Merged Advanced Aviation Threat Identification Program UFO'S

[skyeagle409]

The thread has been bumped to promote a repeated History channel TV show on UFOs called "Unidentified:Inside America’s UFO Investigation "

In essence Tom Delonge, from the band Blink 182, started a company, in 2017, to take money from UFO believers called "To the Stars Academy". It was this company that released the fake HUD of a navy pilot chasing a UFO.
https://dpo.tothestarsacademy.com/

"To the Stars Academy" had an entertainment division and produced a 6 part show called "Unidentified: Inside America’s UFO Investigation" starring.....Tom Delonge. The show's early episodes recently flopped.

"Unidentified: Inside America’s UFO Investigation" / IMDB
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt10016814/

That's all that is going on.......weak internet promotion.

Just to let you know, that HUD imagery was not faked by any means and such encounters have occurred between civilian and military aircraft for decades around the world. Case in point, details of an encounter between an Air Force F-86 and a flying saucer which was published by the USAF in its science book at the Air Force Academy.
-----------------------------------------------------------

INTRODUCTORY SPACE SCIENCE - VOLUME II
CHAPTER XXXIII
UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECTS
DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS - USAF
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE ACADEMY

We too have fired on UFO's. About ten o'clock one morning, a radar site near a fighter base picked up a UFO doing 700 mph. The UFO then slowed to 100 mph, and two F-86's were scrambled to intercept. Eventually one F-86 closed on the UFO at about 3,000 feet altitude. The UFO began to accelerate away but the pilot still managed to get within 500 yards of the target for a short period of time. It was definitely saucer-shaped.

As the pilot pushed the F-86 at top speed, the UFO began to pull away. When the range reached 1,000 yards, the pilot armed his guns and fired in an attempt to down the saucer. He failed, and the UFO pulled away rapidly, vanishing in the distance.

http://www.cufon.org/cufon/afu.htm


American Air Force, Navy and even Army helicopter pilots have encountered flying saucers for many years.

Even foreign pilots encountered the objects. Case in point regarding the Belgian Air Force.

UFO Statement by Emile J. Schweicher, Professor Emeritus at the Belgian Royal Military Academy

Professor Schweicher was interviewed in the German UFO documentary film, “UFOs 2000” (RTL) regarding the Brussels radar UFO incident that involved Belgian Air Force F-16 jet fighters and several radar stations on 30-31 (p.m. into a.m.) March 1990:

"... radar expert Professor Emile J. Schweicher says the following: “The UFO could make right angle turns at constant speeds. That is impossible according to our mechanical laws of motion. I don’t think it’s possible to explain away UFO incidents that involve multiple radar stations by saying that all the radars had the same malfunction at the same time. That’s highly unlikely! There exist different types of radar systems, different sorts of antennas. And the radar antennas orientation towards the UFO were all different. I’m going to get fired – but I’m of the opinion that it’s highly likely that extraterrestrial intelligence is behind the UFO phenomenon!”

Emile J. Schweicher,

Professor Emeritus (Ret.)

Royal Military Academy, Belgium

 

[Cosmic Yak]

I might add that the Air Force acknowledged in its 1948 EOTS report, ATIC, Wright-Patterson AFB, the objects are “Interplanetary Spaceships.” But, I knew that all along

How old are you, skyeagle409?

71

I think you missed my point.

You are saying that when the Air Force released its report in 1948, it confirmed what you had known all along, when you either hadn't been born yet, or were a few-months-old baby.
I know you may claim that it was a mere slip, but you are attempting to argue about precise and detailed information: inaccuracies like this undermine your claims even further.

I say 'even further', because you are simply rehashing all the stuff you posted before, which we have gone over and debunked in some detail several times already.

 

[skyeagle409]

I think you missed my point.

You are saying that when the Air Force released its report in 1948, it confirmed what you had known all along, when you either hadn't been born yet, or were a few-months-old baby.

What the Air Force report concluded in 1948 and its intelligence concluded in 1952 is what I knew all along, and that is, the UFOs in question are not of this earth. You simply misunderstood the point I was making.

I say 'even further', because you are simply rehashing all the stuff you posted before, which we have gone over and debunked in some detail several times already.

You are incorrect when you said in regard to the case files I brought up before, they have been debunked. Make an inquiry under the Freedom of Information Act to understand I am correct. To let you know, there are very good reasons why I post selected UFO case files.

