatalk

I’m sure she will be devastated that you are not listening to her. She will have to console herself with the millions that are.

 

[Skeptic Ginger]

Some people in this forum fit right in. Even Fox apologized.

Fox News guest’s shocking comment that Greta Thunberg is ‘mentally ill’ brings speedy network apology

Wow, they'll attack a teenager delivering a message rather than admit global warming is an urgent problem.

 

[Skeptic Ginger]

I’m sure she will be devastated that you are not listening to her. She will have to console herself with the millions that are.

 

[8enotto]

I bothered to listen to some of her speeches, it's all over the news again.

The bottomless shaming without offering a solution comes up short. Listen to the scientists could be choose one that says what we want to hear.

I doubt she writes her own speeches, I doubt she researched the claims she makes.
As a voice of some group of environmentalists she fits the bill perfectly, but I can't help to look for the ones behind her, and their motives.

Yes, we should not be wrecking earth but it isn't going to be destroyed in a short period of time. Stop with the shock tactics and offer solutions acceptable to that group, I might even agree they are good. And stop the attempts at shaming, its lame.

 

[cullennz]

I’m sure she will be devastated that you are not listening to her. She will have to console herself with the millions that are.

Why would she be?

I doubt she knows who I am.

 

[angrysoba]

I think I'll stick to listening to scientists.

Indeed. Which scientists should we be listening to on this issue?

 

[cullennz]

I bothered to listen to some of her speeches, it's all over the news again.

The bottomless shaming without offering a solution comes up short. Listen to the scientists could be choose one that says what we want to hear.

I doubt she writes her own speeches, I doubt she researched the claims she makes.
As a voice of some group of environmentalists she fits the bill perfectly, but I can't help to look for the ones behind her, and their motives.

Yes, we should not be wrecking earth but it isn't going to be destroyed in a short period of time. Stop with the shock tactics and offer solutions acceptable to that group, I might even agree they are good. And stop the attempts at shaming, its lame.

^^^^

This

 

[angrysoba]

And stop the attempts at shaming, its lame.

Such as the claims of child exploitation, exploitation of the mentally handicapped/mentally ill, use of Nazi hair etc...?

 

[Skeptic Ginger]

I bothered to listen to some of her speeches, it's all over the news again.

The bottomless shaming without offering a solution comes up short. Listen to the scientists could be choose one that says what we want to hear.

I doubt she writes her own speeches, I doubt she researched the claims she makes.
As a voice of some group of environmentalists she fits the bill perfectly, but I can't help to look for the ones behind her, and their motives.

Yes, we should not be wrecking earth but it isn't going to be destroyed in a short period of time. Stop with the shock tactics and offer solutions acceptable to that group, I might even agree they are good. And stop the attempts at shaming, its lame.

It's not like we don't know what the solutions are.

 

[lionking]

^^^^

This

This? What!!

The person being shamed is Greta. Do you agree that global warming is not so bad and will take a while to happen?

Where is the evidence others wrote her speeches? And that she has done no research?

This? ********

 

[cullennz]

Indeed. Which scientists should we be listening to on this issue?

A broad range of scientists when the topic is something as broad as climate change is the usual.

Climatologists, geologists yadda yadda yadda

 

[cullennz]

This? What!!

The person being shamed is Greta. Do you agree that global warming is not so bad and will take a while to happen?

Where is the evidence others wrote her speeches? And that she has done no research?

This? Bullshiit.

I don't think it is as imminent as her hysterical, over-acted claims.

"I doubt she writes her own speeches"

"I doubt she researched the claims she makes."

 

[angrysoba]

A broad range of scientists when the topic is something as broad as climate change is the usual.

Climatologists, geologists yadda yadda yadda

You argue the same thing as here, but you think she’s wrong because you don’t like her voice?

That’s rather snowflakey, no?

 

[lionking]

I don't think it is as imminent as her hysterical, over-acted claims.

"I doubt she writes her own speeches"

"I doubt she researched the claims she makes."

There’s your problem. What you think is irrelevant.

 

[cullennz]

This? What!!

The person being shamed is Greta. Do you agree that global warming is not so bad and will take a while to happen?

Where is the evidence others wrote her speeches? And that she has done no research?

This? ********

And, no offence but you need to up your game.

If you want to meet Greta's standards this post has to be at least twice as infuriated. I wasn't even convinced you were about to burst into tears typing it.

 

[The Great Zaganza]

She's just a kid, you can't blame her. Blame the people who called her to come speak instead of a scientist. They shouldn't put her in the spotlight like this, it's child exploitation.

that is a very patronizing thing to say.
She is 16. And from all that we know, she is very much her own person.

 

[cullennz]

You argue the same thing as here, but you think she’s wrong because you don’t like her voice?

That’s rather snowflakey, no?

Apart from the ******** the world is going to end any moment message she goes on about, where did I say she was wrong?