 

[Delphic Oracle]

Some documents exist which purport a thing to be true =/= the thing purported is true

Drawing circles around on screen displays does not make your assertion about what the display is attempting to show more valid or accurate.

Quoting old newspapers written by laypersons who conflate standard procedures for unauthorized aircraft with proof of a specific plan to address flying saucers, not gonna cut it.

Quoting old newspapers written by persons who had recently authored a book on the subject, not gonna cut it.

 

[skyeagle409]

Some documents exist which purport a thing to be true =/= the thing purported is true

Drawing circles around on screen displays does not make your assertion about what the display is attempting to show more valid or accurate.

Quoting old newspapers written by laypersons who conflate standard procedures for unauthorized aircraft with proof of a specific plan to address flying saucers, not gonna cut it.

Quoting old newspapers written by persons who had recently authored a book on the subject, not gonna cut it.

It is all part of the overall picture that ET visitation is a reality. I have used newspaper articles of the 1940's regarding Project Mogul to prove my point that Project Mogul balloons were not classified and Project Mogul records to prove that there was no such thing as Project Mogul balloon flight #4 in regard to the Roswell incident, which brings up the question as to how the Air Force managed to dupe many people on a Project Mogul balloon flight #4 that never was after duping the public for 47 years that a weather balloon was responsible. And that brings up yet another question as to how the Air Force managed to dupe the public that 6-foot test dummies and accident victims of the 1950's were the 4-foot alien bodies people saw in 1947?!

There are very good reasons why the Air Force ordered its pilots to shoot down flying saucers and why the Air Force issued reports concluding the UFOs in question are "interplanetary spaceships."

There are very good reasons why my former base, Hill AFB, UT, (1968 -1971) became involved in investigations where flying saucers dismantled our Minuteman missiles in the field. We were the maintenance depot for those missiles and maintenance depot for the F-4 Phantom, two of which were involved in the 1976 UFO encounter over Iran.

The US government is currently releasing pieces of its puzzle of declassified UFO case files and it is just a matter of placing the pieces of the puzzle in their proper places to understand what the picture of the puzzle depicts.

 

[Delphic Oracle]

"There are very good reasons why..." does not mean the reason is spaceships.

 

[Jack by the hedge]

Regarding the claim that a DSP satellite detected something during the Tehran UFO incident; did I blink or has this non-secret secret evidence not been posted yet?

 

[Matthew Ellard]

Once again, no rabbit holes responsible for the object that landed in the forest.

The photos are of three rabbit holes. There are thousands of rabbit holes in Rendlesham forest. You can't get away from that.

You also keep running away from the radiation. You claim the landing site was radioactive........yet it isn't.

Do you think magical decontamination bunnies cleared up the radiation?

I am also very familiar with radiation.

No you are not. You don't have a clue. Why aren't the three rabbit holes radioactive?

You have been caught lying three times since you started posting again.

 

[Matthew Ellard]

That picture was not taken from the East Gate! Now, examine the following photos and understand that it was impossible for the guards at the East Gate to see the lighthouse.

Ian Ridpath took photos. Didn't you know?

Ian Ridpath photograph and movies of lighthouse
"Flashes: Vince Thurkettle interviewed by me in Rendlesham Forest for BBC TV in October 1983. The lighthouse beam is seen over his shoulder, above left of the blue on-screen clock. Click on the picture to go to a separate page from which you can download a movie file showing the lighthouse flashing."

"Additional information came from other eyewitnesses – the local police, called to the scene by the Woodbridge air base. The police officers who visited the site reported that they could see no UFO, only the Orford Ness lighthouse. Like Vince Thurkettle, they attributed the landing marks to animals.
http://www.ianridpath.com/ufo/rendlesham1a.htm

 

[Matthew Ellard]

Just to let you know, that HUD imagery was not faked by any means

It was faked by "To the Stars Academy"'s TV production suite.

The US department of defence never released any video. The USA department of defence issued a press release clarifying that they did not release any video.

You are posting here because "to the stars academy" has run out of money and is trying to raise $30,000,000 dollars by selling shares.

"To the Stars Academy / July 2019 / Share offer document
https://static1.squarespace.com/sta...903/TTSA_Reg+A+#2_Offering+Circular_FINAL.pdf

 

[skyeagle409]

"There are very good reasons why..." does not mean the reason is spaceships.

It does when additional data is brought into play and radar data is considered evidence for ET-related vehicles. For an example, the following data proves beyond a shadow of a doubt the object the following data relates to was not of this Earth because the following data depicts an object demonstrating advanced maneuvering and propulsion technology unknown to mankind and I've pointed out locations on the following data that proves my point.

F-16 Radar Data

The Data

00 200 150 7000

01 200 150 7000

02 200 150 7000

03 200 150 7000

04 200 150 6000 <---

05 270 560 6000 <---

06 270 560 6000

07 270 570 6000

08 270 560 7000

09 270 550 7000

10 210 560 9000

11 210 570 10000

12 210 560 11000

13 210 570 10000 <---

14 270 770 7000 <---

15 270 770 6000

16 270 780 6000

17 270 790 5000 <---

18 290 1010 4000 <---

19 290 1000 3000

20 290 990 2000

21 290 990 1000 <---

22 300 990 0000 <---

22.5 300 980 0000 Break lock <---

 

[skyeagle409]

It was faked by "To the Stars Academy"'s TV production suite.

The US department of defence never released any video. The USA department of defence issued a press release clarifying that they did not release any video.

You are posting here because "to the stars academy" has run out of money and is trying to raise $30,000,000 dollars by selling shares.

"To the Stars Academy / July 2019 / Share offer document
https://static1.squarespace.com/sta...903/TTSA_Reg+A+#2_Offering+Circular_FINAL.pdf

Wrong! That was a Department of Defense video.

The sightings were reported to the Pentagon’s Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program, which analyzed the radar data, video footage and accounts provided by senior officers from the Roosevelt.

In late 2014, a Super Hornet pilot had a near collision with one of the objects, and an official mishap report was filed. Some of the incidents were videotaped, including one taken by a plane’s camera in early 2015 that shows an object zooming over the ocean waves as pilots question what they are watching.

The following image is a military release of a B-52 radar photo that depicts an encounter with a UFO.

Upon reaching the object the B-52 flew alongside and executed a left turn over and around it. As the B-52 banked over the object, copilot Capt. Bradford Runyon was able to observe the UFO through the pilot’s window as it passed beneath the aircraft. He described a huge egg-shaped object with a surface that appeared to give off a dull reddish color like molten steel. As they began the turn, he noticed a smooth metallic tubular section extending horizontally from the long-end of the elliptical object, connecting to the mid-point of a curved crescent-shaped protuberance, not unlike a bumper.

The US Government has been releasing declassified its UFO case files over the years that are now setting us on a road to full disclosure and I expect full disclosure in our lifetimes, but don't expect disclosure to be made at the White House, the United Nations will have that honor. To sum it up, it is just a matter of time.

Chile announces UFOs are for real:

On 2nd April 1997, Chilean newspaper "La Cuarta" has the following headline: "UFO Sighting of Arica is Confirmed by La Direccion General de Aeronautic Civil." Chile did start to join the small number of countries who officially stated that the nature of UFOs is of intelligent driven flying machines.

Brazilian Air Force Opens Its UFO Files to Public

They were talking about UFO files and UFO reality and their research of UFOs, how they are not able to fully understand because of the technology involved is far beyond their comprehension. They were speaking openly for about 15 minutes on national television.

UFOs are real - Former Canadian Defense Minister

(PRWEB) - OTTAWA, CANADA (PRWEB) November 24, 2005 -- A former Canadian Minister of Defence and Deputy Prime Minister under Pierre Trudeau has joined forces with three Non-governmental organizations to ask the Parliament of Canada to hold public hearings on Exopolitics -- relations with ETs.

By ETs, Mr. Hellyer and these organizations mean ethical, advanced extraterrestrial civilizations that may now be visiting Earth.

On September 25, 2005, in a startling speech at the University of Toronto that caught the attention of mainstream newspapers and magazines, Paul Hellyer, Canadas Defence Minister from 1963-67 under Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Prime Minister Lester Pearson, publicly stated: "UFOs, are as real as the airplanes that fly over your head."


Military Nuclear Specialists Testify To UFO Reality

Several military and intelligence witnesses who were Strategic Air Command ...SAC) and other nuclear specialists have come forward with testimony proving that UFOs are real and appear to be concerned about our nuclear weapons.

 

[skyeagle409]

Ian Ridpath took photos. Didn't you know?

Ian Ridpath photograph and movies of lighthouse
"Flashes: Vince Thurkettle interviewed by me in Rendlesham Forest for BBC TV in October 1983. The lighthouse beam is seen over his shoulder, above left of the blue on-screen clock. Click on the picture to go to a separate page from which you can download a movie file showing the lighthouse flashing."

"Additional information came from other eyewitnesses – the local police, called to the scene by the Woodbridge air base. The police officers who visited the site reported that they could see no UFO, only the Orford Ness lighthouse. Like Vince Thurkettle, they attributed the landing marks to animals.
http://www.ianridpath.com/ufo/rendlesham1a.htm

It is very simple. Here is photo evidence proving beyond a shadow of a doubt why it was impossible for the lighthouse, which is equipped with a light-blocking shield facing the East Gate from miles away, could not be seen from the East Gate.

 

[Matthew Ellard]

It is very simple. Here is photo evidence proving beyond a shadow of a doubt why it was impossible for the lighthouse, which is equipped with a light-blocking shield facing the East Gate from miles away, could not be seen from the East Gate.

You are lying again with forged photos after the road was moved. You are claiming that the lighthouse is blocked from shining inland. Are you saying Ian Ridpath and the BBC crew were filming from the middle of the ocean?

The BBC filmed from the exact locations at the same time five days after the event and filmed the lighthouse. You can watch the video yourself.

"It shows the Orford Ness lighthouse flashing as seen from Rendlesham Forest, in the same direction that the US airmen saw their flashing UFO. You can download a movie file of the interview by clicking on the picture above, or see the entire report by clicking here. Copyright remains with the BBC."
http://www.ianridpath.com/ufo/rendlesham1c.htm

Here is the 2 minute BBC documentary of the lighthouse as seen by the security guards.
http://www.ianridpath.com/ufo/rendleshamreport_ridpath.mov

How do you explain the BBC video that was broadcast?

 

[Matthew Ellard]

Wrong! That was a Department of Defense video

No. We have been through this before. The DoD issued a press release saying it was not their video.

Tell us exactly the person (1) who handed the video to the NYT in a hotel room and what company he works for now (2) (Hint : 1) Luis Elizondo 2) "To the stars academy")

"Whatever the truth about otherworldly UFOs (cue a collective eye-roll from scientists), there is one crucial detail missing from “Unidentified,” as well as from all the many stories that have quoted Elizondo since he outed himself nearly two years ago to a wide-eyed news media: There is no discernible evidence that he ever worked for a government UFO program, much less led one.

Pentagon spokesperson Christopher Sherwood told me. However, he added: “Mr. Elizondo had no responsibilities with regard to the AATIP program while he worked in OUSDI [the Office of Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence], up until the time he resigned effective 10/4/2017.”

That directly contradicts an email sent by a spokesperson for To The Stars Academy of Arts & Science, a UFO research and entertainment company that Elizondo joined after he left the Defense Department.
https://theintercept.com/2019/06/01/ufo-unidentified-history-channel-luis-elizondo-pentagon/

Why do you lie so much, knowing that Elizondo was debunked as a liar and never worked on UFOs for the Dod?

 

[skyeagle409]

You are lying again with forged photos after the road was moved.

People who have visited the East Gate site have said that it was impossible to see anything from the lighthouse at the East Gate and remember, the lighthouse was equipped with a light-blocking shield facing the East Gate from many miles away.

The last photo I posted makes the fact very clear that it was impossible to see the lighthouse from the East Gate, even without that light-blocking shield on the lighthouse facing the East Gate, which means that video was not taken from the East Gate site since that light-blocking shield on the lighthouse and the thick forest would have prevented any light flashes from reaching the eyes of the guards at the East Gate. The lighthouse was built years before the event, and yet, there were no UFO reports in or above the Rendlesham forest on the level of the event from the East Gate in the years before 1980 and the event occurred again, which involved the deputy base commander.

 

[skyeagle409]

No. We have been through this before. The DoD issued a press release saying it was not their video.

Let's take a look here.

Head of Pentagon’s secret ‘UFO’ office sought to make evidence public

DeLonge’s To the Stars shot onto everyone’s radar last year after the company released a declassified 2015 video that reportedly showed U.S. Navy pilots encountering a UFO.

The clip, called “GO FAST,” is "an authentic DoD video that captures the high-speed flight of an unidentified aircraft at low altitudes,” a TTSA press release said. The Navy confirmed a fleet-wide message on the UFO-reporting initiative is in the works.

While this development comes sans any admission of the existence of alien life, it signals a return to DoD acknowledgement that the series of recently documented encounters are at least authentic enough to warrant further investigation.


A Raytheon ATFLIR Targeting Pod

After the return of the first team to Nimitz, a second team took off at approximately 12:00 PST, this time equipped with an advanced infrared camera (FLIR pod). This camera recorded an evasive unidentified aerial system on video, publicly released by the Pentagon on 16 December 2017 alongside the revelation of the funding of the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...bcb7cc-e2b2-11e7-8679-a9728984779c_story.html

Lt. Graves and his fellow pilots told the newspaper that "the video showed objects accelerating to hypersonic speed, making sudden stops and instantaneous turns — something beyond the physical limits of a human crew."

A newly released video from the Department of Defense appears to show U.S. Navy pilots encountering a UFO. ABC News reported Monday that the pilots confronted the mysterious object in 2015 while flying along the East Coast.

The Pentagon has given The New York Times the following video video which shows a F/A-18F from USS Nimitz aircraft carrier – flown by a former CO of VFA-41 Black Aces – encountering an unidentified flying object (UFO) in November 2004.

UFO Video

https://youtu.be/XdE5Psqh57I


https://www.navytimes.com/off-duty/...loping-guidelines-on-reporting-ufo-sightings/
https://www.thedailybeast.com/video-shows-navy-pilots-encounter-with-possible-ufo

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/navy-p...rk-times-military-unidentified-flying-object/

https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/did-us-navy-fighter-jet-get-video-footage-ufo-68662

 

[Matthew Ellard]

People who have visited the East Gate site have said that it was impossible to see anything from the lighthouse at the East Gate and remember, the lighthouse was equipped with a light-blocking shield facing the East Gate from many miles away..

Stop lying. The BBC filmed the lighthouse at night at the exactly the same time. I linked you to it. You are pretending to forget again as you are a liar.

Have you watched the BBC documentary where they film the lighthouse at 3AM at exactly the locations the security guards say the light? YES or NO?

Here is the 3 minute BBC video. It takes 30 seconds to download and play. It clearly shows that you are lying again.
http://www.ianridpath.com/ufo/rendle...rt_ridpath.mov

(You also are pretending to forget that the police went on the second night to the same landing spot and wrote in their report they could only see the light from the lighthouse. )

 

[Matthew Ellard]

DeLonge’s To the Stars shot onto everyone’s radar last year after the company released a declassified 2015 video that reportedly showed U.S. Navy pilots encountering a UFO.

You are lying again. The Department of Defence issued a press release stating it was not their video and that Luis Elizondo, who claimed he obtained the video as head of the AATIP, never worked for the AATIP


Pentagon spokesperson Christopher Sherwood told me. However, he added: “Mr. Elizondo had no responsibilities with regard to the AATIP program while he worked in OUSDI [the Office of Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence], up until the time he resigned effective 10/4/2017.”

Tom Delonge and Luis Elizondo are two con artists currently trying to raise $30,000,000 from UFO idiots, using "To the Stars Academy" which really makes money selling T-shirts for Tom Delonge's new rock band.
https://tothestars.media/collections/all-products/apparel

 

[skyeagle409]

Stop lying. The BBC filmed the lighthouse at night at the exactly the same time.

Once again, the lighthouse cannot be seen from the East Gate, especially since a light-blocking shield that faces toward the East Gate was installed blocking any light from the lighthouse to the East Gate.

The photo you originally posted was not taken from the location of the East Gate, it was taken at the eastern edge of the forest that faces the lighthouse.

Orford Ness lighthouse seen from the eastern edge of Rendlesham Forest in daylight.

In other words, the photo you posted was nowhere near the East Gate. Another photo taken at night through the forest was nowhere near the East Gate either.

Now, let's take a look here.

Caption for the above photo reads in part:

"The view from East Gate. Looking east from East Gate along the access road towards the forest...Note that the Orford Ness lighthouse cannot be seen directly from East Gate;"